Suppr超能文献

在异质性立体定向体部放射治疗治疗计划中进行剂量监测单位检查。

Monitor unit checking in heterogeneous stereotactic body radiotherapy treatment planning.

作者信息

Higgins Patrick D, Adolfson Troy, Cho L Chinsoo, Saxena Rishik

机构信息

Department of Therapeutic Radiology-Radiation Oncology, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN 55455-0110, USA.

出版信息

Med Dosim. 2011 Autumn;36(3):255-63. doi: 10.1016/j.meddos.2010.04.003. Epub 2010 Jun 17.

Abstract

Treatment of lung cancer using very-high-dose fractionation in small fields requires well-tested dose modeling, a method for density-averaging compound targets constructed from different parts of the breathing cycle, and monitor unit verification of the heterogeneity-corrected treatment plans. The quality and safety of each procedure are dependent on these factors. We have evaluated the dosimetry of our first 26 stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) patients, including 260 treatment fields, planned with the Pinnacle treatment planning system. All targets were combined from full expiration and inspiration computed tomography scans and planned on the normal respiration scan with 6-MV photons. Combined GTVs (cGTVs) have been density-averaged in different ways for comparison of the effect on total monitor units. In addition, we have compared planned monitor units against hand calculations using 2 classic 1D correction methods: (1) effective attenuation and (2) ratio of Tissue-Maximum Ratios (TMRs) to determine the range of efficacy of simple verification methods over difficult-to-perform measurements. Different methods of density averaging for combined targets have been found to have minimal impact on total dose as evidenced by the range of total monitor units generated for each method. Nondensity-corrected treatment plans for the same fields were found to require about 8% more monitor units on average. Hand calculations, using the effective attenuation method were found to agree with Pinnacle calculations for nonproblematic fields to within ±10% for >95% of the fields tested. The ratio of TMRs method was found to be unacceptable. Reasonable choices for density-averaging of cGTVs using full inspiration/expiration scans should not strongly affect the planning dose. Verification of planned monitor units, as a check for problematic fields, can be done for 6-MV fields with simple 1D effective attenuation-corrected hand calculations.

摘要

在小射野中使用超高剂量分割治疗肺癌需要经过充分验证的剂量建模、一种用于对呼吸周期不同阶段构建的密度平均复合靶区的方法,以及对经不均匀性校正的治疗计划进行监测单位验证。每个步骤的质量和安全性都取决于这些因素。我们评估了使用Pinnacle治疗计划系统为最初26例立体定向体部放疗(SBRT)患者制定的剂量学,包括260个治疗射野。所有靶区均由全呼气和吸气计算机断层扫描合并而成,并在正常呼吸扫描上使用6兆伏光子进行计划。联合大体肿瘤体积(cGTVs)已采用不同方式进行密度平均,以比较对总监测单位的影响。此外,我们将计划的监测单位与使用两种经典一维校正方法的手工计算结果进行了比较:(1)有效衰减和(2)组织最大剂量比(TMRs)之比,以确定简单验证方法在难以进行测量时的有效性范围。已发现,不同的联合靶区密度平均方法对总剂量的影响极小,这从每种方法产生的总监测单位范围可以看出。对于相同射野,未进行密度校正的治疗计划平均需要多约8%的监测单位。使用有效衰减方法的手工计算结果与Pinnacle计算结果在>95%的测试射野中对于无问题射野的偏差在±10%以内。发现TMRs之比方法不可接受。使用全吸气/呼气扫描对cGTVs进行密度平均的合理选择不应强烈影响计划剂量。作为对有问题射野的检查,对于6兆伏射野,可以通过简单的一维有效衰减校正手工计算来验证计划的监测单位。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验