• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在萎缩的上颌后牙区植入短种植体时,种植体直径和骨质对生物力学的影响分析。

Biomechanical analysis of the effects of implant diameter and bone quality in short implants placed in the atrophic posterior maxilla.

机构信息

Department of Periodontics, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, 5, Fusing St., Gueishan Township, Taoyuan County 333, Taiwan.

出版信息

Med Eng Phys. 2012 Mar;34(2):153-60. doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2011.07.005. Epub 2011 Jul 31.

DOI:10.1016/j.medengphy.2011.07.005
PMID:21807548
Abstract

Short dental implant (SDI) placement has been proposed as an alternative to reduce the surgical risks related to the advanced grafting procedures. The aim of this study was to simulate the biomechanical behaviors and influences of SDI diameters under various conditions of bone quality by using a validated finite element (FE) model for simulation. The CT image and CAD system were combined to construct the FE models with 6 mm length SDIs for 6, 7 and 8 mm diameters under three types of bone qualities, from normal to osteoporotic. The simulated results showed that implant diameter did not influence the von Mises strains of bone under the vertical load. The bone strains increased about 58.58% in the bone of least density under lateral load. Lateral loads induced high bone strain and implant stress than vertical loads. The bone strains of 7 mm- and 8 mm-diameter short implants were not different, and both were about 52% and 66% compared to those of 6 mm-wide short implant under lateral loads. The von Mises stress of the SDIs and their compartments were all less than the yield stress of the material under vertical and lateral loads. SDIs with diameter of 7 mm or above may have better mechanical transmission in the same length at feasible condition. Attaining a proper occlusal scheme design or selective occlusal adjustments to reduce the lateral occlusal force upon the SDIs is recommended.

摘要

短种植体(SDI)的植入被提议作为一种替代方法,以降低与先进的移植手术相关的手术风险。本研究旨在通过使用经过验证的有限元(FE)模型进行模拟,研究在不同骨质量条件下,SDI 直径对生物力学行为和影响。通过将 CT 图像和 CAD 系统相结合,构建了长度为 6mm、直径为 6、7 和 8mm 的 6mm 长 SDI 的 FE 模型,分为正常、骨质疏松三种骨质量类型。模拟结果表明,在垂直载荷下,种植体直径并不影响骨的 von Mises 应变。在侧向载荷下,最小密度骨中的骨应变增加了约 58.58%。侧向载荷比垂直载荷产生更高的骨应变和种植体应力。7mm 和 8mm 直径的短种植体的骨应变没有差异,与侧向载荷下 6mm 宽的短种植体相比,两者的骨应变分别约为 52%和 66%。在垂直和侧向载荷下,SDI 及其腔室的 von Mises 应力均小于材料的屈服应力。在可行的条件下,直径为 7mm 或更大的 SDI 在相同长度下可能具有更好的机械传递性能。建议设计适当的咬合方案或选择性的咬合调整,以减少 SDI 上的侧向咬合力。

