van Loosdrecht M C, Lyklema J, Norde W, Zehnder A J
Department of Microbiology, Agricultural University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Microbiol Rev. 1990 Mar;54(1):75-87. doi: 10.1128/mr.54.1.75-87.1990.
Bacterial adhesion in natural and artificial systems has been critically reviewed to investigate the influences exerted by the presence of interfaces. Numerous investigations have demonstrated that, in the presence of a solid phase, the activity of bacterial cultures is changed. Reviewing relevant literature, two problems were encountered. One is of an experimental nature. Due to lack of similarity in experimental conditions, disparate experiments often cannot be compared; their results may even appear conflicting. The other problem is of an interpretational nature: several hypothetical theories exist which try to explain the effect of surfaces on microbial activity. These theories often confuse changes in the medium and limitations in mass transfer which are due to the presence of solid surfaces (indirect influences) with changes in cell properties (direct influences). Whenever a surface is reported to influence the metabolism of bacteria, the action is found almost exclusively to be due to changes in the medium or environment and is therefore indirect. Based on data reported in the literature, and by using thermodynamic and kinetic considerations, it is concluded that so far neither experimental nor theoretical evidence exists for a direct influence of interfaces on microbial activity.
对自然和人工系统中的细菌黏附进行了严格审查,以研究界面的存在所产生的影响。大量研究表明,在存在固相的情况下,细菌培养物的活性会发生变化。在回顾相关文献时,遇到了两个问题。一个是实验性质的。由于实验条件缺乏相似性,不同的实验往往无法进行比较;它们的结果甚至可能显得相互矛盾。另一个问题是解释性质的:存在几种假设理论,试图解释表面对微生物活性的影响。这些理论常常将由于固体表面的存在而导致的介质变化和传质限制(间接影响)与细胞特性的变化(直接影响)混为一谈。每当有报道称表面会影响细菌的代谢时,几乎无一例外发现这种作用完全是由于介质或环境的变化,因此是间接的。根据文献报道的数据,并通过热力学和动力学考量得出结论,到目前为止,尚无实验证据或理论证据表明界面会对微生物活性产生直接影响。