Ibáñez Borja, Fuster Valentín, Macaya Carlos, Jiménez-Borreguero Jesús, Iñiguez Andrés, Fernández-Ortiz Antonio, Sanz Ginés, Sánchez-Brunete Vicente
Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares Carlos III (CNIC), Madrid, España.
Rev Esp Cardiol. 2011 Jul;64 Suppl 2:28-33. doi: 10.1016/j.recesp.2011.02.028.
Acute myocardial infarction is caused by sudden coronary artery occlusion. Persistent ischemia results in necrosis of the myocardial tissue supplied by the occluded vessel. It has recently been shown that the final size of the infarct is a major predictor of future clinical events, and is, therefore, used as a surrogate outcome in clinical trials. Moreover, it has become clear that the duration of ischemia in the main determinant of the success of myocardial salvage (i.e. of non-necrotic at-risk myocardium). In addition to minimizing the time between symptom onset and reperfusion, there is considerable interest in finding therapies that can further limit the size of the infarction (i.e. cardioprotective therapies) and they are the focus of numerous clinical studies. Oral β-blockade within the first few hours of an AMI is a class-IA indication in clinical practice guidelines. However, early intravenous β-blockade, even before coronary artery reperfusion, is not routinely recommended. Preclinical research has demonstrated that the selectiveβ1-blocker metoprolol is able to reduce the infarct size only when administered before coronary artery reperfusion, which indicates that its cardioprotective properties are secondary to its ability to reduce reperfusion injury. In addition, retrospective studies of AMI suggest that starting intravenous β-blockade early has clinical benefits (i.e. lower mortality and better recovery of left ventricular contractility) in patients without contraindications. Our general hypothesis is that early administration of metoprolol (i.e. intravenously before reperfusion) results in smaller infarcts than administering the drug orally after reperfusion. The Effect of METOprolol in CARDioproteCtioN during an acute myocardial InfarCtion (METOCARD-CNIC) trial will test this hypothesis in patients with ST-segment elevation AMI.
急性心肌梗死是由冠状动脉突然闭塞引起的。持续性缺血导致被闭塞血管所供应的心肌组织坏死。最近的研究表明,梗死灶的最终大小是未来临床事件的主要预测指标,因此在临床试验中被用作替代结局。此外,已经明确缺血持续时间是心肌挽救(即非坏死性危险心肌)成功与否的主要决定因素。除了尽量缩短症状发作与再灌注之间的时间外,人们对寻找能够进一步限制梗死面积的治疗方法(即心脏保护疗法)也非常感兴趣,这些疗法是众多临床研究的重点。在急性心肌梗死最初几小时内口服β受体阻滞剂是临床实践指南中的IA类适应证。然而,即使在冠状动脉再灌注之前,早期静脉注射β受体阻滞剂也未被常规推荐。临床前研究表明,选择性β1受体阻滞剂美托洛尔只有在冠状动脉再灌注之前给药才能缩小梗死面积,这表明其心脏保护特性继发于其减轻再灌注损伤的能力。此外,对急性心肌梗死的回顾性研究表明,在没有禁忌证的患者中,早期开始静脉注射β受体阻滞剂具有临床益处(即降低死亡率和更好地恢复左心室收缩力)。我们的总体假设是,早期给予美托洛尔(即在再灌注前静脉注射)比在再灌注后口服该药物导致的梗死灶更小。急性心肌梗死期间美托洛尔心脏保护作用(METOCARD-CNIC)试验将在ST段抬高型急性心肌梗死患者中检验这一假设。