Section of GeriatricsDivision of General Internal Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2011 Sep;59(9):1739-43; quiz 1743-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03538.x. Epub 2011 Aug 1.
It has previously been shown that medical students perform poorly when assessing older adults with recurrent falls. To address this and teach students about other geriatric syndromes, a standardized patient, played by one of nine actresses, aging during the course of an afternoon, was developed. The patient is first aged 75 with falls, then 80 with memory problems, then 82 with an acute confusional state. The third-year students interact with the patient on a one-to-one basis. After seeing and examining her, the students write up the case and then meet with the supervising physician after each section to discuss the case. This intervention was well accepted, scoring 5.95 on a 7-point Likert-type scale. At the end of the clinical year, the students participated in an eight-case clinical skills examination that included a 79-year-old man with falls. Using the actor's checklists, the performances of the 42 medical students who had participated in the standardized patient experience were compared with those of the 128 who had not. Over the eight cases, there was no difference in the three domains of communication, information gathering, and physical examination, but in the geriatric case, the students who had participated in the experience performed significantly better in all three domains. The intervention students were also three times as likely to examine the subject's gait (60% vs 20%). A 3-hour interactive session substantially improved specific geriatric competencies. One can only wonder what more dedicated time could accomplish.
先前的研究表明,医学生在评估反复跌倒的老年患者时表现不佳。为了解决这个问题并向学生教授其他老年综合征,我们开发了一个标准化患者,由九位女演员中的一位扮演,她在一个下午的时间里逐渐变老。患者首先是 75 岁、有跌倒史,然后是 80 岁、有记忆问题,接着是 82 岁、有急性意识混乱状态。三年级的学生与患者进行一对一的互动。在观察和检查完患者后,学生写出病例,然后在每个部分后与主治医生会面讨论病例。这种干预措施得到了很好的接受,在 7 分制的李克特量表上得分为 5.95。在临床学年结束时,学生参加了一个包括一位 79 岁跌倒男性的八项临床技能考试。使用演员的检查表,比较了参加标准化患者体验的 42 名医学生和未参加的 128 名医学生的表现。在这八个病例中,在沟通、信息收集和体格检查三个领域没有差异,但在老年病例中,参加过体验的学生在所有三个领域的表现都明显更好。参加过体验的学生也更有可能检查患者的步态(60%比 20%)。一个 3 小时的互动式课程大大提高了特定的老年综合能力。人们不禁要问,更多的专门时间能带来什么不同。