Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital, College of Medicine, Dongguk University, Siksa-dong, Goyang, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.
Complement Ther Med. 2011 Aug;19(4):187-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2011.06.004. Epub 2011 Jul 16.
To determine the efficacy and safety of a sericite which emits far infrared rays in the management of primary dysmenorrhea.
A multicenter randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial.
One hundred four patients with primary dysmenorrhea were randomized to wear a sericite or placebo belt during sleep for 3 menstrual cycles, and followed for 2 menstrual cycles. Hot packs were used to heat the ceramics and ensure slight pain relief in both groups.
The main outcome measures were the severity of dysmenorrhea assessed by a 10-point visual analog scale (VAS) and the number of patients who took analgesics at each menstrual cycle. Safety was evaluated by physical examination and self-reporting of adverse events.
The baseline VAS scores were 7.27±0.19 in the experimental group and 7.38±0.19 in the control group. The severity of dysmenorrhea gradually decreased during the treatment period in both groups, with major improvements observed in the third treatment cycle (4.96±0.30 in the experimental group and 5.69±0.30 in the control group, p=0.087). During the follow-up period, the decreased VAS score was maintained in the experimental group, whereas the VAS score gradually returned to baseline in the control group, which resulted in significant difference between the groups (5.08±0.31 vs. 6.47±0.31 at cycle 5, difference -1.39 [95% CI, -2.25 to -0.53], p=0.0017). The number of patients who took analgesics decreased in both groups, but the differences were not statistically significant. No serious adverse events related to wearing the sericite belt occurred.
Our data suggest that a far infrared-emitting sericite belt with a hot pack might be used as an effective and safe non-pharmacologic treatment option for women with primary dysmenorrhea, with a prolonged effect after treatment.
观察远红外陶瓷纤维布(简称远红外布)暖宫带治疗原发性痛经的疗效和安全性。
多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照临床试验。
104 例原发性痛经患者随机分为实验组(使用远红外布暖宫带)和对照组(使用安慰剂暖宫带),于夜间睡眠时佩戴 3 个月经周期,随访 2 个月经周期。两组均采用热袋加热陶瓷片,以保证轻微缓解疼痛。
主要观察指标为视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评价的痛经严重程度和每个月经周期需要使用镇痛药的患者例数。安全性通过体格检查和患者不良反应报告进行评估。
实验组和对照组治疗前 VAS 评分分别为 7.27±0.19 和 7.38±0.19。两组痛经程度均随治疗逐渐减轻,第 3 个治疗周期改善明显(实验组 4.96±0.30,对照组 5.69±0.30,p=0.087)。随访期内实验组 VAS 评分逐渐下降,而对照组逐渐回升,两组间差异有统计学意义(第 5 个周期 VAS 评分实验组 5.08±0.31,对照组 6.47±0.31,差值-1.39,95%可信区间-2.25 至-0.53,p=0.0017)。两组镇痛药使用例数均减少,但差异无统计学意义。未见与佩戴远红外布暖宫带相关的严重不良事件。
远红外布暖宫带配合热袋可能是一种治疗原发性痛经的有效、安全的非药物方法,治疗结束后疗效可维持较长时间。