• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在急诊科进行有创性镇静期间镇静相关事件的风险因素。

Risk factors for sedation-related events during procedural sedation in the emergency department.

机构信息

Austin Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Emerg Med Australas. 2011 Aug;23(4):466-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2011.01419.x. Epub 2011 May 17.

DOI:10.1111/j.1742-6723.2011.01419.x
PMID:21824314
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the nature, incidence and risk factors for sedation-related events during ED procedural sedation, with particular focus on the drugs administered.

METHODS

Eleven Australian EDs enrolled consecutive adult and paediatric patients between January 2006 and December 2008. Patients were included if a sedative drug was administered for an ED procedure. Data collection was prospective and employed a specifically designed form. Multivariate logistic regression was employed to determine risk factors for sedation-related events.

RESULTS

Two thousand, six hundred and twenty-three patients were enrolled (60.3% male, mean age 39.2 years). Reductions of fracture/dislocations of shoulders, wrists and ankles were most common. Four hundred and sixty-one (17.6%) cases experienced at least one airway event that required intervention. Airway obstruction, hypoventilation and desaturation occurred in 12.7%, 6.4% and 3.7% of all patients, respectively. Two thousand, one hundred and forty-six cases had complete datasets for further analyses. Increasing age and level of sedation, pre-medication with fentanyl, and sedation with propofol, midazolam or fentanyl were risk factors for an airway event (P < 0.05). Ketamine was a protective factor. Hypotension (systolic pressure <80 mmHg) occurred in 34 (1.6%) cases with midazolam being a significant risk factor (P < 0.001). Vomiting also occurred in 34 (1.6%) cases, 12 of whom required an intervention. One patient aspirated. Vomiting occurred after administration of all drugs but was not associated with fasting status. Other events were rare.

CONCLUSIONS

Sedation-related events, especially airway events, are common but very rarely have an adverse outcome. Elderly patients, deeply sedated with short-acting agents, are at particular risk. The results will help tailor sedation to individual patients.

摘要

目的

确定急诊程序镇静相关事件的性质、发生率和危险因素,特别关注所用药物。

方法

2006 年 1 月至 2008 年 12 月,11 家澳大利亚急诊室连续纳入成年和儿科患者。如果镇静药物用于急诊程序,则纳入患者。数据采集是前瞻性的,并采用专门设计的表格。采用多变量逻辑回归确定镇静相关事件的危险因素。

结果

共纳入 2623 例患者(60.3%为男性,平均年龄 39.2 岁)。减少肩部、腕部和踝部骨折/脱位最为常见。461 例(17.6%)至少发生 1 次需要干预的气道事件。气道阻塞、通气不足和血氧饱和度下降分别发生在所有患者的 12.7%、6.4%和 3.7%。2146 例患者有完整的数据集进行进一步分析。年龄增长和镇静程度增加、使用芬太尼预用药、使用异丙酚、咪达唑仑或芬太尼镇静是气道事件的危险因素(P<0.05)。氯胺酮是保护因素。使用咪达唑仑时发生低血压(收缩压<80mmHg)的有 34 例(1.6%),是一个显著的危险因素(P<0.001)。呕吐也发生在 34 例(1.6%)患者中,其中 12 例需要干预。1 例患者发生误吸。所有药物使用后均发生呕吐,但与禁食状态无关。其他事件很少见。

