The University of Oklahoma College of Pharmacy, Oklahoma City, 73190, USA.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2011 Jun 10;75(5):83. doi: 10.5688/ajpe75583.
To continue efforts of quality assurance following a 5-year curricular mapping and course peer review process, 18 topics ("streams") of knowledge, skills, and attitudes were assessed across the doctor of pharmacy (PharmD) curriculum.
The curriculum committee merged the 18 topics into 9 streams. Nine ad hoc committees ("stream teams") of faculty members and preceptors evaluated the content, integration, and assessment for their assigned streams across the 4 professional years. Committees used a reporting tool and curriculum database to complete their reviews.
After each team presented their findings and recommendations at a faculty retreat, the 45 faculty members were asked to list their top priorities for curriculum improvement. The 5 top priorities identified were: redefinition and clarification of program outcomes; improved coordination of streams across the curriculum; consistent repetition and assessment of math skills throughout the curriculum; focused nonprescription and self-care teaching into an individual course; and improved development of problem solving.
This comprehensive assessment enabled the college to identify areas for curriculum improvement that were not readily apparent to the faculty from prior reviews of individual courses.
在进行了 5 年的课程映射和课程同行评审后,继续努力进行质量保证,对药剂学博士(PharmD)课程中的 18 个知识、技能和态度主题进行了评估。
课程委员会将 18 个主题合并为 9 个流。9 个特别委员会(“流团队”)的教师和导师评估了他们在 4 个专业学年中分配的流的内容、整合和评估。委员会使用报告工具和课程数据库完成了他们的审查。
在每个团队在教师务虚会上介绍了他们的发现和建议后,45 名教师被要求列出他们对课程改进的首要任务。确定的前 5 项优先事项是:重新定义和澄清课程目标;改进课程中流的协调;在整个课程中一致重复和评估数学技能;将非处方和自我保健教学集中到一门课程中;以及改进解决问题的能力。
这种全面的评估使学院能够确定课程改进的领域,这些领域是教师从之前对个别课程的审查中不容易发现的。