相似文献

1
Biomechanical analysis of the effects of implant diameter and bone quality in short implants placed in the atrophic posterior maxilla.在萎缩的上颌后牙区植入短种植体时,种植体直径和骨质对生物力学的影响分析。
Med Eng Phys. 2012 Mar;34(2):153-60. doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2011.07.005. Epub 2011 Jul 31.
2
Biomechanical comparison of a single short and wide implant with monocortical or bicortical engagement in the atrophic posterior maxilla and a long implant in the augmented sinus.在萎缩的上颌后区,比较单根短而宽种植体与单皮质或双皮质固位、以及在增高的窦内植入长种植体的生物力学。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012 Nov-Dec;27(6):e102-11.
3
Bone loading pattern around implants in average and atrophic edentulous maxillae: a finite-element analysis.平均和萎缩性无牙上颌骨种植体周围的骨加载模式:有限元分析
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2001 Apr;29(2):100-5. doi: 10.1054/jcms.2001.0198.
4
Mechanical behavior of dental implants in different positions in the rehabilitation of the anterior maxilla.上颌前部修复中不同位置牙种植体的力学行为
J Prosthet Dent. 2014 Apr;111(4):301-9. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.06.019. Epub 2013 Dec 17.
5
Biomechanical evaluation of implant-supported prosthesis with various tilting implant angles and bone types in atrophic maxilla: A finite element study.不同倾斜种植体角度和骨类型的种植体支持式修复体在萎缩上颌骨中的生物力学评估:有限元研究。
Comput Biol Med. 2017 Jul 1;86:47-54. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2017.04.015. Epub 2017 May 4.
6
Biomechanical evaluation of tooth- and implant-supported fixed dental prostheses with various nonrigid connector positions: a finite element analysis.不同非刚性连接位置的牙支持和种植体支持固定义齿的生物力学评估:有限元分析。
J Prosthodont. 2011 Jan;20(1):16-28. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2010.00654.x.
7
Three-dimensional modeling and finite element analysis in treatment planning for orthodontic tooth movement.三维建模和有限元分析在正畸牙齿移动治疗计划中的应用。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Jan;139(1):e59-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.09.020.
8
Three-dimensional finite-element analysis of functional stresses in different bone locations produced by implants placed in the maxillary posterior region of the sinus floor.对上颌窦底后部植入种植体后不同骨部位产生的功能应力进行三维有限元分析。
J Prosthet Dent. 2005 Jan;93(1):38-44. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.10.001.
9
The effect of platform switching on stress distribution in implants and periimplant bone studied by nonlinear finite element analysis.通过非线性有限元分析研究平台转换对种植体及种植体周围骨应力分布的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2014 Nov;112(5):1111-8. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.04.017. Epub 2014 May 29.
10
Multi-factorial analysis of variables influencing the bone loss of an implant placed in the maxilla: prediction using FEA and SED bone remodeling algorithm.多因素分析影响上颌种植体骨丢失的变量:使用有限元分析和 SED 骨重塑算法进行预测。
J Biomech. 2010 Mar 3;43(4):644-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.10.030. Epub 2009 Nov 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Fatigue Behavior of Multi/Unit-Supported Dental Restorations: Implant Platform vs. Prosthetic Platform.多单位支持的牙修复体的疲劳行为:种植体平台与修复体平台对比
Dent J (Basel). 2025 Aug 18;13(8):374. doi: 10.3390/dj13080374.
2
Comparison of Epoxy Resin and Rigid Polyurethane Foam as a Bone Substitute to Study Implant Biomechanics.作为骨替代物的环氧树脂与硬质聚氨酯泡沫在研究植入物生物力学方面的比较。
Cureus. 2025 Feb 16;17(2):e79124. doi: 10.7759/cureus.79124. eCollection 2025 Feb.
3
Finite element analysis of a new alveolar bone splitting technique in the mandibular posterior region.
下颌后牙区一种新型牙槽骨劈开技术的有限元分析
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Mar 8;25(1):359. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-05559-5.
4
Comparative evaluation of pattern and distribution of stresses in single- and double-implant overdenture using ball-ring, positioner, and magnet-keeper attachment under different loading conditions: A finite element analysis.在不同加载条件下,使用球环、定位器和磁体保持器附件对单种植体覆盖义齿和双种植体覆盖义齿的应力模式和分布进行比较评估:有限元分析。
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2025 Jan 1;25(1):86-94. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_179_24. Epub 2025 Jan 3.
5
Biomechanical evaluation of six zygomatic implants versus four zygomatic implants combined with dental implants in the treatment of different maxillary defects.六枚颧骨种植体与四枚颧骨种植体联合牙种植体治疗不同上颌骨缺损的生物力学评价。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Oct 16;24(1):1230. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-05031-w.
6
Multiaxial fatigue life assessment of dental implants.牙科植入物的多轴疲劳寿命评估
Heliyon. 2024 Aug 29;10(19):e36777. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36777. eCollection 2024 Oct 15.
7
Influence of Abutment Screw-Tightening Methods on the Screw Joint: Immediate and Long-Term Stability.基台螺丝拧紧方法对螺丝连接的影响:即时和长期稳定性
Int J Dent. 2024 Jan 16;2024:5768318. doi: 10.1155/2024/5768318. eCollection 2024.
8
Effect of short implant crown-to-implant ratio on stress distribution in anisotropic bone with different osseointegration rates.短种植体冠-植体比对不同骨整合率各向异性骨中应力分布的影响。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Sep 20;23(1):683. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03379-z.
9
Success of dental implants in patients with large bone defect and analysis of risk factors for implant failure: a non-randomized retrospective cohort study.大骨缺损患者种植体的成功及种植体失败的风险因素分析:一项非随机回顾性队列研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Mar;26(3):2743-2750. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-04249-0. Epub 2021 Nov 16.
10
Internal oblique line implants in severe mandibular atrophies.严重下颌骨萎缩中的内斜线植入物
J Clin Exp Dent. 2020 Dec 1;12(12):e1164-e1170. doi: 10.4317/jced.57675. eCollection 2020 Dec.