Allen W, Wells C I, Greenslade M, Bissett I P, O'Grady G
Surgical Engineering Laboratory, Auckland Bioengineering Institute, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland Mail Centre, Auckland, 1142, New Zealand.
World J Surg. 2018 Oct;42(10):3097-3105. doi: 10.1007/s00268-018-4606-x.
Stricture is a common complication of gastrointestinal (GI) anastomoses, associated with impaired quality of life, risk of malnutrition, and further interventions. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the association between circular stapler diameter and anastomotic stricture rates throughout the GI tract.
A systematic literature search of EMBASE, MEDLINE and Cochrane Library was performed. The primary outcome was the rate of radiologically or endoscopically confirmed anastomotic stricture. Pooled odds ratios (OR) were calculated using random-effects models to determine the effect of circular stapler diameter on stricture rates in different regions of the GI tract.
Twenty-one studies were identified: seven oesophageal, twelve gastric, and three lower GI. Smaller stapler sizes were strongly associated with higher anastomotic stricture rates throughout the GI tract. The oesophageal anastomosis studies showed; 21 versus 25 mm circular stapler: OR 4.39 ([95% CI 2.12, 9.07]; P < 0.0001); 25 versus 28/29 mm circular stapler: OR 1.71 ([95% CI 1.15, 2.53]; P < 0.008). Gastric studies showed; 21 versus 25 mm circular stapler: OR 3.12 ([95% CI 2.23, 4.36]; P < 0.00001); 25 versus 28/29 mm circular stapler: OR 7.67 ([95% CI 1.86, 31.57]; P < 0.005). Few lower GI studies were identified, though a similar trend was found: 25 versus 28/29 mm circular stapler: pooled OR 2.61 ([95% CI 0.82, 8.29]; P = 0.100).
The use of larger circular stapler sizes is strongly associated with reduced risk of anastomotic stricture in the upper GI tract, though data from lower GI joins are limited.
狭窄是胃肠道(GI)吻合术的常见并发症,与生活质量受损、营养不良风险及进一步干预相关。本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在确定圆形吻合器直径与全胃肠道吻合口狭窄发生率之间的关联。
对EMBASE、MEDLINE和Cochrane图书馆进行系统文献检索。主要结局是经放射学或内镜证实的吻合口狭窄发生率。采用随机效应模型计算合并比值比(OR),以确定圆形吻合器直径对胃肠道不同部位狭窄发生率的影响。
共纳入21项研究:7项食管研究、12项胃研究和3项下消化道研究。较小尺寸的吻合器与全胃肠道较高的吻合口狭窄发生率密切相关。食管吻合术研究显示;21mm与25mm圆形吻合器:OR 4.39([95%CI 2.12,9.07];P<0.0001);25mm与28/29mm圆形吻合器:OR 1.71([95%CI 1.15,2.53];P<0.008)。胃研究显示;21mm与25mm圆形吻合器:OR 3.12([95%CI 2.23,4.36];P<0.00001);25mm与28/29mm圆形吻合器:OR 7.67([95%CI 1.86,31.57];P<0.005)。虽然下消化道研究较少,但发现了类似趋势:25mm与28/29mm圆形吻合器:合并OR 2.61([95%CI 0.82,8.29];P = 0.100)。
使用较大尺寸的圆形吻合器与上消化道吻合口狭窄风险降低密切相关,不过下消化道吻合的数据有限。