UMR CNRS 5558, Université Lyon 1, Lyon, France.
Am J Ther. 2012 Jul;19(4):269-80. doi: 10.1097/MJT.0b013e3182246a49.
The benefit of heart rate (HR) reduction in patients with stable coronary artery disease is well demonstrated for symptom prevention and relief, and benefits on outcomes are being actively investigated. We aimed to quantify the reduction in resting HR induced by 5 antianginal drugs frequently used for symptom prevention (diltiazem, verapamil, atenolol, metoprolol, and ivabradine) in stable angina pectoris. We identified studies published between 1966 and 2007 in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane database and reviewed the bibliographies to locate additional studies. Eligible studies were double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials in patients with stable angina. Trials were combined using weighted mean difference and fixed-effect model meta-analysis. The main outcome measure was resting HR at the study end. For diltiazem, resting HR reduction versus placebo ranged from -0.08 beats per minute (bpm) [95% confidence interval (CI) -1.5 to +1.4] for 120 mg/d to -8.0 bpm (95% CI, -11.1 to -5.0) with 360 mg/d. For sustained-release diltiazem, there was a reduction in resting HR of -4.5 bpm (95% CI, -6.4 to -2.5), with no dose-response relationship (heterogeneity P = 0.62). Resting HR reductions for the other agents were -3.2 bpm (95% CI, -5.1 to -1.3) for verapamil (with no dose-response relationship, heterogeneity P = 0.87); -19.0 bpm (95% CI, -20.4 to -17.6) for atenolol; -13.2 bpm (95% CI, -14.7 to -11.7) for metoprolol (with greater reductions for 150 mg/d and long-acting 190 mg/d); and between -9.3 bpm (95% CI, -13.8 to -4.8) and -19.6 bpm (95% CI, -23.8 to -15.4) for ivabradine. Ivabradine, atenolol, and metoprolol give similar reductions in resting HR (-10 to -20 bpm), whereas verapamil and diltiazem produce only marginal reductions (<10 bpm).
在稳定型冠状动脉疾病患者中,心率(HR)降低可有效预防和缓解症状,而其对结局的益处也正在积极研究中。我们旨在量化在稳定型心绞痛患者中,5 种常用于预防症状的抗心绞痛药物(地尔硫卓、维拉帕米、阿替洛尔、美托洛尔和伊伐布雷定)引起的静息心率降低。我们检索了 1966 年至 2007 年间在 PubMed、Embase 和 Cochrane 数据库中发表的研究,并对参考文献进行了回顾,以确定其他研究。纳入的研究为稳定型心绞痛患者的双盲、随机、安慰剂对照试验。采用加权均数差和固定效应模型进行荟萃分析。主要结局指标为研究结束时的静息心率。地尔硫卓 120mg/d 时,与安慰剂相比,静息心率降低 0.08 次/分(95%置信区间-1.5 至+1.4),360mg/d 时降低 8.0 次/分(95%置信区间-11.1 至-5.0)。对于地尔硫卓控释制剂,静息心率降低 4.5 次/分(95%置信区间-6.4 至-2.5),无剂量-反应关系(异质性 P=0.62)。维拉帕米、阿替洛尔、美托洛尔的静息心率降低分别为-3.2 次/分(95%置信区间-5.1 至-1.3)(无剂量-反应关系,异质性 P=0.87)、-19.0 次/分(95%置信区间-20.4 至-17.6)、-13.2 次/分(95%置信区间-14.7 至-11.7)(150mg/d 和长效 190mg/d 降低更多);伊伐布雷定的静息心率降低分别为-9.3 次/分(95%置信区间-13.8 至-4.8)和-19.6 次/分(95%置信区间-23.8 至-15.4)。伊伐布雷定、阿替洛尔和美托洛尔使静息心率降低相似(-10 至-20 次/分),而维拉帕米和地尔硫卓仅产生较小幅度降低(<10 次/分)。