Suppr超能文献

在一般精神科环境中,使用心境障碍问卷、轻躁狂清单-32 和临床预测因子对先前未识别的双相情感障碍进行筛查。

The use of Mood Disorder Questionnaire, Hypomania Checklist-32 and clinical predictors for screening previously unrecognised bipolar disorder in a general psychiatric setting.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, China.

出版信息

Psychiatry Res. 2012 Feb 28;195(3):111-7. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2011.07.014. Epub 2011 Aug 3.

Abstract

Bipolar disorder is often unrecognised and misdiagnosed in the general psychiatric setting. This study compared the psychometric properties of the Mood Disorder Questionnaire (MDQ) and the Hypomania Checklist-32 (HCL-32), examined the clinical predictors of bipolar disorder and determined the best approach for screening previously unrecognised bipolar disorder in a general psychiatric clinic. A random sample of 340 non-psychotic outpatients with no previous diagnosis of bipolar disorder completed the MDQ and HCL-32 during their scheduled clinic visits. Mood and alcohol/substance use disorders were reassessed using a telephone-based Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV. We found that the HCL-32 had better psychometric performance and discriminatory capacity than the MDQ. The HCL-32's internal consistency and 4-week test-retest reliability were higher. The area under the curve was also greater than that of the MDQ at various clustering and impairment criteria. The optimal cut-off of the MDQ was co-occurrence of four symptoms with omission of the impairment criterion; for the HCL-32, it was 11 affirmative responses. Multivariable logistic regression found that bipolar family history was associated with an increased risk of bipolar disorder (odds ratio=4.93). The study showed that simultaneous use of the HCL-32 and bipolar family history was the best approach for detecting previously unrecognised bipolar disorder.

摘要

双相情感障碍在普通精神科环境中经常未被识别和误诊。本研究比较了心境障碍问卷(MDQ)和轻躁狂检查表-32(HCL-32)的心理测量特性,探讨了双相情感障碍的临床预测因素,并确定了在普通精神科诊所筛查以前未被识别的双相情感障碍的最佳方法。随机抽取 340 名无躁狂障碍既往诊断的非精神病门诊患者,在预约就诊时完成 MDQ 和 HCL-32。使用基于电话的 DSM-IV 结构化临床访谈重新评估心境和酒精/物质使用障碍。我们发现 HCL-32 的心理测量性能和区分能力优于 MDQ。HCL-32 的内部一致性和 4 周测试重测信度更高。在各种聚类和损伤标准下,曲线下面积也大于 MDQ。MDQ 的最佳截断值为四个症状同时出现且不考虑损伤标准;对于 HCL-32,最佳截断值为 11 个肯定回答。多变量逻辑回归发现,双相家族史与双相情感障碍的风险增加相关(比值比=4.93)。研究表明,同时使用 HCL-32 和双相家族史是检测以前未被识别的双相情感障碍的最佳方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验