Department of General Surgery, University College London Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012 Mar-Apr;8(2):230-5. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2011.03.016. Epub 2011 May 13.
The aim of the present study was to provide a pooled analysis of individual small trials comparing 21-mm and 25-mm circular stapled laparoscopic gastrojejunal (GJ) anastomosis in morbid obesity surgery.
A systematic literature search of MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane library databases was performed to identify all relevant studies comparing 21-mm and 25-mm circular stapled laparoscopic GJ anastomosis in morbid obesity surgery. The primary outcomes were GJ stenosis and the interval to GJ stenosis. The secondary outcomes were the estimated weight loss, GJ diameter, and the number of endoscopic dilations. Pooled odds ratios were calculated for categorical outcomes and weighted mean differences for continuous outcomes.
Five trials were included, comprising 1217 patients (393 with 21-mm and 824 with 25-mm circular GJ anastomoses). The primary outcome analysis revealed a significantly increased incidence of intraluminal stenosis associated with the 21-mm circular stapler (pooled odds ratio 3.54; P < .0001). The secondary outcome analysis revealed a significantly reduced GJ anastomotic diameter on endoscopy with the 21-mm circular stapler group (weighted mean difference -1.67; P = .002). Statistical analysis revealed no significant difference between the groups for the interval to stenosis, number of endoscopic dilations, and estimated weight loss.
The results of the present pooled analysis have demonstrated a significantly increased incidence of symptomatic stenosis associated with the 21-mm circular stapler compared with the 25-mm stapler. This serves as evidence to validate the preferential selection of the 25-mm circular stapler for laparoscopic GJ bypass.
本研究的目的是对比较 21mm 和 25mm 圆形吻合器腹腔镜胃空肠(GJ)吻合术治疗肥胖症的小型试验进行汇总分析。
系统检索 MEDLINE、Embase 和 Cochrane 图书馆数据库,以确定所有比较肥胖症手术中 21mm 和 25mm 圆形吻合器腹腔镜 GJ 吻合术的相关研究。主要结局是 GJ 狭窄和 GJ 狭窄的间隔。次要结局是估计的体重减轻、GJ 直径和内镜扩张的次数。对分类结局计算合并优势比,对连续结局计算加权均数差。
纳入 5 项试验,共 1217 例患者(21mm 组 393 例,25mm 组 824 例)。主要结局分析显示,21mm 圆形吻合器与管腔内狭窄的发生率显著增加(合并优势比 3.54;P <.0001)。次要结局分析显示,21mm 圆形吻合器组内镜下 GJ 吻合口直径显著减小(加权均数差-1.67;P =.002)。统计学分析显示,两组在狭窄间隔、内镜扩张次数和估计体重减轻方面无显著差异。
本汇总分析结果表明,与 25mm 吻合器相比,21mm 圆形吻合器与症状性狭窄的发生率显著增加。这为验证优先选择 25mm 圆形吻合器进行腹腔镜 GJ 旁路提供了证据。