Sawamura Y, de Tribolet N
Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Adv Tech Stand Neurosurg. 1990;17:3-64. doi: 10.1007/978-3-7091-6925-4_1.
In summary, many actual interactions between tumors in the CNS and the immune system have been demonstrated. The normal brain does not possess a lymphatic system and is partially hidden from the systemic immune system by the BBB, furthermore brain cells do not express MHC antigens which are necessary for the initiation of an immune response. In pathological conditions however, immunocompetent cells may find their way through transformed endothelial cells. Microglia and astrocytes may function as antigen presenting cells. Glioma cells when stimulated by cytokines such as IFN gamma can be induced to express MHC class I and class II antigens, thus making them more susceptible to an immune attack. In addition glioma cells are capable of secreting several cytokines including IL 1, IL 3 and IL 6 also involved in the generation of an immune response. Indeed, a functional analysis of lymphocytes infiltrating gliomas has revealed the accumulation at the tumor site of cytotoxic T lymphocytes as well as NK cells. However host-immune responses against gliomas seem to be weak in comparison to other cancers. Glioma cells are known to secrete TGF beta 2 and PGE 2 which may in part be responsible for this lack of immune response, thus shielding themselves from immune attack. In order to be recognized by the immune system the tumor cells must express TAA in addition to MHC antigens, and such TAA have been identified by MAbs. These MAbs can be used for "targeted" therapy when coupled to toxic agents or radionuclides. Preclinical studies have shown that, after intravenous or intracarotid injection, there is specific accumulation of the MAb in the tumor but in insufficient amounts for therapeutic use. The relatively small amount of MAb binding to the tumor in vivo can be due to several factors: not all the cells in a single tumor express a given tumor-associated antigens, the MAb may have a low affinity for the antigen, the BBB may hinder the passage of the MAb. Attempts have been made to overcome these drawbacks by opening the BBB for example. In addition MAbs can readily be used for the treatment of carcinomatous meningitis. There has been little success in the development of immunotherapy with IFN beta 1 and even less with adoptive immunotherapy using LAK cells plus IL 2. TIL as well as LAK cells can be expanded in vitro with IL2 and it is feasible to reinject these cells into the tumor site.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
综上所述,中枢神经系统肿瘤与免疫系统之间的许多实际相互作用已得到证实。正常大脑不具备淋巴系统,且血脑屏障使其部分免受全身免疫系统的影响,此外,脑细胞不表达启动免疫反应所必需的MHC抗原。然而,在病理状态下,免疫活性细胞可能会通过转化的内皮细胞进入大脑。小胶质细胞和星形胶质细胞可作为抗原呈递细胞发挥作用。当胶质瘤细胞受到如干扰素γ等细胞因子刺激时,可被诱导表达MHC I类和II类抗原,从而使其更容易受到免疫攻击。此外,胶质瘤细胞能够分泌多种细胞因子,包括白细胞介素1、白细胞介素3和白细胞介素6,这些细胞因子也参与免疫反应的产生。事实上,对浸润胶质瘤的淋巴细胞进行功能分析发现,细胞毒性T淋巴细胞以及自然杀伤细胞在肿瘤部位聚集。然而,与其他癌症相比,宿主对胶质瘤的免疫反应似乎较弱。已知胶质瘤细胞会分泌转化生长因子β2和前列腺素E2,这可能部分导致了这种免疫反应的缺乏,从而使它们免受免疫攻击。为了被免疫系统识别,肿瘤细胞除了表达MHC抗原外,还必须表达肿瘤相关抗原(TAA),并且已经通过单克隆抗体鉴定出了此类TAA。当与毒性剂或放射性核素偶联时,这些单克隆抗体可用于“靶向”治疗。临床前研究表明静脉内或颈内动脉注射后,单克隆抗体在肿瘤中有特异性聚集,但数量不足以用于治疗。体内与肿瘤结合的单克隆抗体数量相对较少可能有几个因素:单个肿瘤中的并非所有细胞都表达给定的肿瘤相关抗原,单克隆抗体可能对抗原亲和力较低,血脑屏障可能会阻碍单克隆抗体的通过。例如,人们已尝试通过打开血脑屏障来克服这些缺点。此外,单克隆抗体可很容易地用于治疗癌性脑膜炎。使用干扰素β1进行免疫治疗几乎没有成功,使用LAK细胞加白细胞介素2进行过继性免疫治疗则更不成功。肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞(TIL)以及LAK细胞可用白细胞介素2在体外扩增,将这些细胞重新注入肿瘤部位是可行的。(摘要截选至400字)