• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Predictors of homelessness among families in New York City: from shelter request to housing stability.纽约市家庭中无家可归的预测因素:从避难所申请到住房稳定
Am J Public Health. 1998 Nov;88(11):1651-7. doi: 10.2105/ajph.88.11.1651.
2
The impact of shelter use and housing placement on mortality hazard for unaccompanied adults and adults in family households entering New York City shelters: 1990-2002.庇护所使用和住房安置对 1990-2002 年进入纽约市庇护所的单身成年人和家庭住户成年人死亡率的影响。
J Urban Health. 2011 Dec;88(6):1091-104. doi: 10.1007/s11524-011-9602-5.
3
Mortality among homeless shelter residents in New York City.纽约市无家可归者收容所居民的死亡率。
Am J Public Health. 1999 Apr;89(4):529-34. doi: 10.2105/ajph.89.4.529.
4
Homelessness in the child welfare system: A randomized controlled trial to assess the impact of housing subsidies on foster care placements and costs.儿童福利系统中的无家可归问题:一项评估住房补贴对寄养安置和费用影响的随机对照试验。
Child Abuse Negl. 2018 Sep;83:52-61. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2018.07.014. Epub 2018 Jul 17.
5
The New York-New York housing initiative and use of public shelters by persons with severe mental illness.纽约-纽约住房倡议及重度精神疾病患者对公共庇护所的使用情况。
Psychiatr Serv. 2003 Jan;54(1):67-71. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.54.1.67.
6
Cash benefits are associated with lower risk behavior among the homeless and marginally housed in San Francisco.在旧金山,现金福利与无家可归者及居住条件差的人群中较低的风险行为相关。
J Urban Health. 2005 Mar;82(1):142-50. doi: 10.1093/jurban/jti015. Epub 2005 Feb 28.
7
Why Do Homeless Families Exit and Return the Homeless Shelter? Factors Affecting the Risk of Family Homelessness in Salt Lake County (Utah, United States) as a Case Study.为什么无家可归的家庭会离开和返回无家可归者收容所?以盐湖县(美国犹他州)为例,影响家庭无家可归风险的因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Nov 6;16(22):4328. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16224328.
8
Social relationships and vulnerability to becoming homeless among poor families.贫困家庭中的社会关系与面临无家可归的脆弱性。
Am Psychol. 1991 Nov;46(11):1180-7.
9
Family homelessness: state or trait?家庭无家可归:是状态还是特质?
Am J Community Psychol. 1997 Dec;25(6):755-69. doi: 10.1023/a:1022209028188.
10
Poverty, Homelessness, and Family Break-Up.贫困、无家可归与家庭破裂。
Child Welfare. 2015;94(1):105-122.

引用本文的文献

1
Housing Assistance and Housing Insecurity: A Study of Renters in Southeastern Michigan in the Wake of the Great Recession.住房援助与住房不安全:大衰退后密歇根州东南部租户情况研究
Soc Serv Rev. 2017 Mar;91(1):41-70. doi: 10.1086/690681.
2
Rural/urban differences in rates and predictors of intimate partner violence and abuse screening among pregnant and postpartum United States residents.城乡差异对美国孕妇和产后居民的亲密伴侣暴力和虐待筛查率和预测因素的影响。
Health Serv Res. 2024 Apr;59(2):e14212. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14212. Epub 2023 Aug 8.
3
Understanding Mechanisms Driving Family Homeless Shelter Use and Child Mental Health.了解促使家庭使用无家可归者收容所及儿童心理健康的机制。
J Soc Serv Res. 2021;47(4):473-485. doi: 10.1080/01488376.2020.1831681. Epub 2020 Oct 15.
4
Address Changes Are Associated With Unmet Glycemic Targets: Opportunities to Improve Processes and Outcomes of Care Among People With Type 2 Diabetes.地址变更与血糖控制目标未达标相关:改善 2 型糖尿病患者护理流程和结局的机会。
Perm J. 2022 Jun 29;26(2):1-10. doi: 10.7812/TPP/21.144. Epub 2022 Jun 15.
5
Temporary stays with housed family and friends among older adults experiencing homelessness: Qualitative findings from the HOPE HOME study.无家可归的老年人在有住房的家人和朋友处的临时居住情况:HOPE HOME研究的定性研究结果
Qual Soc Work. 2022 May;21(3):542-558. doi: 10.1177/14733250211012745. Epub 2021 May 6.
6
Large socio-economic, geographic and demographic disparities exist in exposure to school closures.在面临学校关闭的问题上,存在着巨大的社会经济、地理和人口差异。
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Apr;5(4):522-528. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01087-8. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
7
Why Do Homeless Families Exit and Return the Homeless Shelter? Factors Affecting the Risk of Family Homelessness in Salt Lake County (Utah, United States) as a Case Study.为什么无家可归的家庭会离开和返回无家可归者收容所?以盐湖县(美国犹他州)为例,影响家庭无家可归风险的因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Nov 6;16(22):4328. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16224328.
8
EXPLORING MULTIPLE LEVELS of ACCESS to RENTAL SUBSIDIES and SUPPORTIVE HOUSING.探索租赁补贴和支持性住房的多层次获取途径。
Hous Policy Debate. 2014;24(2):467-484. doi: 10.1080/10511482.2013.875052. Epub 2014 Mar 25.
9
"It Wasn't Just One Thing": A Qualitative Study of Newly Homeless Emergency Department Patients.“并非仅仅是某一件事”:一项针对新 homeless 急诊患者的定性研究。
Acad Emerg Med. 2019 Sep;26(9):982-993. doi: 10.1111/acem.13677. Epub 2019 Aug 16.
10
The Impact of Housing Instability on Child Maltreatment: A Causal Investigation.住房不稳定对儿童虐待的影响:一项因果关系调查。
J Fam Soc Work. 2018;21(4-5):331-347. doi: 10.1080/10522158.2018.1469563. Epub 2018 Jun 18.

