• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与急诊科镇静期间未能成功完成手术相关的因素。

Factors associated with failure to successfully complete a procedure during emergency department sedation.

机构信息

Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

Emerg Med Australas. 2011 Aug;23(4):474-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2011.01420.x. Epub 2011 May 17.

DOI:10.1111/j.1742-6723.2011.01420.x
PMID:21824315
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine factors associated with failure to successfully complete a procedure during sedation in the ED.

METHODS

Eleven Australian EDs enrolled consecutive adult and paediatric patients between January 2006 and December 2008. Patients were included if a sedative drug was administered for an ED procedure and the success or failure of the procedure was recorded.

RESULTS

Data were available for 2567 patients. Of these, 1548 (60.3%, 95% CI 58.4-62.2) were male and 456 (17.8%, 95% CI 16.3-19.3) were age <16 years. The most common procedures performed were reduction of major joints and laceration repair. A total of 149 procedures (5.8%, 95% CI 5.0-6.8) failed. There were significant differences in failure rates between the types of procedure undertaken, with reduction of hips, digits and mandibles associated with the highest failure rates (P < 0.001). In adults, body weight >100 kg was also associated with increased risk of procedural failure (odds ratio 2.3, 95% CI 1.3-4.1). Ketamine used as a single agent had the lowest procedural failure rate (2.5%, 95% CI 1.1-5.4) whereas propofol had the highest (5.9%, 95% CI 4.6-7.6). However, these two drugs were generally used in different age groups and for different procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

Procedures performed under sedation in the ED have a low failure rate. However, increased body weight and specific procedures, such as hip reduction, are associated with significantly higher failure rates. Special consideration should be given to these patient groups before undertaking sedation in the ED.

摘要

目的

确定在急诊科镇静时程序失败相关的因素。

方法

2006 年 1 月至 2008 年 12 月,11 家澳大利亚急诊科连续纳入接受镇静药物的成年和儿科患者。如果记录到镇静药物的 ED 程序成功或失败,则将患者纳入研究。

结果

2567 例患者的数据可用。其中,1548 例(60.3%,95%CI 58.4-62.2)为男性,456 例(17.8%,95%CI 16.3-19.3)年龄<16 岁。最常见的操作是大关节复位和撕裂伤修复。共 149 次操作(5.8%,95%CI 5.0-6.8)失败。操作类型之间的失败率存在显著差异,髋关节、指关节和下颌骨复位的失败率最高(P<0.001)。在成人中,体重>100kg 与操作失败风险增加相关(比值比 2.3,95%CI 1.3-4.1)。单独使用氯胺酮的操作失败率最低(2.5%,95%CI 1.1-5.4),而丙泊酚的失败率最高(5.9%,95%CI 4.6-7.6)。然而,这两种药物通常用于不同的年龄组和不同的操作。

结论

急诊科镇静下进行的操作失败率较低。然而,体重增加和特定的操作,如髋关节复位,与显著更高的失败率相关。在急诊科进行镇静之前,应特别考虑这些患者群体。

相似文献

1
Factors associated with failure to successfully complete a procedure during emergency department sedation.与急诊科镇静期间未能成功完成手术相关的因素。
Emerg Med Australas. 2011 Aug;23(4):474-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2011.01420.x. Epub 2011 May 17.
2
Risk factors for sedation-related events during procedural sedation in the emergency department.在急诊科进行有创性镇静期间镇静相关事件的风险因素。
Emerg Med Australas. 2011 Aug;23(4):466-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2011.01419.x. Epub 2011 May 17.
3
Procedural sedation practices in Australian Emergency Departments.澳大利亚急诊科的程序性镇静实践。
Emerg Med Australas. 2011 Aug;23(4):458-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2011.01418.x. Epub 2011 May 17.
4
Randomized clinical trial of propofol versus ketamine for procedural sedation in the emergency department.异丙酚与氯胺酮用于急诊科操作镇静的随机临床试验。
Acad Emerg Med. 2010 Jun;17(6):604-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2010.00776.x.
5
Safe and efficacious use of procedural sedation and analgesia by nonanesthesiologists in a pediatric emergency department.非麻醉医生在儿科急诊科安全有效地使用程序性镇静和镇痛。
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2003 Nov;157(11):1090-6. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.157.11.1090.
6
Recall after procedural sedation in the emergency department.急诊科程序性镇静后的回忆。
Emerg Med J. 2007 May;24(5):322-4. doi: 10.1136/emj.2006.040923.
7
Paediatric procedural sedation based on nitrous oxide and ketamine: sedation registry data from Australia.基于一氧化二氮和氯胺酮的儿科程序镇静:来自澳大利亚的镇静登记数据。
Emerg Med J. 2010 Aug;27(8):607-12. doi: 10.1136/emj.2009.084384. Epub 2010 Jun 1.
8
Randomized clinical trial of etomidate versus propofol for procedural sedation in the emergency department.急诊科依托咪酯与丙泊酚用于程序镇静的随机临床试验
Ann Emerg Med. 2007 Jan;49(1):15-22. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.06.042. Epub 2006 Sep 25.
9
Pediatric Procedural Sedation in the Community Emergency Department: results from the ProSCED registry.社区急诊科的儿科程序性镇静:ProSCED 登记处的结果
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2007 Apr;23(4):218-22. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e31803e176c.
10
Propofol for emergency department procedural sedation and analgesia: a tale of three centers.丙泊酚用于急诊科程序性镇静和镇痛:三个中心的故事
Acad Emerg Med. 2006 Jan;13(1):24-30. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2005.08.011. Epub 2005 Dec 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Safety and Efficacy of Using Fracture Tables for Prosthetic Hip Dislocations.使用骨折手术台治疗人工髋关节脱位的安全性和有效性
Arthroplast Today. 2021 May 31;9:89-92. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2021.04.004. eCollection 2021 Jun.
2
Procedural sedation in the emergency department by Dutch emergency physicians: a prospective multicentre observational study of 1711 adults.荷兰急诊科医生实施的急诊程序镇静:一项针对1711名成年人的前瞻性多中心观察性研究。
Emerg Med J. 2017 Apr;34(4):237-242. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2016-205767. Epub 2016 Oct 21.