Suppr超能文献

投票站调查:一种在资源匮乏环境下减少 HIV 相关行为调查中社会期望偏差的新方法。

Polling booth surveys: a novel approach for reducing social desirability bias in HIV-related behavioural surveys in resource-poor settings.

机构信息

URESP, Centre de Recherche FRSQ du CHA Universitaire de Québec, Canada.

出版信息

AIDS Behav. 2012 May;16(4):1054-62. doi: 10.1007/s10461-011-0004-1.

Abstract

This study compared rates of HIV-related sexual risk behaviours reported in individual face-to-face (FTFI) and group anonymous polling booth (PBS) interviews in India. In PBS, respondents grouped by gender and marital status answered yes/no questions by putting tokens with question numbers in colour-coded containers. Data were subsequently collated for each group as a whole, so responses were not traceable back to individuals. Male and female PBS participants reported substantially higher rates of pre-marital, extra-marital, commercial and anal sex than FTFI participants; e.g. 11 vs. 2% married males reported paying for sex; 6 vs. 1% unmarried males reported homosexual anal sex.

摘要

本研究比较了在印度进行的个体面对面访谈(FTFI)和匿名团体投票站访谈(PBS)中报告的与 HIV 相关的性行为风险。在 PBS 中,根据性别和婚姻状况将受访者分组,他们通过将带有问题编号的代币放入颜色编码的容器中回答是/否问题。随后,为每个组整体汇总数据,因此无法追溯到个人的回答。PBS 的男性和女性参与者报告的婚前、婚外、商业和肛交性行为发生率明显高于 FTFI 参与者;例如,11%的已婚男性报告支付性服务费用,而 2%的未婚男性报告有同性肛交行为。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验