Suppr超能文献

替拉瑞韦联合聚乙二醇干扰素和利巴韦林治疗日本慢性 HCV 基因 1 型初治患者

Telaprevir with peginterferon and ribavirin for treatment-naive patients chronically infected with HCV of genotype 1 in Japan.

机构信息

Department of Hepatology, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

J Hepatol. 2012 Jan;56(1):78-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2011.07.016. Epub 2011 Aug 7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of telaprevir in combination with peginterferon-α2b (PEG-IFN) and ribavirin (RBV) in patients with chronic hepatitis C.

METHODS

In a multi-center randomized clinical trial in Japan, on patients infected with HCV of genotype 1, 126 patients were assigned to telaprevir for 12 weeks along with PEG-IFN and RBV for 24 weeks (Group A), while 63 to PEG-IFN and RBV for 48 weeks (Group B).

RESULTS

HCV RNA disappeared more swiftly in patients in Group A than B, and the frequency of patients without detectable HCV RNA at week 4 (rapid virological response (RVR)) was higher in Group A than B (84.0% vs. 4.8%, p <0.0001). Grade 3 and 4 skin disorders, including Stevens-Johnson syndrome and drug rashes with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms, as well as Grade 3 anemia (<8.0 g/dl), occurred more frequently in Group A than B (skin disorders, 11.9% vs. 4.8%; anemia, 11.1% vs. 0.0%). The total RBV dose was smaller in Group A than B (47.0% vs. 77.7% of the target, p <0.0001). Despite these drawbacks, sustained virological response (SVR) was achieved more frequently in Group A than B (73.0% vs. 49.2%, p=0.0020).

CONCLUSIONS

Although the triple therapy with telaprevir-based regimen for 24 weeks resulted in more adverse events and less total RBV dose than PEG-IFN and RBV for 48 weeks, it was able to achieve higher SVR within shorter duration by carefully monitoring adverse events and modifying the RBV dose as required.

摘要

背景与目的

评估替拉瑞韦联合聚乙二醇干扰素-α2b(PEG-IFN)和利巴韦林(RBV)治疗慢性丙型肝炎患者的疗效和安全性。

方法

在日本进行的一项多中心随机临床试验中,126 例 HCV 基因型 1 感染患者被分配接受替拉瑞韦治疗 12 周,同时接受 PEG-IFN 和 RBV 治疗 24 周(A 组),而 63 例患者接受 PEG-IFN 和 RBV 治疗 48 周(B 组)。

结果

A 组患者的 HCV RNA 消失速度快于 B 组,第 4 周无检测到 HCV RNA 的患者(快速病毒学应答(RVR))比例也高于 B 组(84.0%比 4.8%,p<0.0001)。A 组比 B 组更常发生 3 级和 4 级皮肤疾病,包括 Stevens-Johnson 综合征和药物皮疹伴嗜酸性粒细胞增多和全身症状,以及 3 级贫血(<8.0 g/dl)(皮肤疾病,11.9%比 4.8%;贫血,11.1%比 0.0%)。A 组的总 RBV 剂量低于 B 组(47.0%比 77.7%的目标剂量,p<0.0001)。尽管存在这些缺点,但 A 组的持续病毒学应答(SVR)比例高于 B 组(73.0%比 49.2%,p=0.0020)。

结论

虽然替拉瑞韦为基础的三联疗法治疗 24 周比 PEG-IFN 和 RBV 治疗 48 周导致更多的不良反应和更少的总 RBV 剂量,但通过仔细监测不良反应和根据需要调整 RBV 剂量,能够在更短的时间内获得更高的 SVR。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验