• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

21 基因检测在淋巴结阳性早期乳腺癌中的成本效益。

Cost-effectiveness of 21-gene assay in node-positive, early-stage breast cancer.

机构信息

Partnership for Health Analytic Research, Beverly Hills, CA 90212, USA.

出版信息

Am J Manag Care. 2011;17(7):455-64.

PMID:21819166
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess impact on health outcomes and healthcare expenditures of adopting a 21-gene assay for women with early-stage, minimally node-positive, estrogen receptor-positive (N (1-3)/ER) HER2-negative breast cancer.

STUDY DESIGN

We adapted a deterministic decision-analytic model to estimate costs and quality-of-life outcomes associated with chemotherapy, adverse events, supportive care, recurrence, and second primary cancers for usual care compared with care determined by the 21-gene assay recurrence score, where 71% and 54% of women, respectively, were treated with adjuvant chemotherapy. Model input data were based on national statistics, published literature, physician surveys, and Medicare Part B prices.

METHODS

Annual numbers of events were multiplied by quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) lost and costs to estimate net health and economic impacts of each strategy. Analyses were from a managed care payer perspective for the US population.

RESULTS

Patients receiving the assay were predicted to gain 0.127 QALY and save $4359 annually from avoiding chemotherapy, adverse events, supportive care, and secondary primary tumors. For a 2-million member plan, net gains were 4.44 QALYs/year and savings were $13,476/year. Cost savings were greater for the Medicare population. Although overall results were sensitive only to reduced impact of testing and chemotherapy costs, they were still highly cost-effective (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio <$20,000/QALY).

CONCLUSIONS

Use of a 21-gene assay in patients with early-stage N (1-3)/ER HER2-negative breast cancer may improve health outcomes and add no incremental cost, thereby providing valuable insight for health plans, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, and clinicians regarding coverage policies and treatment decisions.

摘要

目的

评估采用 21 基因检测对早期、淋巴结转移 1-3 个且雌激素受体阳性(N(1-3)/ER)、HER2 阴性乳腺癌患者的健康结局和医疗支出的影响。

研究设计

我们改编了一个确定性决策分析模型,以评估与化疗、不良反应事件、支持性护理、复发和第二原发癌相关的成本和生活质量结果,比较了常规护理和 21 基因检测复发评分决定的护理,分别有 71%和 54%的女性接受辅助化疗。模型输入数据基于国家统计数据、已发表文献、医生调查和医疗保险 B 部分价格。

方法

每年事件的数量乘以丧失的质量调整生命年(QALY)和成本,以估计每种策略的净健康和经济影响。分析基于美国管理式医疗支付者的角度。

结果

预计接受检测的患者通过避免化疗、不良反应事件、支持性护理和第二原发肿瘤,每年可增加 0.127 个 QALY 并节省 4359 美元。对于一个 200 万成员的计划,每年净增益为 4.44 QALY/年,节省 13476 美元/年。医疗保险人群的成本节约更大。尽管总体结果仅对检测和化疗成本的影响降低敏感,但它们仍然具有高度成本效益(增量成本效益比<20000 美元/QALY)。

结论

在早期 N(1-3)/ER HER2 阴性乳腺癌患者中使用 21 基因检测可能改善健康结局且不增加额外成本,从而为健康计划、医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心以及临床医生提供有关覆盖政策和治疗决策的宝贵见解。

