Chan C C, Oppenheim B A, Anderson H, Swindell R, Scarffe J H
Department of Medical Oncology, Christie Hospital, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1989 Jan;33(1):87-91. doi: 10.1128/AAC.33.1.87.
To assess the efficacy of ciprofloxacin in neutropenic patients, we conducted a randomized prospective trial comparing the combination of ciprofloxacin and netilmicin against piperacillin plus netilmicin as an empiric treatment of fever in cancer patients with neutropenia. Of 214 evaluable episodes, 115 and 99 were randomly assigned to the ciprofloxacin and the piperacillin arms, respectively. The overall response rates were very similar (59 and 62% for the ciprofloxacin and piperacillin arms, respectively). The response for the gram-positive bacteremias was almost identical (around 40%); this low response was due in part to an outbreak of infection by a multiply resistant strain of Staphylococcus epidermidis (for which the ciprofloxacin MIC was greater than or equal to 128 micrograms/ml) which occurred during the second half of the trial. Among gram-negative bacteremias, 9 of 11 infections (82%) responded to the ciprofloxacin combination compared with 3 of 7 (43%) that responded to the piperacillin combination (P = 0.23). The incidences of persistent, profound neutropenia were comparable in both treatments, but the susceptibility of the gram-negative organism to ciprofloxacin and netilmicin was significantly higher than was susceptibility to the other combination. Ciprofloxacin was well tolerated, and patients were able to convert from intravenous to oral therapy in 64 of 115 episodes.
为评估环丙沙星对中性粒细胞减少患者的疗效,我们进行了一项随机前瞻性试验,比较环丙沙星与奈替米星联合用药和哌拉西林加奈替米星作为中性粒细胞减少癌症患者发热经验性治疗的效果。在214个可评估病例中,115例和99例分别被随机分配至环丙沙星组和哌拉西林组。总体有效率非常相似(环丙沙星组和哌拉西林组分别为59%和62%)。革兰氏阳性菌血症的有效率几乎相同(约40%);这一低有效率部分归因于在试验后半期发生的由一株多重耐药表皮葡萄球菌引起的感染暴发(环丙沙星对其MIC大于或等于128微克/毫升)。在革兰氏阴性菌血症中,环丙沙星联合用药组11例感染中有9例(82%)有效,而哌拉西林联合用药组7例中有3例(43%)有效(P = 0.23)。两种治疗中持续性严重中性粒细胞减少的发生率相当,但革兰氏阴性菌对环丙沙星和奈替米星的敏感性显著高于对另一种联合用药的敏感性。环丙沙星耐受性良好,115例中有64例患者能够从静脉治疗转为口服治疗。