Unit for Speech and Language Pathology, Department of Neuroscience, University of Uppsala, PO Box 256, SE-751 05 Uppsala, Sweden.
Res Dev Disabil. 2011 Nov-Dec;32(6):2362-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2011.07.026. Epub 2011 Aug 12.
The Procedural Deficit Hypothesis (PDH) posits that Specific Language Impairment (SLI) can be largely explained by abnormalities of brain structures that subserve procedural memory. The PDH predicts impairments of procedural memory itself, and that such impairments underlie the grammatical deficits observed in the disorder. Previous studies have indeed reported procedural learning impairments in SLI, and have found that these are associated with grammatical difficulties. The present study extends this research by examining consolidation and longer-term procedural sequence learning in children with SLI. The Alternating Serial Reaction Time (ASRT) task was given to children with SLI and typically developing (TD) children in an initial learning session and an average of three days later to test for consolidation and longer-term learning. Although both groups showed evidence of initial sequence learning, only the TD children showed clear signs of consolidation, even though the two groups did not differ in longer-term learning. When the children were re-categorized on the basis of grammar deficits rather than broader language deficits, a clearer pattern emerged. Whereas both the grammar impaired and normal grammar groups showed evidence of initial sequence learning, only those with normal grammar showed consolidation and longer-term learning. Indeed, the grammar-impaired group appeared to lose any sequence knowledge gained during the initial testing session. These findings held even when controlling for vocabulary or a broad non-grammatical language measure, neither of which were associated with procedural memory. When grammar was examined as a continuous variable over all children, the same relationships between procedural memory and grammar, but not vocabulary or the broader language measure, were observed. Overall, the findings support and further specify the PDH. They suggest that consolidation and longer-term procedural learning are impaired in SLI, but that these impairments are specifically tied to the grammatical deficits in the disorder. The possibility that consolidation and longer-term learning are problematic in the disorder suggests a locus of potential study for therapeutic approaches. In sum, this study clarifies our understanding of the underlying deficits in SLI, and suggests avenues for further research.
程序性缺陷假说(PDH)认为,特定语言障碍(SLI)可以在很大程度上解释为程序性记忆所服务的大脑结构异常。PDH 预测程序性记忆本身的损伤,并且这种损伤是该障碍中观察到的语法缺陷的基础。以前的研究确实报告了 SLI 中的程序性学习损伤,并发现这些损伤与语法困难有关。本研究通过检查 SLI 儿童的巩固和长期程序性序列学习来扩展该研究。在初始学习会议和平均三天后,将交替序列反应时间(ASRT)任务提供给 SLI 和典型发育(TD)儿童,以测试巩固和长期学习。尽管两组都表现出初始序列学习的证据,但只有 TD 儿童表现出明显的巩固迹象,尽管两组在长期学习中没有差异。当根据语法缺陷而不是更广泛的语言缺陷对儿童进行重新分类时,出现了更清晰的模式。虽然语法受损和正常语法组都表现出初始序列学习的证据,但只有那些具有正常语法的组显示出巩固和长期学习。事实上,语法受损组似乎失去了在初始测试会议期间获得的任何序列知识。即使在控制词汇或广泛的非语法语言测量时,这些发现仍然成立,而这些都与程序性记忆无关。当语法作为所有儿童的连续变量进行检查时,在程序性记忆和语法之间观察到相同的关系,但词汇或更广泛的语言测量则没有。总体而言,这些发现支持并进一步具体说明了 PDH。它们表明巩固和长期程序性学习在 SLI 中受损,但这些损伤与该障碍中的语法缺陷有特定的联系。巩固和长期学习在该障碍中存在问题的可能性表明了治疗方法的潜在研究重点。总之,这项研究阐明了我们对 SLI 中潜在缺陷的理解,并为进一步研究提供了途径。