School of Psychological Sciences and Health, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK.
Autism. 2012 Sep;16(5):465-86. doi: 10.1177/1362361311411935. Epub 2011 Aug 2.
This paper presents a review of past and current research on the diagnosis of Asperger syndrome (AS) in children. It is suggested that the widely used criteria for diagnosing AS in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)-IV are insufficient and invalid for a reliable diagnosis of AS. In addition, when these diagnostic criteria are applied, there is the potential bias of receiving a diagnosis towards the high-functioning end of the autism spectrum. Through a critical review of 69 research studies carried out between 1981 and 2010, this paper shows that six possible criteria for diagnosing AS (specifically, the age at which signs and symptoms related to autism become apparent, language and social communication abilities, intellectual abilities, motor or movement skills, repetitive patterns of behaviour and the nature of social interaction) overlap with the criteria for diagnosing autism. However, there is a possibility that some finer differences exist in the nature of social interaction, motor skills and speech patterns between groups with a diagnosis of AS and autism. These findings are proposed to be of relevance for designing intervention studies aimed at the treatment of specific symptoms in people with an autism spectrum disorder.
本文回顾了过去和当前有关儿童阿斯伯格综合征(AS)诊断的研究。研究表明,《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》(DSM-IV)中用于诊断 AS 的广泛使用的标准对于 AS 的可靠诊断是不足和无效的。此外,在应用这些诊断标准时,存在将诊断偏向自闭症谱系高功能端的潜在偏见。通过对 1981 年至 2010 年间进行的 69 项研究的批判性回顾,本文表明,用于诊断 AS 的六个可能标准(具体来说,与自闭症相关的迹象和症状变得明显的年龄、语言和社交沟通能力、智力能力、运动或运动技能、重复行为模式和社交互动的性质)与自闭症的诊断标准重叠。然而,在具有 AS 和自闭症诊断的群体之间,社交互动、运动技能和言语模式的性质可能存在一些细微差异。这些发现对于设计旨在治疗自闭症谱系障碍患者特定症状的干预研究具有相关性。