• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

澳大利亚急诊科的程序性镇静实践。

Procedural sedation practices in Australian Emergency Departments.

机构信息

Queen Elizabeth II Jubilee Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

出版信息

Emerg Med Australas. 2011 Aug;23(4):458-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2011.01418.x. Epub 2011 May 17.

DOI:10.1111/j.1742-6723.2011.01418.x
PMID:21824313
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study was to describe procedural sedation practices undertaken in a spectrum of Australian EDs.

METHODS

Eleven Australian EDs enrolled consecutive adult and paediatric patients between January 2006 and December 2008. Patients were included if a sedative drug was administered for an ED procedure. Data collection was prospective and used a specifically designed data collection document.

RESULTS

2623 patients were enrolled. 1581 were male (60.3%, 95% CI 58.4-62.2) and the mean patient age was 39.2 (SD 25.2) years. Reductions of fracture/dislocated shoulders (694 cases, 26.7%), wrist/forearm fractures (403, 15.5%) and tibia/fibula fractures (341, 13.1%) were the most common procedures. Procedures were supervised by consultants and registrars in 1424 (54.3%) and 1025 (39.1%) cases, respectively. Of 2413 patients with complete fasting status data, 1252 (51.9%, 95% CI 49.9-53.9) patients had consumed food or fluid in the previous 6 h. 1399 (53.3%, 95% CI 51.4-55.3) patients received pre-procedural medication. Pre-procedural morphine (894, 34.1%) exceeded fentanyl use (323, 12.3%), both as a sole agent and in combination with another agent. The principal sedatives used alone were propofol (857, 38.5%), midazolam (224, 10%) and ketamine (165, 7.4%). Ketamine and nitrous oxide were most commonly used in children with propofol, midazolam and opiates largely restricted to adults (P < 0.001). The intra-procedural use of adjunct fentanyl exceeded that of morphine (ratio 4:1).

CONCLUSIONS

Procedural sedation practice across Australian EDs is varies considerably. Procedural sedation 'best practice' guidelines, based upon the findings of the present study and the available evidence, are recommended.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在描述澳大利亚一系列急诊部实施的程序镇静实践。

方法

2006 年 1 月至 2008 年 12 月期间,11 家澳大利亚急诊部连续纳入成年和儿科患者。如果镇静药物用于急诊部程序,则纳入患者。数据收集是前瞻性的,使用了专门设计的数据收集文件。

结果

共纳入 2623 例患者。男性 1581 例(60.3%,95%CI 58.4-62.2),平均年龄 39.2(SD 25.2)岁。肩部(694 例,26.7%)、腕部/前臂(403 例,15.5%)和胫骨/腓骨(341 例,13.1%)骨折脱位复位是最常见的程序。2413 例患者中有完整禁食状态数据,1252 例(51.9%,95%CI 49.9-53.9)患者在 6 小时内进食或液体。1399 例(53.3%,95%CI 51.4-55.3)患者接受了术前用药。术前使用吗啡(894 例,34.1%)超过了芬太尼(323 例,12.3%),两者均为单独用药和联合用药。单独使用的主要镇静剂是丙泊酚(857 例,38.5%)、咪达唑仑(224 例,10%)和氯胺酮(165 例,7.4%)。氯胺酮和一氧化二氮在儿童中最常与丙泊酚、咪达唑仑和阿片类药物联合使用,而后者主要限于成人(P < 0.001)。术中辅助使用芬太尼超过了吗啡(比例为 4:1)。

结论

澳大利亚急诊部的程序镇静实践差异很大。建议根据本研究结果和现有证据制定程序镇静“最佳实践”指南。

相似文献

1
Procedural sedation practices in Australian Emergency Departments.澳大利亚急诊科的程序性镇静实践。
Emerg Med Australas. 2011 Aug;23(4):458-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2011.01418.x. Epub 2011 May 17.
2
Risk factors for sedation-related events during procedural sedation in the emergency department.在急诊科进行有创性镇静期间镇静相关事件的风险因素。
Emerg Med Australas. 2011 Aug;23(4):466-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2011.01419.x. Epub 2011 May 17.
3
Pediatric Procedural Sedation in the Community Emergency Department: results from the ProSCED registry.社区急诊科的儿科程序性镇静:ProSCED 登记处的结果
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2007 Apr;23(4):218-22. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e31803e176c.
4
Contemporary sedation practice in a large New Zealand emergency department.新西兰一家大型急诊科的当代镇静实践。
N Z Med J. 2011 Oct 14;124(1344):36-45.
5
Procedural sedation in children in the emergency department: a PREDICT study.急诊科儿童程序性镇静:一项预测性研究。
Emerg Med Australas. 2009 Feb;21(1):71-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2008.01150.x.
6
Safe and efficacious use of procedural sedation and analgesia by nonanesthesiologists in a pediatric emergency department.非麻醉医生在儿科急诊科安全有效地使用程序性镇静和镇痛。
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2003 Nov;157(11):1090-6. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.157.11.1090.
7
Paediatric procedural sedation based on nitrous oxide and ketamine: sedation registry data from Australia.基于一氧化二氮和氯胺酮的儿科程序镇静:来自澳大利亚的镇静登记数据。
Emerg Med J. 2010 Aug;27(8):607-12. doi: 10.1136/emj.2009.084384. Epub 2010 Jun 1.
8
Factors associated with failure to successfully complete a procedure during emergency department sedation.与急诊科镇静期间未能成功完成手术相关的因素。
Emerg Med Australas. 2011 Aug;23(4):474-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2011.01420.x. Epub 2011 May 17.
9
Procedural sedation in the community emergency department: initial results of the ProSCED registry.社区急诊科的程序性镇静:ProSCED 登记处的初步结果。
Acad Emerg Med. 2007 Jan;14(1):41-6. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2006.05.023. Epub 2006 Aug 31.
10
Randomized clinical trial of propofol versus ketamine for procedural sedation in the emergency department.异丙酚与氯胺酮用于急诊科操作镇静的随机临床试验。
Acad Emerg Med. 2010 Jun;17(6):604-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2010.00776.x.

引用本文的文献

1
A study protocol for a feasibility study: Propofol Target-Controlled Infusion in Emergency Department Sedation (ProTEDS)-a multi-centre feasibility study protocol.一项可行性研究的研究方案:急诊科镇静中丙泊酚靶控输注(ProTEDS)——一项多中心可行性研究方案。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2019 Feb 18;5:27. doi: 10.1186/s40814-019-0412-y. eCollection 2019.
2
Intramuscular midazolam for pediatric sedation in the emergency department: a short communication on clinical safety and effectiveness.急诊科小儿镇静用肌内注射咪达唑仑:关于临床安全性和有效性的简短通讯
Trauma Mon. 2012 Spring;17(1):233-5. doi: 10.5812/traumamon.3458. Epub 2012 May 26.
3
Additive effect of propofol and fentanyl precipitating cardiogenic shock.
丙泊酚和芬太尼联合作用引发心源性休克。
J Pharmacol Pharmacother. 2013 Jul;4(3):217-9. doi: 10.4103/0976-500X.114612.