本文引用的文献

1
The Relative Operating Characteristic in Psychology: A technique for isolating effects of response bias finds wide use in the study of perception and cognition.心理学中的相对工作特征:一种用于分离反应偏差效应的技术在知觉和认知研究中得到了广泛应用。
Science. 1973 Dec 7;182(4116):990-1000. doi: 10.1126/science.182.4116.990.
2
A threshold theory for simple detection experiments.简单检测实验的阈值理论。
Psychol Rev. 1963 Jan;70:61-79. doi: 10.1037/h0039723.
3
Preventing recurrent homelessness among mentally ill men: a "critical time" intervention after discharge from a shelter.预防精神病男性再次无家可归:收容所出院后的“关键时期”干预措施。
Am J Public Health. 1997 Feb;87(2):256-62. doi: 10.2105/ajph.87.2.256.
4
Adverse childhood experiences: are they risk factors for adult homelessness?童年不良经历:它们是成年人无家可归的风险因素吗?
Am J Public Health. 1997 Feb;87(2):249-55. doi: 10.2105/ajph.87.2.249.
5
Homelessness in female-headed families: childhood and adult risk and protective factors.女性为户主家庭中的无家可归问题:儿童期及成年期的风险与保护因素。
Am J Public Health. 1997 Feb;87(2):241-8. doi: 10.2105/ajph.87.2.241.
6
Housing outcomes for homeless adults with mental illness: results from the second-round McKinney program.患有精神疾病的无家可归成年人的住房状况:第二轮麦金尼计划的结果
Psychiatr Serv. 1997 Feb;48(2):239-41. doi: 10.1176/ps.48.2.239.
7
Prevalence of psychiatric disorders among incarcerated women. I. Pretrial jail detainees.被监禁女性中精神疾病的患病率。I. 审前监狱被拘留者。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1996 Jun;53(6):505-12. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1996.01830060047007.
8
Implementation of the homeless families program: 1. Service models and preliminary outcomes.无家可归家庭项目的实施:1. 服务模式及初步成果。
Am J Orthopsychiatry. 1995 Oct;65(4):502-13. doi: 10.1037/h0085057.
9
Lifetime and five-year prevalence of homelessness in the United States.美国无家可归者的终生患病率和五年患病率。
Am J Public Health. 1994 Dec;84(12):1907-12. doi: 10.2105/ajph.84.12.1907.
10
Why does family homelessness occur? A case-control study.家庭无家可归现象为何会发生?一项病例对照研究。
Am J Public Health. 1988 Jul;78(7):783-8. doi: 10.2105/ajph.78.7.783.

纽约市家庭中无家可归的预测因素:从避难所申请到住房稳定

Predictors of homelessness among families in New York City: from shelter request to housing stability.

作者信息

Shinn M, Weitzman B C, Stojanovic D, Knickman J R, Jiménez L, Duchon L, James S, Krantz D H

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Wagner Graduate School of Public Service, New York University, NY 10003, USA.

出版信息

Am J Public Health. 1998 Nov;88(11):1651-7. doi: 10.2105/ajph.88.11.1651.

DOI:10.2105/ajph.88.11.1651
PMID:9807531
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1508577/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study examined predictors of entry into shelter and subsequent housing stability for a cohort of families receiving public assistance in New York City.

METHODS

Interviews were conducted with 266 families as they requested shelter and with a comparison sample of 298 families selected at random from the welfare caseload. Respondents were reinterviewed 5 years later. Families with prior history of shelter use were excluded from the follow-up study.

RESULTS

Demographic characteristics and housing conditions were the most important risk factors for shelter entry; enduring poverty and disruptive social experiences also contributed. Five years later, four fifths of sheltered families had their own apartment. Receipt of subsidized housing was the primary predictor of housing stability among formerly homeless families (odds ratio [OR] = 20.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 9.9, 42.9).

CONCLUSIONS

Housing subsidies are critical to ending homelessness among families.

摘要

目的

本研究调查了纽约市一群接受公共援助的家庭进入收容所的预测因素以及随后的住房稳定性。

方法

对266个申请收容所的家庭以及从福利案件量中随机抽取的298个家庭组成的对照样本进行了访谈。5年后对受访者进行了再次访谈。有过使用收容所历史的家庭被排除在后续研究之外。

结果

人口特征和住房条件是进入收容所的最重要风险因素;长期贫困和破坏性的社会经历也有影响。5年后,五分之四的受庇护家庭拥有了自己的公寓。获得补贴住房是以前无家可归家庭住房稳定的主要预测因素(优势比[OR]=20.6,95%置信区间[CI]=9.9,42.9)。

结论

住房补贴对于消除家庭无家可归现象至关重要。