Suppr超能文献

年度研究综述:重新思考自闭症谱系障碍的分类。

Annual research review: re-thinking the classification of autism spectrum disorders.

机构信息

Center for Autism and the Developing Brain, Weill-Cornell Medical College and New York Presbyterian Hospital/Westchester Division, White Plains, NY, USA.

出版信息

J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2012 May;53(5):490-509. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2012.02547.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The nosology of autism spectrum disorders (ASD) is at a critical point in history as the field seeks to better define dimensions of social-communication deficits and restricted/repetitive behaviors on an individual level for both clinical and neurobiological purposes. These different dimensions also suggest an increasing need for quantitative measures that accurately map their differences, independent of developmental factors such as age, language level and IQ.

METHOD

Psychometric measures, clinical observation as well as genetic, neurobiological and physiological research from toddlers, children and adults with ASD are reviewed.

RESULTS

The question of how to conceptualize ASDs along dimensions versus categories is discussed within the nosology of autism and the proposed changes to the DSM-5 and ICD-11. Differences across development are incorporated into the new classification frameworks.

CONCLUSIONS

It is crucial to balance the needs of clinical practice in ASD diagnostic systems, with neurobiologically based theories that address the associations between social-communication and restricted/repetitive dimensions in individuals. Clarifying terminology, improving description of the core features of ASD and other dimensions that interact with them and providing more valid and reliable ways to quantify them, both for research and clinical purposes, will move forward both practice and science.

摘要

背景

自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)的分类学正处于历史的关键时刻,该领域旨在为临床和神经生物学目的,更好地定义个体层面的社交沟通缺陷和受限/重复行为的维度。这些不同的维度也表明,越来越需要定量测量方法来准确地描绘它们的差异,而不受年龄、语言水平和智商等发育因素的影响。

方法

综述了自闭症分类学中关于维度与类别概念的心理测量方法、临床观察以及来自自闭症幼儿、儿童和成人的遗传、神经生物学和生理学研究。

结果

在自闭症的分类学中,讨论了如何沿着维度而非类别来概念化 ASDs 的问题,以及 DSM-5 和 ICD-11 的拟议修改。发展过程中的差异被纳入新的分类框架。

结论

在 ASD 诊断系统中,平衡临床实践的需求与基于神经生物学的理论至关重要,这些理论涉及个体社交沟通和受限/重复维度之间的关联。澄清术语,改善对 ASD 的核心特征和与之相互作用的其他维度的描述,并为研究和临床目的提供更有效和可靠的量化方法,将推动实践和科学的发展。

相似文献

2
Validation of proposed DSM-5 criteria for autism spectrum disorder.验证 DSM-5 自闭症谱系障碍诊断标准的有效性。
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2012 Jan;51(1):28-40.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2011.09.021. Epub 2011 Nov 21.
5
Sensitivity and specificity of proposed DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for autism spectrum disorder.DSM-5 自闭症谱系障碍诊断标准的敏感性和特异性。
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2012 Apr;51(4):368-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2012.01.007. Epub 2012 Mar 14.
7
Autism spectrum disorders.自闭症谱系障碍。
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2013 Feb;22 Suppl 1:S37-42. doi: 10.1007/s00787-012-0359-5.

引用本文的文献

9
Autism severity and its relationship to disability.自闭症严重程度及其与残疾的关系。
Autism Res. 2023 Apr;16(4):685-696. doi: 10.1002/aur.2898. Epub 2023 Feb 14.

本文引用的文献

2
Patterns of developmental trajectories in toddlers with autism spectrum disorder.自闭症谱系障碍幼儿发育轨迹模式。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2012 Jun;80(3):477-89. doi: 10.1037/a0027214. Epub 2012 Apr 16.
3
Sensitivity and specificity of proposed DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for autism spectrum disorder.DSM-5 自闭症谱系障碍诊断标准的敏感性和特异性。
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2012 Apr;51(4):368-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2012.01.007. Epub 2012 Mar 14.
7
Testing the construct validity of proposed criteria for DSM-5 autism spectrum disorder.测试 DSM-5 自闭症谱系障碍拟议标准的构念效度。
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2012 Jan;51(1):41-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2011.10.013. Epub 2011 Dec 3.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验