• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于人群的 4113 例急性胆囊炎患者分析:确定腹腔镜胆囊切除术的最佳时间点。

Population-based analysis of 4113 patients with acute cholecystitis: defining the optimal time-point for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

机构信息

Department of Visceral Surgery and Medicine, Inselspital, University Hospital Berne and University of Berne, CH-3010 Berne, Switzerland.

出版信息

Ann Surg. 2011 Dec;254(6):964-70. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318228d31c.

DOI:10.1097/SLA.0b013e318228d31c
PMID:21817893
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare clinical outcomes after laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) for acute cholecystitis performed at various time-points after hospital admission.

BACKGROUND

Symptomatic gallstones represent an important public health problem with LC the treatment of choice. LC is increasingly offered for acute cholecystitis, however, the optimal time-point for LC in this setting remains a matter of debate.

METHODS

Analysis was based on the prospective database of the Swiss Association of Laparoscopic and Thoracoscopic Surgery and included patients undergoing emergency LC for acute cholecystitis between 1995 and 2006, grouped according to the time-points of LC since hospital admission (admission day (d0), d1, d2, d3, d4/5, d ≥6). Linear and generalized linear regression models assessed the effect of timing of LC on intra- or postoperative complications, conversion and reoperation rates and length of postoperative hospital stay.

RESULTS

Of 4113 patients, 52.8% were female, median age was 59.8 years. Delaying LC resulted in significantly higher conversion rates (from 11.9% at d0 to 27.9% at d ≥6 days after admission, P < 0.001), surgical postoperative complications (5.7% to 13%, P < 0.001) and re-operation rates (0.9% to 3%, P = 0.007), with a significantly longer postoperative hospital stay (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Delaying LC for acute cholecystitis has no advantages, resulting in significantly increased conversion/re-operation rate, postoperative complications and longer postoperative hospital stay. This investigation-one of the largest in the literature-provides compelling evidence that acute cholecystitis merits surgery within 48 hours of hospital admission if impact on the patient and health care system is to be minimized.

摘要

目的

比较不同入院时间行腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)治疗急性胆囊炎的临床转归。

背景

有症状的胆囊结石是一个重要的公共卫生问题,LC 是其治疗的首选方法。LC 越来越多地用于治疗急性胆囊炎,但在这种情况下,LC 的最佳时机仍存在争议。

方法

分析基于瑞士腹腔镜和胸腔镜外科协会的前瞻性数据库,纳入 1995 年至 2006 年间因急性胆囊炎行急诊 LC 的患者,根据入院后行 LC 的时间点(入院日(d0)、d1、d2、d3、d4/5、d≥6)分组。线性和广义线性回归模型评估了 LC 时机对围手术期并发症、中转率和再手术率以及术后住院时间的影响。

结果

4113 例患者中,52.8%为女性,中位年龄为 59.8 岁。LC 时间延迟与中转率显著升高相关(从入院后 d0 的 11.9%增加到 d≥6 的 27.9%,P<0.001)、手术相关并发症(从 5.7%增加到 13%,P<0.001)和再手术率(从 0.9%增加到 3%,P=0.007),且术后住院时间显著延长(P<0.001)。

结论

急性胆囊炎行 LC 时间延迟并无优势,反而会显著增加中转/再手术率、术后并发症和术后住院时间。这项研究是文献中最大规模之一,提供了强有力的证据表明,为了减轻对患者和医疗系统的影响,急性胆囊炎应在入院后 48 小时内进行手术。

