Department of Health Policy and Public Health, University of the Sciences in Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
J Urban Health. 2011 Dec;88(6):1091-104. doi: 10.1007/s11524-011-9602-5.
This study examines mortality among New York City (NYC) homeless shelter users, assessing the relationships between mortality hazard and time in shelter, patterns of homelessness, and subsequent housing exits for both adults in families and single adults. Administrative records from the NYC shelter system were matched with death records from the Social Security Administration for 160,525 persons. Crude mortality rates and life tables were calculated, and survival analyses were undertaken using these data. Life expectancy was 64.2 and 68.6 years for single adult males and single adult females, respectively, and among adults in families, life expectancy was 67.2 and 70.1 years for males and females, respectively. For both groups, exits to stable housing (subsidized or non-subsidized) were associated with reduced mortality hazard. And while mortality hazard was substantially reduced for the time adults were in shelters, extended shelter use patterns were associated with increased mortality hazard. Differences between single homelessness and family homelessness extend to disparities in mortality rates. Although causal links cannot be established here, results suggest that, for both subgroups of the homeless population, prompt resolution of homelessness and availability of housing interventions may contribute to reduced mortality.
本研究考察了纽约市(NYC)无家可归者收容所使用者的死亡率,评估了死亡率风险与在收容所中的时间、无家可归模式以及家庭中的成年人和单身成年人随后的住房退出之间的关系。NYC 收容系统的行政记录与社会保障管理局的死亡记录相匹配,涉及 160525 人。计算了粗死亡率和生命表,并使用这些数据进行了生存分析。单身成年男性和女性的预期寿命分别为 64.2 岁和 68.6 岁,而家庭中的成年人的预期寿命分别为 67.2 岁和 70.1 岁。对于这两个群体,稳定住房(补贴或非补贴)的退出与降低死亡率风险相关。虽然成年人在收容所中的时间与死亡率风险显著降低有关,但延长收容所使用模式与死亡率风险增加有关。单身无家可归和家庭无家可归之间的差异延伸到死亡率的差异。尽管这里不能建立因果关系,但结果表明,对于无家可归人口的这两个亚组,无家可归问题的迅速解决和住房干预措施的提供可能有助于降低死亡率。