Kondo Masahide, Hoshi Shu Ling, Ishiguro Hiroshi, Yoshibayashi Hiroshi, Toi Masakazu
Department of Health Care Policy and Management, Graduate School of Comprehensive Human Sciences, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennoudai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8577, Japan.
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008 Nov;112(1):175-87. doi: 10.1007/s10549-007-9842-y. Epub 2007 Dec 13.
The 21-gene reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction assay with a patented algorithm is validated as a good predictor of prognosis and potential benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy for lymph-node-negative, estrogen-receptor-positive, early-stage breast cancer, while its high cost raises concern about how to finance it. Cost-effectiveness analysis comparing prevalent National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guideline/St Gallen recommendation-guided treatment with the assay-guided treatment is carried out with budget impact estimation in the context of Japan's health care system. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios are estimated as 2,997,495 yen/QALY (26,065 US$/QALY) in the comparison between NCCN guided-treatment vs. the assay-guided treatment, and as 1,239,055 yen/QALY (10,774 US$/QALY) in the comparison between St Gallen guided-treatment vs. the assay-guided treatment. Budget impact is estimated as yen2,638 million (US$23 million) to yen3,225 million (US$28 million) per year. The routine use of the assay is indicated as cost-effective. And the budget impact could be judged as within fundable level.
采用专利算法的21基因逆转录酶-聚合酶链反应检测方法,已被证实可很好地预测淋巴结阴性、雌激素受体阳性的早期乳腺癌患者的预后及辅助化疗的潜在获益,但其高昂的成本引发了对如何支付费用的担忧。在日本医疗体系背景下,开展了成本效益分析,比较了普遍采用的美国国立综合癌症网络(NCCN)指南/圣加伦推荐指导下的治疗与该检测方法指导下的治疗,并进行了预算影响估计。NCCN指导下的治疗与该检测方法指导下的治疗相比较,增量成本效益比估计为2,997,495日元/质量调整生命年(26,065美元/质量调整生命年);圣加伦指导下的治疗与该检测方法指导下的治疗相比较,增量成本效益比估计为1,239,055日元/质量调整生命年(10,774美元/质量调整生命年)。预算影响估计为每年26.38亿日元(2300万美元)至32.25亿日元(2800万美元)。该检测方法的常规使用被认为具有成本效益。而且预算影响可被判定在可承受范围内。