Suppr超能文献

老年急性结石性胆囊炎行腹腔镜胆囊切除术与延期腹腔镜胆囊切除术的比较:一项队列研究。

Comparison of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy in aged acute calculous cholecystitis: a cohort study.

机构信息

Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, Shengjing Hospital Affiliated With China Medical University, Liaoning, China.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2020 Jul;34(7):2994-3001. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07091-4. Epub 2019 Aug 28.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In elderly patients with calculous acute cholecystitis, the risk of emergency surgery is high, and percutaneous cholecystostomy tube drainage (PC) combined with delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy (DLC) may be a good choice. We retrospectively compared laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) to DLC after PC to determine which is the better treatment strategy.

METHOD

We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of 752 patients with acute calculous cholecystitis. Patients with the following conditions were included: (1) age > 65 years old; (2) patients with a grade 2 or 3 severity of cholecystitis according to the 2013 Tokyo Guidelines (TG13); (3) the surgeons who performed the LC were professors or associate professors and (4) the DLC was performed in our hospital after PC. Patients who missed their 30-day follow-up; were diagnosed with bile duct stones, cholangitis or gallstone pancreatitis or were pregnant were excluded from the study. A total of 51 of 314 patients who underwent LC and 73 of 438 patients who underwent PC + DLC were assessed. PC + DLC and LC patients were matched by cholecystitis severity grade according to the TG13, and the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) calculator was used to predict mortality (n = 21/group). Preoperative characteristics and postoperative outcomes were analysed.

RESULTS

Compared to the matched LC group, the DLC group had less intraoperative bleeding (42.2 vs 75.3 mL, p = 0.014), shorter hospital stays (4.9 vs 7.4 days, p = 0.010) and lower rates of type A bile duct injury (4.8% vs 14.3%, p = 0.035) and type D (0 vs 9.5%, p = 0.002) according to Strasberg classification, residual stones (4.8 vs 14.3%, p = 0.035) and gastrointestinal organ injury (0 vs 3.6%, p < 0.001). Patients in the DLC group had lower incidences of ICU admission and death and a significantly lower incidence of repeat surgery.

CONCLUSION

In elderly patients treated for acute calculous cholecystitis, the 30-day mortality and complication rates were lower for PC + DLC than for LC. However, the total hospitalisation time was significantly prolonged and the costs were significantly higher for PC + DLC.

摘要

背景

在老年结石性胆囊炎患者中,急诊手术风险较高,经皮胆囊穿刺引流(PC)联合延期腹腔镜胆囊切除术(DLC)可能是一种较好的选择。我们回顾性比较了 PC 后行腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)与 DLC,以确定哪种治疗策略更好。

方法

我们对 752 例急性结石性胆囊炎患者进行了回顾性队列分析。纳入标准为:(1)年龄>65 岁;(2)根据 2013 年东京指南(TG13),胆囊炎严重程度为 2 级或 3 级;(3)行 LC 的外科医生为教授或副教授;(4)PC 后在我院行 DLC。失访 30 天的患者;诊断为胆管结石、胆管炎或胆石性胰腺炎或妊娠的患者被排除在研究之外。共评估了 314 例行 LC 的患者中的 51 例和 438 例行 PC+DLC 的患者中的 73 例。根据 TG13 按胆囊炎严重程度对 PC+DLC 患者和 LC 患者进行匹配,使用国家手术质量改进计划(NSQIP)计算器预测死亡率(n=21/组)。分析术前特征和术后结果。

结果

与匹配的 LC 组相比,DLC 组术中出血量更少(42.2 比 75.3 mL,p=0.014),住院时间更短(4.9 比 7.4 天,p=0.010),胆管损伤 A 型(4.8%比 14.3%,p=0.035)和 D 型(0 比 9.5%,p=0.002)、残余结石(4.8%比 14.3%,p=0.035)和胃肠道器官损伤(0 比 3.6%,p<0.001)发生率更低。DLC 组患者 ICU 入住率和死亡率较低,再次手术发生率显著降低。

结论

在接受急性结石性胆囊炎治疗的老年患者中,PC+DLC 的 30 天死亡率和并发症发生率低于 LC。然而,PC+DLC 的总住院时间明显延长,且费用明显增加。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验