• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项验证语法和语音筛查(GAPS)测试以识别特定语言障碍儿童的研究。

An investigation to validate the grammar and phonology screening (GAPS) test to identify children with specific language impairment.

机构信息

Laboratoire de Neuropsychologie Interventionnelle, Department Études Cognitive, École Normale Supérieure, Paris, France.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2011;6(7):e22432. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0022432. Epub 2011 Jul 28.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0022432
PMID:21829461
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3145645/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The extraordinarily high incidence of grammatical language impairments in developmental disorders suggests that this uniquely human cognitive function is "fragile". Yet our understanding of the neurobiology of grammatical impairments is limited. Furthermore, there is no "gold-standard" to identify grammatical impairments and routine screening is not undertaken. An accurate screening test to identify grammatical abilities would serve the research, health and education communities, further our understanding of developmental disorders, and identify children who need remediation, many of whom are currently un-diagnosed. A potential realistic screening tool that could be widely administered is the Grammar and Phonology Screening (GAPS) test--a 10 minute test that can be administered by professionals and non-professionals alike. Here we provide a further step in evaluating the validity and accuracy (sensitivity and specificity) of the GAPS test in identifying children who have Specific Language Impairment (SLI).

METHODS AND FINDINGS

We tested three groups of children; two groups aged 3;6-6:6, a typically developing (n = 30) group, and a group diagnosed with SLI: (n = 11) (Young (Y)-SLI), and a further group aged 6;9-8;11 with SLI (Older (O)-SLI) (n = 10) who were above the test age norms. We employed a battery of language assessments including the GAPS test to assess the children's language abilities. For Y-SLI children, analyses revealed a sensitivity and specificity at the 5(th) and 10(th) percentile of 1.00 and 0.98, respectively, and for O-SLI children at the 10(th) and 15(th) percentile .83 and .90, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings reveal that the GAPS is highly accurate in identifying impaired vs. non-impaired children up to 6;8 years, and has moderate-to-high accuracy up to 9 years. The results indicate that GAPS is a realistic tool for the early identification of grammatical abilities and impairment in young children. A larger investigation is warranted in children with SLI and other developmental disorders.

摘要

背景

发育障碍中语法语言损伤的极高发病率表明,这种独特的人类认知功能是“脆弱的”。然而,我们对语法损伤的神经生物学的理解是有限的。此外,没有“金标准”来识别语法损伤,也没有进行常规筛查。一个准确的筛查测试来识别语法能力将服务于研究、健康和教育界,进一步了解发育障碍,并确定需要补救的儿童,其中许多儿童目前未被诊断。一个潜在的现实筛选工具,可以广泛管理是语法和音韵筛查(GAPS)测试-一个 10 分钟的测试,可以由专业人士和非专业人士管理。在这里,我们提供了一个进一步的步骤,以评估 GAPS 测试的有效性和准确性(灵敏度和特异性),以识别有特定语言损伤(SLI)的儿童。

方法和发现

我们测试了三组儿童;两组年龄为 3 岁;6-6:6,一个典型的发展(n=30)组,和一个被诊断为 SLI 的组:(n=11)(年轻(Y)-SLI),以及一个年龄较大的 6 岁;9-8 岁;11 岁的 SLI 组(老年(O)-SLI)(n=10),他们超过了测试年龄标准。我们采用了一系列语言评估,包括 GAPS 测试,以评估儿童的语言能力。对于 Y-SLI 儿童,分析显示,5%和 10%百分位数的灵敏度和特异性分别为 1.00 和 0.98,而对于 O-SLI 儿童,在 10%和 15%百分位数分别为 0.83 和 0.90。

结论

研究结果表明,GAPS 在识别 6 岁至 8 岁受损和非受损儿童方面具有高度准确性,在 9 岁时具有中等至高度准确性。结果表明,GAPS 是一种现实的工具,用于早期识别幼儿的语法能力和损伤。在有 SLI 和其他发育障碍的儿童中,需要进行更大的调查。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa2e/3145645/ec4ff53cf0b6/pone.0022432.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa2e/3145645/42a4e7cabd88/pone.0022432.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa2e/3145645/61a529a6edd0/pone.0022432.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa2e/3145645/ec4ff53cf0b6/pone.0022432.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa2e/3145645/42a4e7cabd88/pone.0022432.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa2e/3145645/61a529a6edd0/pone.0022432.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa2e/3145645/ec4ff53cf0b6/pone.0022432.g003.jpg

