A comparative study of intravenous ciprofloxacin and benzylpenicillin versus netilmicin and piperacillin for the empirical treatment of fever in neutropenic patients.

We examined the efficacy of ciprofloxacin as an empirical treatment for fever in 97 neutropenic patients in a randomized study of ciprofloxacin and benzylpenicillin versus netilmicin and piperacillin. Benzylpenicillin was included because of evidence of in-vitro resistance to ciprofloxacin in some streptococci. Clinical response rate was similar in the two groups (46% resolution for ciprofloxacin/benzylpenicillin and 52% for netilmicin/piperacillin). Microbiological assessment revealed more pathogens eradicated by ciprofloxacin and benzylpenicillin (66%) and fewer persisting (3%) than in patients receiving netilmicin and piperacillin (52% and 13% respectively). Staphylococcus epidermidis was the commonest pathogen, accounting for 38% of all isolates and 30% of all treatment failures. There were no treatment failures or superinfections due to streptococci. More therapy-related adverse reactions were seen in patients on netilmicin and piperacillin (28%) compared with those on ciprofloxacin and benzylpenicillin (10%). The combination of ciprofloxacin and benzylpenicillin is as effective as a standard regimen of netilmicin and piperacillin, with fewer adverse effects, and is highly attractive as empirical therapy for the febrile, neutropenic host. The inclusion of benzylpenicillin prevents streptococcal-associated treatment failure.