相似文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of 21-gene assay in node-positive, early-stage breast cancer.21 基因检测在淋巴结阳性早期乳腺癌中的成本效益。
Am J Manag Care. 2011;17(7):455-64.
2
Using the 21-gene assay to guide adjuvant chemotherapy decision-making in early-stage breast cancer: a cost-effectiveness evaluation in the German setting.采用 21 基因检测指导早期乳腺癌辅助化疗决策:德国环境下的成本效益评估。
J Med Econ. 2013;16(1):30-40. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2012.722572. Epub 2012 Sep 11.
3
US insurance program's experience with a multigene assay for early-stage breast cancer.美国保险计划在早期乳腺癌多基因检测方面的经验。
Am J Manag Care. 2011 May 1;17(5 Spec No):e194-202.
4
Cost-effectiveness of extended adjuvant letrozole therapy after 5 years of adjuvant tamoxifen therapy in postmenopausal women with early-stage breast cancer.他莫昔芬辅助治疗5年后,来曲唑延长辅助治疗对绝经后早期乳腺癌女性的成本效益分析。
Am J Manag Care. 2006 Jul;12(7):374-86.
5
Impact of a 21-gene RT-PCR assay on treatment decisions in early-stage breast cancer: an economic analysis based on prognostic and predictive validation studies.21基因逆转录聚合酶链反应检测对早期乳腺癌治疗决策的影响:基于预后和预测验证研究的经济学分析
Cancer. 2007 Mar 15;109(6):1011-8. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22506.
6
Economic evaluation of 21-gene reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction assay in lymph-node-negative, estrogen-receptor-positive, early-stage breast cancer in Japan.日本淋巴结阴性、雌激素受体阳性早期乳腺癌21基因逆转录聚合酶链反应检测法的经济学评估
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008 Nov;112(1):175-87. doi: 10.1007/s10549-007-9842-y. Epub 2007 Dec 13.
7
Is adjuvant therapy for older patients with node (+) early breast cancer cost-effective?辅助治疗对老年淋巴结阳性早期乳腺癌患者是否具有成本效益?
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2005 Nov;94(2):95-103. doi: 10.1007/s10549-004-8267-0.
8
Economic evaluation of the 21-gene signature (Oncotype DX) in lymph node-negative/positive, hormone receptor-positive early-stage breast cancer based on Japanese validation study (JBCRG-TR03).基于日本验证研究(JBCRG-TR03)的淋巴结阴性/阳性、激素受体阳性早期乳腺癌 21 基因标志物(Oncotype DX)的经济学评价。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011 Jun;127(3):739-49. doi: 10.1007/s10549-010-1243-y. Epub 2010 Nov 17.
9
Assessing the potential cost-effectiveness of retesting IHC0, IHC1+, or FISH-negative early stage breast cancer patients for HER2 status.评估对 HER2 状态为 IHC0、IHC1+ 或 FISH 阴性的早期乳腺癌患者进行重新检测的潜在成本效益。
Cancer. 2013 Sep 1;119(17):3113-22. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28196. Epub 2013 Jun 17.
10
Economic evaluation of intensive chemotherapy with prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for patients with high-risk early breast cancer in Japan.日本高危早期乳腺癌患者强化化疗联合预防性粒细胞集落刺激因子的经济学评价。
Clin Ther. 2010 Feb;32(2):311-26. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2010.01.029.

引用本文的文献

1
Economic Assessment in Resource-Constrained Systems: Individual-Level Simulation Model in Wet Age-Related Macular Degeneration and Diabetic Macular Oedema.资源受限系统中的经济评估:湿性年龄相关性黄斑变性和糖尿病性黄斑水肿的个体水平模拟模型
Ophthalmol Ther. 2024 Oct;13(10):2577-2597. doi: 10.1007/s40123-024-00999-8. Epub 2024 Aug 6.
2
Recommendations from the European Commission Initiative on Breast Cancer for multigene testing to guide the use of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with early breast cancer, hormone receptor positive, HER-2 negative.欧盟委员会乳腺癌倡议就多基因检测提出的建议,以指导激素受体阳性、HER-2阴性的早期乳腺癌患者辅助化疗的使用。
Br J Cancer. 2021 Apr;124(9):1503-1512. doi: 10.1038/s41416-020-01247-z. Epub 2021 Feb 18.
3
Gene Expression Profiling Tests for Early-Stage Invasive Breast Cancer: A Health Technology Assessment.早期浸润性乳腺癌的基因表达谱检测:一项卫生技术评估
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2020 Mar 6;20(10):1-234. eCollection 2020.
4
Cost-utility analysis of 21-gene assay for node-positive early breast cancer.21基因检测用于淋巴结阳性早期乳腺癌的成本效用分析。
Curr Oncol. 2019 Oct;26(5):307-318. doi: 10.3747/co.26.4769. Epub 2019 Oct 1.
5
Accounting for Capacity Constraints in Economic Evaluations of Precision Medicine: A Systematic Review.考虑精准医学经济评估中的产能约束:系统综述。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2019 Aug;37(8):1011-1027. doi: 10.1007/s40273-019-00801-9.
6
Systems biology approaches to identify disease mechanisms and facilitate targeted therapy in the management of glomerular disease.系统生物学方法在肾小球疾病管理中用于识别疾病机制并促进靶向治疗。
Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2018 Nov;27(6):433-439. doi: 10.1097/MNH.0000000000000446.
7
Cost-Effectiveness Analyses of the 21-Gene Assay in Breast Cancer: Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal.乳腺癌 21 基因检测的成本效益分析:系统评价与关键评估。
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Jun 1;36(16):1619-1627. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.76.5941. Epub 2018 Apr 16.
8
Towards decision-making using individualized risk estimates for personalized medicine: A systematic review of genomic classifiers of solid tumors.迈向使用个性化风险评估进行精准医疗决策:实体瘤基因组分类器的系统综述
PLoS One. 2017 May 9;12(5):e0176388. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176388. eCollection 2017.
9
Health Economic Impact and Prospective Clinical Utility of Oncotype DX® Genomic Prostate Score.Oncotype DX®基因组前列腺评分的健康经济影响及潜在临床应用价值
Rev Urol. 2016;18(3):123-132. doi: 10.3909/riu0725.
10
Breast cancer multigene testing trends and impact on chemotherapy use.乳腺癌多基因检测趋势及其对化疗应用的影响。
Am J Manag Care. 2016 May 1;22(5):e153-60.