结论

镇静相关事件,特别是气道事件很常见,但很少有不良后果。老年患者、使用短效药物深度镇静时风险特别高。结果将有助于针对个体患者调整镇静。

相似文献

1
Risk factors for sedation-related events during procedural sedation in the emergency department.在急诊科进行有创性镇静期间镇静相关事件的风险因素。
Emerg Med Australas. 2011 Aug;23(4):466-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2011.01419.x. Epub 2011 May 17.
2
Profiling adverse respiratory events and vomiting when using propofol for emergency department procedural sedation.在急诊科使用丙泊酚进行程序性镇静时分析不良呼吸事件和呕吐情况。
Emerg Med Australas. 2007 Oct;19(5):405-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2007.00982.x.
3
Adverse events associated with procedural sedation and analgesia in a pediatric emergency department: a comparison of common parenteral drugs.儿科急诊科与程序性镇静和镇痛相关的不良事件:常用注射药物的比较。
Acad Emerg Med. 2005 Jun;12(6):508-13. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2004.12.009.
4
Procedural sedation practices in Australian Emergency Departments.澳大利亚急诊科的程序性镇静实践。
Emerg Med Australas. 2011 Aug;23(4):458-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2011.01418.x. Epub 2011 May 17.
5
Safe and efficacious use of procedural sedation and analgesia by nonanesthesiologists in a pediatric emergency department.非麻醉医生在儿科急诊科安全有效地使用程序性镇静和镇痛。
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2003 Nov;157(11):1090-6. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.157.11.1090.
6
Does midazolam alter the clinical effects of intravenous ketamine sedation in children? A double-blind, randomized, controlled, emergency department trial.咪达唑仑会改变儿童静脉注射氯胺酮镇静的临床效果吗?一项双盲、随机、对照的急诊科试验。
Ann Emerg Med. 2000 Dec;36(6):579-88. doi: 10.1067/mem.2000.111131.
7
Propofol for emergency department procedural sedation and analgesia: a tale of three centers.丙泊酚用于急诊科程序性镇静和镇痛:三个中心的故事
Acad Emerg Med. 2006 Jan;13(1):24-30. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2005.08.011. Epub 2005 Dec 19.
8
Procedural sedation with propofol: a retrospective review of the experiences of an emergency medicine residency program 2005 to 2010.异丙酚镇静的程序:2005 年至 2010 年急诊住院医师培训项目的经验回顾。
Am J Emerg Med. 2012 Jun;30(5):706-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2011.04.002. Epub 2011 Jun 8.
9
Procedural sedation and analgesia outcomes in children after discharge from the emergency department: ketamine versus fentanyl/midazolam.急诊科出院后儿童程序性镇静和镇痛的效果:氯胺酮与芬太尼/咪达唑仑的比较
Ann Emerg Med. 2009 Aug;54(2):191-97.e1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2009.04.015. Epub 2009 May 22.
10
Randomized clinical trial of propofol versus ketamine for procedural sedation in the emergency department.异丙酚与氯胺酮用于急诊科操作镇静的随机临床试验。
Acad Emerg Med. 2010 Jun;17(6):604-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2010.00776.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Deep Sedation in High-risk Patients Undergoing Emergency Upper GI Endoscopy: A Retrospective Study Assessing Safety and Effectiveness.急诊上消化道内镜检查高危患者的深度镇静:一项评估安全性和有效性的回顾性研究
Transl Med UniSa. 2024 Dec 26;26(2):164-168. doi: 10.37825/2239-9747.1067. eCollection 2024.
2
Procedural Sedation in the Emergency Department - An Observational Study: Does Nil Per Os Status Matter?急诊科的程序性镇静——一项观察性研究:禁食状态重要吗?
West J Emerg Med. 2025 Mar;26(2):200-209. doi: 10.5811/westjem.18561.
3
Non-fasting versus fasting before percutaneous cardiac procedures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
经皮心脏手术前非空腹与空腹状态的比较:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Perioper Med (Lond). 2025 Feb 28;14(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s13741-024-00485-6.
4
Ultrasound guided pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block resulting in reduction of dislocated prosthetic hip.超声引导下关节囊周围神经组(PENG)阻滞导致人工髋关节脱位复位。
Anaesth Rep. 2025 Jan 7;13(1):e70000. doi: 10.1002/anr3.70000. eCollection 2025 Jan-Jun.
5
Korean clinical practice guidelines for diagnostic and procedural sedation.韩国诊断及操作镇静临床实践指南。
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2024 Feb;77(1):5-30. doi: 10.4097/kja.23745. Epub 2023 Nov 16.
6
Application of Bispectral Index System (BIS) Monitor to Ambulatory Pediatric Dental Patients under Intravenous Deep Sedation.双谱指数系统(BIS)监测仪在门诊静脉深度镇静下小儿牙科患者中的应用。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 May 18;13(10):1789. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13101789.
7
A mini-review of procedural sedation and analgesia in the emergency department.急诊科程序性镇静与镇痛的小型综述
Acute Med Surg. 2020 Oct 6;7(1):e574. doi: 10.1002/ams2.574. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec.
8
Multimorbidity and Critical Care Neurosurgery: Minimizing Major Perioperative Cardiopulmonary Complications.多发病共存与神经重症监护:减少围手术期主要心肺并发症
Neurocrit Care. 2021 Jun;34(3):1047-1061. doi: 10.1007/s12028-020-01072-5. Epub 2020 Aug 13.
9
Capsule Endoscopy Transit Time to Duodenum: Relation to Patient Demographics.胶囊内镜到达十二指肠的转运时间:与患者人口统计学特征的关系。
Cureus. 2020 Feb 5;12(2):e6894. doi: 10.7759/cureus.6894.
10
Procedural sedation and analgesia in the emergency department in Japan: interim analysis of multicenter prospective observational study.日本急诊科的程序性镇静和镇痛:多中心前瞻性观察研究的中期分析。
J Anesth. 2019 Apr;33(2):238-249. doi: 10.1007/s00540-018-02606-0. Epub 2019 Jan 7.