Weldon School of Biomedical Engineering, Purdue University, USA.
Nanotechnology. 2011 Sep 2;22(35):355502. doi: 10.1088/0957-4484/22/35/355502. Epub 2011 Aug 9.
This work addresses the comparison of different strategies for improving biosensor performance using nanomaterials. Glucose biosensors based on commonly applied enzyme immobilization approaches, including sol-gel encapsulation approaches and glutaraldehyde cross-linking strategies, were studied in the presence and absence of multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWNTs). Although direct comparison of design parameters such as linear range and sensitivity is intuitive, this comparison alone is not an accurate indicator of biosensor efficacy, due to the wide range of electrodes and nanomaterials available for use in current biosensor designs. We proposed a comparative protocol which considers both the active area available for transduction following nanomaterial deposition and the sensitivity. Based on the protocol, when no nanomaterials were involved, TEOS/GOx biosensors exhibited the highest efficacy, followed by BSA/GA/GOx and TMOS/GOx biosensors. A novel biosensor containing carboxylated MWNTs modified with glucose oxidase and an overlying TMOS layer demonstrated optimum efficacy in terms of enhanced current density (18.3 ± 0.5 µA mM(-1) cm(-2)), linear range (0.0037-12 mM), detection limit (3.7 µM), coefficient of variation (2%), response time (less than 8 s), and stability/selectivity/reproducibility. H(2)O(2) response tests demonstrated that the most possible reason for the performance enhancement was an increased enzyme loading. This design is an excellent platform for versatile biosensing applications.
这项工作针对使用纳米材料提高生物传感器性能的不同策略进行了比较。研究了基于常用酶固定化方法(包括溶胶-凝胶包埋方法和戊二醛交联策略)的葡萄糖生物传感器,同时存在和不存在多壁碳纳米管(MWNTs)的情况下。虽然直接比较设计参数,如线性范围和灵敏度是直观的,但由于目前生物传感器设计中可用的电极和纳米材料范围广泛,这种比较本身并不是生物传感器功效的准确指标。我们提出了一种比较方案,该方案同时考虑了纳米材料沉积后可用于转导的有效面积和灵敏度。根据该方案,在不涉及纳米材料的情况下,TEOS/GOx 生物传感器的功效最高,其次是 BSA/GA/GOx 和 TMOS/GOx 生物传感器。一种新型生物传感器,含有羧基化 MWNTs 修饰的葡萄糖氧化酶和覆盖 TMOS 层,在增强的电流密度(18.3±0.5 µA mM(-1) cm(-2))、线性范围(0.0037-12 mM)、检测限(3.7 µM)、变异系数(2%)、响应时间(小于 8 s)和稳定性/选择性/重现性方面表现出最佳功效。H(2)O(2) 响应测试表明,性能提高的最可能原因是酶载量增加。该设计是多功能生物传感应用的优秀平台。