• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过社区护理健康博览会进行血压筛查:激励个人寻求后续医疗保健服务。

Blood pressure screenings through community nursing health fairs: motivating individuals to seek health care follow-up.

作者信息

Lucky Daniel, Turner Barbara, Hall Melissa, Lefaver Scott, de Werk Art

机构信息

College of Nursing, Health and Human Services, Indiana State University, Terre Haute, Indiana, USA.

出版信息

J Community Health Nurs. 2011 Jul;28(3):119-29. doi: 10.1080/07370016.2011.588589.

DOI:10.1080/07370016.2011.588589
PMID:21809928
Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effectiveness of blood pressure [BP] screenings through community-based health fairs. Effectiveness was measured by those with high BP readings who either made an appointment with or actually followed up with their primary care provider [PCP] in person following post-screening referral.

DATA SOURCES

Anonymized data were provided for 958 individuals who obtained BP screening through a three-day health fair provided by the Ceres Police Department Nurse Program.

CONCLUSIONS

Of 958 screened, 170 (17.8%) were identified with high BP readings and provided with PCP referral. Data were analyzed on 124 individuals with high BP recordings. Of the 124 PCP referrals, 116 (93%) either made an appointment with or followed up in person with their PCP following BP screening. Of the 98 who visited with their PCP, 29 (30%) were either placed on BP medication, had their current BP medication dose increased, or were changed to another BP medication by their PCP.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Hypertension remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality. Nurse-operated health fairs, crafted to identify those with high BP readings, are promising as a simple and effective means in motivating individuals to seek follow-up care.

摘要

目的

评估通过社区健康博览会进行血压筛查的效果。效果通过筛查后被转介的血压读数高的人来衡量,这些人要么预约了初级保健医生(PCP),要么在筛查后亲自去看了初级保健医生。

数据来源

提供了958人的匿名数据,这些人通过Ceres警察局护士项目举办的为期三天的健康博览会进行了血压筛查。

结论

在958名接受筛查的人中,有170人(17.8%)血压读数高,并被转介给初级保健医生。对124名血压读数高的人进行了数据分析。在这124次转介给初级保健医生的情况中,有116人(93%)在血压筛查后要么预约了初级保健医生,要么亲自去看了初级保健医生。在去看初级保健医生的98人中,有29人(30%)要么开始服用降压药,要么增加了当前降压药的剂量,要么被初级保健医生换成了另一种降压药。

对实践的启示

高血压仍然是发病和死亡的主要原因。由护士操作的健康博览会旨在识别血压读数高的人,有望成为激励个人寻求后续护理的一种简单有效的手段。

相似文献

1
Blood pressure screenings through community nursing health fairs: motivating individuals to seek health care follow-up.通过社区护理健康博览会进行血压筛查:激励个人寻求后续医疗保健服务。
J Community Health Nurs. 2011 Jul;28(3):119-29. doi: 10.1080/07370016.2011.588589.
2
A randomized, controlled trial of a simple emergency department intervention to improve the rate of primary care follow-up for patients with acute asthma exacerbations.一项关于急诊科简单干预措施的随机对照试验,该干预旨在提高急性哮喘加重患者的初级保健随访率。
Ann Emerg Med. 2001 Aug;38(2):115-22. doi: 10.1067/mem.2001.116593.
3
Home blood pressure monitoring. Effect on use of medical services and medical care costs.家庭血压监测。对医疗服务使用和医疗费用的影响。
Med Care. 1992 Sep;30(9):855-65.
4
A process for developing community consensus regarding the diagnosis and management of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.一个就注意力缺陷/多动障碍的诊断和管理达成社区共识的过程。
Pediatrics. 2005 Jan;115(1):e97-104. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-0953.
5
Dental screening and referral of young children by pediatric primary care providers.儿科初级保健提供者对幼儿进行牙科筛查和转诊。
Pediatrics. 2004 Nov;114(5):e642-52. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1269.
6
Osteopathic medicine and community health fairs: increasing public awareness while improving public health.整骨医学与社区健康博览会:提高公众意识的同时改善公众健康。
J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2008 Aug;108(8):397-403.
7
The veterans' study to improve the control of hypertension (V-STITCH): design and methodology.退伍军人高血压控制改善研究(V-STITCH):设计与方法
Contemp Clin Trials. 2005 Apr;26(2):155-68. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2004.12.006.
8
The impact of a multidisciplinary information technology-supported program on blood pressure control in primary care.多学科信息技术支持项目对初级保健中血压控制的影响。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2009 May;2(3):170-7. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.108.823765. Epub 2009 May 5.
9
Effectiveness of a program to improve hypertension screening in primary care.一项改善初级保健中高血压筛查的项目的有效性。
CMAJ. 1994 Feb 15;150(4):509-15.
10
Student-led rural health fairs: attempting to improve medical education and access to health care.学生主导的农村健康集市:致力于改善医学教育及医疗服务可及性。
South Med J. 2011 Aug;104(8):598-603. doi: 10.1097/SMJ.0b013e31822580a9.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors Associated With Discussing High Blood Pressure Readings in Clinical Notes.临床记录中与讨论高血压读数相关的因素。
Am J Hypertens. 2025 Mar 17;38(4):225-232. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpae153.
2
Feasibility of Remote Unsupervised Cognitive Screening With SATURN in Older Adults.利用 SATURN 对老年人进行远程非监督认知筛查的可行性。
J Appl Gerontol. 2023 Sep;42(9):1903-1910. doi: 10.1177/07334648231166894. Epub 2023 Mar 31.
3
Socioeconomic characteristics of African American women attending community blood pressure screenings.
参加社区血压筛查的非裔美国女性的社会经济特征。
Am Heart J Plus. 2022 Jan;13. doi: 10.1016/j.ahjo.2022.100123. Epub 2022 Mar 23.
4
An Evaluation of Follow-Up Activities of Participants From an Urban Prostate Cancer Screening Event.城市前列腺癌筛查活动参与者随访活动评估。
Am J Mens Health. 2019 Mar-Apr;13(2):1557988319844353. doi: 10.1177/1557988319844353.
5
Cancer screening information at community health fairs: What the participants do with information they receive.社区健康博览会上的癌症筛查信息:参与者如何处理他们收到的信息。
J Public Health Res. 2017 Sep 29;6(2):866. doi: 10.4081/jphr.2017.866. eCollection 2017 Sep 21.
6
Community-partnered research conference model: the experience of Community Partners in Care study.社区合作研究会议模式:社区护理合作伙伴研究的经验
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2014 Spring;8(1):83-97. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2014.0008.
7
Let's Get Healthy! Health awareness through public participation in an education and research exhibit.让我们保持健康!通过公众参与教育和研究展览提高健康意识。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2012 Fall;6(3):331-7. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2012.0041.