相似文献

1
Population-based analysis of 4113 patients with acute cholecystitis: defining the optimal time-point for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.基于人群的 4113 例急性胆囊炎患者分析:确定腹腔镜胆囊切除术的最佳时间点。
Ann Surg. 2011 Dec;254(6):964-70. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318228d31c.
2
Comparison of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy in aged acute calculous cholecystitis: a cohort study.老年急性结石性胆囊炎行腹腔镜胆囊切除术与延期腹腔镜胆囊切除术的比较:一项队列研究。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Jul;34(7):2994-3001. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07091-4. Epub 2019 Aug 28.
3
Evaluation of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the treatment of acute cholecystitis.早期与延迟腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎的疗效评估。
Hepatogastroenterology. 2009 Jan-Feb;56(89):26-8.
4
Delayed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Acute Calculous Cholecystitis: Is it Time for a Change?急性结石性胆囊炎的延迟腹腔镜胆囊切除术:是时候做出改变了吗?
World J Surg. 2017 Jul;41(7):1762-1768. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-3928-4.
5
Risk factors for perioperative complications in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: analysis of 22,953 consecutive cases from the Swiss Association of Laparoscopic and Thoracoscopic Surgery database.腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者围手术期并发症的危险因素:对瑞士腹腔镜与胸腔镜外科学会数据库中22953例连续病例的分析
J Am Coll Surg. 2006 Nov;203(5):723-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.07.018. Epub 2006 Sep 20.
6
Timing of early laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis.急性胆囊炎早期腹腔镜胆囊切除术的时机
JSLS. 2008 Jul-Sep;12(3):282-7.
7
Comparison of Early and Interval Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Treatment of Acute Cholecystitis. Which is Better? A Multicentered Study.早期与间隔期腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎的比较。哪种更好?一项多中心研究。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2016 Dec;26(6):e117-e121. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000345.
8
Emergency laparoscopic cholecystectomy in an unselected cohort: a safe and viable option in a specialist centre.在一个专科中心,对未经选择的患者队列实施紧急腹腔镜胆囊切除术:一种安全可行的选择。
Int J Surg. 2010;8(6):489-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.06.015. Epub 2010 Jul 13.
9
Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the preferred management of acute cholecystitis.早期腹腔镜胆囊切除术是急性胆囊炎的首选治疗方法。
Arch Surg. 2008 Jun;143(6):533-7. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.143.6.533.
10
Optimal time for early laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis.急性胆囊炎行早期腹腔镜胆囊切除术的最佳时机。
JAMA Surg. 2015 Feb;150(2):129-36. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2014.2339.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative Analysis of Complications in Early Verses Delayed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis.急性胆囊炎早期与延迟腹腔镜胆囊切除术并发症的比较分析
Cureus. 2025 Feb 14;17(2):e78985. doi: 10.7759/cureus.78985. eCollection 2025 Feb.
2
Multicenter analysis of the efficacy of early cholecystectomy and preoperative cholecystostomy for severe acute cholecystitis: a retrospective study of data from the multi-institutional database of the Hiroshima Surgical Study Group of Clinical Oncology.早期胆囊切除术与术前胆囊造瘘术治疗重症急性胆囊炎疗效的多中心分析:一项基于广岛临床肿瘤外科研究组多机构数据库数据的回顾性研究
BMC Gastroenterol. 2024 Oct 1;24(1):338. doi: 10.1186/s12876-024-03420-7.
3
A critical view: Examining disparities regarding timely cholecystectomy.
批判视角:胆囊切除术及时性差异研究
Surgery. 2024 Nov;176(5):1345-1351. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2024.07.021. Epub 2024 Aug 31.
4
Timely cholecystectomy: important factors to improve guideline adherence and patient treatment.及时行胆囊切除术:提高指南依从性和患者治疗效果的重要因素。
BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2024 Jul 24;11(1):e001439. doi: 10.1136/bmjgast-2024-001439.
5
Association of education with cholelithiasis and mediating effects of cardiometabolic factors: A Mendelian randomization study.教育与胆结石的关联及心脏代谢因素的中介作用:一项孟德尔随机化研究
World J Clin Cases. 2024 Jul 16;12(20):4272-4288. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i20.4272.
6
Advances in the management of gallbladder polyps: establishment of predictive models and the rise of gallbladder-preserving polypectomy procedures.胆囊息肉管理的新进展:预测模型的确立和保胆息肉切除术的兴起。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2024 Jan 2;24(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12876-023-03094-7.
7
Severe acute cholecystitis successfully treated with endoscopic nasobiliary drainage tube insertion: A case report.经内镜鼻胆管引流管置入术成功治疗重症急性胆囊炎:一例报告
SAGE Open Med Case Rep. 2023 Nov 16;11:2050313X231212303. doi: 10.1177/2050313X231212303. eCollection 2023.
8
The Optimal Timing of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Acute Cholecystitis: A Single-Center Study.急性胆囊炎行腹腔镜胆囊切除术的最佳时机:一项单中心研究
Cureus. 2023 May 11;15(5):e38915. doi: 10.7759/cureus.38915. eCollection 2023 May.
9
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: Any time is a good time.腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎:任何时候都是好时机。
Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2023 Aug 31;27(3):271-276. doi: 10.14701/ahbps.22-127. Epub 2023 Apr 24.
10
Administrative codes may have limited utility in diagnosing biliary colic in emergency department visits: A validation study.行政编码在急诊科就诊时诊断胆绞痛方面的效用可能有限:一项验证性研究。
Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2022 Aug 31;26(3):277-280. doi: 10.14701/ahbps.21-171. Epub 2022 Jul 19.