Department of Psychiatry, Clinical Neuroscience Research Unit, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Neuropharmacology. 2012 Jan;62(1):63-77. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2011.07.036. Epub 2011 Aug 3.
Half a century after the first formulation of the monoamine hypothesis, compelling evidence implies that long-term changes in an array of brain areas and circuits mediating complex cognitive-emotional behaviors represent the biological underpinnings of mood/anxiety disorders. A large number of clinical studies suggest that pathophysiology is associated with dysfunction of the predominant glutamatergic system, malfunction in the mechanisms regulating clearance and metabolism of glutamate, and cytoarchitectural/morphological maladaptive changes in a number of brain areas mediating cognitive-emotional behaviors. Concurrently, a wealth of data from animal models have shown that different types of environmental stress enhance glutamate release/transmission in limbic/cortical areas and exert powerful structural effects, inducing dendritic remodeling, reduction of synapses and possibly volumetric reductions resembling those observed in depressed patients. Because a vast majority of neurons and synapses in these areas and circuits use glutamate as neurotransmitter, it would be limiting to maintain that glutamate is in some way 'involved' in mood/anxiety disorders; rather it should be recognized that the glutamatergic system is a primary mediator of psychiatric pathology and, potentially, also a final common pathway for the therapeutic action of antidepressant agents. A paradigm shift from a monoamine hypothesis of depression to a neuroplasticity hypothesis focused on glutamate may represent a substantial advancement in the working hypothesis that drives research for new drugs and therapies. Importantly, despite the availability of multiple classes of drugs with monoamine-based mechanisms of action, there remains a large percentage of patients who fail to achieve a sustained remission of depressive symptoms. The unmet need for improved pharmacotherapies for treatment-resistant depression means there is a large space for the development of new compounds with novel mechanisms of action such as glutamate transmission and related pathways. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled 'Anxiety and Depression'.
半个世纪前,单胺假说首次提出,大量确凿的证据表明,介导复杂认知-情绪行为的一系列大脑区域和回路的长期变化代表了心境/焦虑障碍的生物学基础。大量临床研究表明,病理生理学与主要谷氨酸能系统的功能障碍、调节谷氨酸清除和代谢的机制故障以及介导认知-情绪行为的许多大脑区域的细胞结构/形态适应性变化有关。同时,大量来自动物模型的研究表明,不同类型的环境压力增强了边缘/皮质区域的谷氨酸释放/传递,并产生了强大的结构效应,诱导树突重塑、突触减少,并且可能会发生类似于抑郁患者中观察到的体积减少。由于这些区域和回路中的绝大多数神经元和突触都使用谷氨酸作为神经递质,因此,如果认为谷氨酸以某种方式“参与”了心境/焦虑障碍,那将是有限的;相反,应该认识到谷氨酸能系统是精神病理学的主要介质,并且可能也是抗抑郁药物治疗作用的最终共同途径。从抑郁症的单胺假说到以谷氨酸为重点的神经可塑性假说的范式转变,可能是推动新药和疗法研究的工作假说的重大进展。重要的是,尽管有多种具有单胺作用机制的药物,但仍有很大一部分患者无法持续缓解抑郁症状。对于治疗抵抗性抑郁症的改善药物治疗存在未满足的需求,这意味着有很大的空间可以开发具有新作用机制的新化合物,如谷氨酸传递和相关途径。本文是题为“焦虑和抑郁”的特刊的一部分。