相似文献

1
An investigation to validate the grammar and phonology screening (GAPS) test to identify children with specific language impairment.一项验证语法和语音筛查(GAPS)测试以识别特定语言障碍儿童的研究。
PLoS One. 2011;6(7):e22432. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0022432. Epub 2011 Jul 28.
2
Development of the Grammar and Phonology Screening (GAPS) test to assess key markers of specific language and literacy difficulties in young children.语法和语音筛查(GAPS)测试的开发,用于评估幼儿特定语言和读写困难的关键指标。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2006 Sep-Oct;41(5):513-40. doi: 10.1080/13682820500442644.
3
Grammar predicts procedural learning and consolidation deficits in children with Specific Language Impairment.语法可预测特定语言障碍儿童在程序性学习和巩固方面的缺陷。
Res Dev Disabil. 2011 Nov-Dec;32(6):2362-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2011.07.026. Epub 2011 Aug 12.
4
Evidence for a grammar-specific deficit in children.儿童存在特定语法缺陷的证据。
Curr Biol. 1998 Nov 19;8(23):1253-8. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(07)00534-9.
5
Clinical markers in Italian-speaking children with and without specific language impairment: a study of non-word and real word repetition as predictors of grammatical ability.意大利语儿童与非特定语言障碍儿童的临床指标:作为语法能力预测指标的非词和真词重复研究。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2013 Sep-Oct;48(5):554-64. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12032. Epub 2013 Jul 5.
6
Non-word repetition in adolescents with specific language impairment (SLI).特定语言障碍(SLI)青少年的非词重复。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2012 May-Jun;47(3):257-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-6984.2011.00099.x. Epub 2012 Mar 5.
7
What do children with specific language impairment do with multiple forms of DO?特定语言损伤儿童如何处理多种形式的 DO?
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2013 Feb;56(1):222-35. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2012/11-0107). Epub 2012 Jun 28.
8
Communication, listening, cognitive and speech perception skills in children with auditory processing disorder (APD) or Specific Language Impairment (SLI).听觉处理障碍(APD)或特定语言障碍(SLI)儿童的沟通、倾听、认知和言语感知技能。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2011 Feb;54(1):211-27. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2010/09-0167). Epub 2010 Aug 5.
9
Phonological and morphophonological effects on grammatical development in children with specific language impairment.语音及形态音位对特定语言障碍儿童语法发展的影响。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2015 Jul;50(4):516-28. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12152. Epub 2015 Feb 19.
10
Evaluating the GAPS test as a screener for language impairment in young children.评估GAPS测试作为幼儿语言障碍筛查工具的效果。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2011 Nov-Dec;46(6):675-685. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-6984.2011.00038.x. Epub 2011 May 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Screening Tools for Language Disorder.语言障碍筛查工具的系统评价与荟萃分析
Front Pediatr. 2022 Feb 23;10:801220. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.801220. eCollection 2022.
2
The Complex Relation between Executive Functions and Language in Preschoolers with Developmental Language Disorders.发育性语言障碍学龄前儿童执行功能与语言的复杂关系。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 9;17(5):1772. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17051772.
3
A systematic review on diagnostic procedures for specific language impairment: The sensitivity and specificity issues.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluating the GAPS test as a screener for language impairment in young children.评估GAPS测试作为幼儿语言障碍筛查工具的效果。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2011 Nov-Dec;46(6):675-685. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-6984.2011.00038.x. Epub 2011 May 11.
2
Who did Buzz see someone? Grammaticality judgement of wh-questions in typically developing children and children with Grammatical-SLI.巴斯看到了谁?发育正常儿童和患有语法特定语言障碍儿童对特殊疑问句的语法判断。
Lingua. 2011 Feb;121(3):408-422. doi: 10.1016/j.lingua.2010.10.007.
3
Which neurodevelopmental disorders get researched and why?
关于特定语言障碍诊断程序的系统评价:敏感性和特异性问题。
J Res Med Sci. 2016 Sep 1;21:67. doi: 10.4103/1735-1995.189648. eCollection 2016.
哪些神经发育障碍得到了研究,为什么?
PLoS One. 2010 Nov 30;5(11):e15112. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0015112.
4
Assessing component language deficits in the early detection of reading difficulty risk.评估组成语言缺陷在早期发现阅读困难风险中的作用。
J Learn Disabil. 2010 Jul-Aug;43(4):357-68. doi: 10.1177/0022219410369078. Epub 2010 May 17.
5
Recent advances in the genetics of language impairment.语言障碍遗传学的最新进展。
Genome Med. 2010 Jan 26;2(1):6. doi: 10.1186/gm127.
6
Specific language impairment and school outcomes. I: identifying and explaining variability at the end of compulsory education.特定语言障碍与学业成果。I:义务教育结束时的变异性识别与解释
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2009 Jan-Feb;44(1):15-35. doi: 10.1080/13682820801921601.
7
Electrical brain responses in language-impaired children reveal grammar-specific deficits.语言障碍儿童的脑电反应揭示了特定于语法的缺陷。
PLoS One. 2008 Mar 12;3(3):e1832. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0001832.
8
Further defining the language impairment of autism: is there a specific language impairment subtype?进一步界定自闭症的语言障碍:是否存在特定的语言障碍亚型?
J Commun Disord. 2008 Jul-Aug;41(4):319-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2008.01.002. Epub 2008 Jan 20.
9
Intervention for verb argument structure in children with persistent SLI: a randomized control trial.针对持续性特定语言障碍儿童动词论元结构的干预:一项随机对照试验。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2007 Oct;50(5):1330-49. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2007/093).
10
Language and communication difficulties in juvenile offenders.青少年罪犯的语言和沟通障碍。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2007 Sep-Oct;42(5):505-20. doi: 10.1080/13682820601053977.