• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与心力衰竭的糖尿病患者个体使用磺脲类药物相关的可比长期死亡率风险。

Comparable long-term mortality risk associated with individual sulfonylureas in diabetes patients with heart failure.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Gentofte, Hellerup, Denmark.

出版信息

Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2011 Oct;94(1):119-25. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2011.07.011. Epub 2011 Aug 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.diabres.2011.07.011
PMID:21831467
Abstract

AIMS

The aim was to investigate the outcomes of individual sulfonylureas in patients with heart failure (HF).

METHODS

All patients hospitalized with HF for the first time in 1997-2006, alive 30 days after discharge, and who received anti-diabetic monotherapy with glimepiride (n=1097), glibenclamide (glyburide) (n=1031), glipizide (n=557), gliclazide (n=251), or tolbutamide (n=541) were identified from nationwide registers. Risk of all-cause mortality was assessed by multivariable Cox regression models.

RESULTS

Over the median observational time of 744 (Inter Quartile Range 268-1451) days, 2242 patients (64%) died. The analysis demonstrated similar hazard ratio (HR) for mortality for treatment with glimepiride (1.10 [95% confidence interval 0.92-1.33]), glibenclamide (1.12 [0.93-1.34]), glipizide (1.14 [0.93-1.38]), tolbutamide (1.04 [0.85-1.26]), and gliclazide (reference). Grouped according to pancreatic specificity, i.e., with tolbutamide, glipizide, and gliclazide as specific, and glibenclamide, and glimepiride as non-specific agents, no differential prognosis was found between the two groups (HR 1.04 [0.96-1.14], for non-specific, compared to pancreas specific agents). The prognosis was not dependent on prior acute myocardial infarction or ischemic heart disease (p for interactions >0.3).

CONCLUSIONS

In current clinical practice, it is unlikely that there are considerable differences in risk of mortality associated with individual sulfonylureas in patients with heart failure.

摘要

目的

旨在研究心力衰竭(HF)患者中个体磺酰脲类药物的治疗结局。

方法

从全国性登记处确定了 1997-2006 年首次因 HF 住院且出院后 30 天存活,且接受格列美脲(n=1097)、格列本脲(glyburide)(n=1031)、格列吡嗪(n=557)、格列齐特(n=251)或甲苯磺丁脲(n=541)单药抗糖尿病治疗的所有患者。通过多变量 Cox 回归模型评估全因死亡率的风险。

结果

在中位观察时间 744(四分位距 268-1451)天内,2242 例患者(64%)死亡。分析表明,格列美脲(1.10[95%置信区间 0.92-1.33])、格列本脲(1.12[0.93-1.34])、格列吡嗪(1.14[0.93-1.38])、甲苯磺丁脲(1.04[0.85-1.26])和格列齐特(参照)治疗的死亡率的危险比(HR)相似。根据胰腺特异性分组,即甲苯磺丁脲、格列吡嗪和格列齐特为特异性,格列本脲和格列美脲为非特异性药物,未发现两组之间的预后存在差异(HR 1.04[0.96-1.14],非特异性药物与胰腺特异性药物相比)。预后与既往急性心肌梗死或缺血性心脏病无关(交互作用的 p 值>0.3)。

结论

在当前的临床实践中,心力衰竭患者中使用个体磺酰脲类药物与死亡率相关的风险不太可能存在显著差异。

相似文献

1
Comparable long-term mortality risk associated with individual sulfonylureas in diabetes patients with heart failure.与心力衰竭的糖尿病患者个体使用磺脲类药物相关的可比长期死亡率风险。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2011 Oct;94(1):119-25. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2011.07.011. Epub 2011 Aug 9.
2
The risk of overall mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes receiving glipizide, glyburide, or glimepiride monotherapy: a retrospective analysis.接受格列吡嗪、格列本脲或格列美脲单药治疗的 2 型糖尿病患者的总体死亡率风险:一项回顾性分析。
Diabetes Care. 2010 Jun;33(6):1224-9. doi: 10.2337/dc10-0017. Epub 2010 Mar 9.
3
Increase in overall mortality risk in patients with type 2 diabetes receiving glipizide, glyburide or glimepiride monotherapy versus metformin: a retrospective analysis.与二甲双胍相比,接受格列吡嗪、格列本脲或格列美脲单药治疗的 2 型糖尿病患者的总体死亡率风险增加:一项回顾性分析。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2012 Sep;14(9):803-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2012.01604.x. Epub 2012 Apr 29.
4
The risk of overall mortality in patients with Type 2 diabetes receiving different combinations of sulfonylureas and metformin: a retrospective analysis.2 型糖尿病患者接受不同磺脲类药物和二甲双胍联合治疗的总体死亡率风险:一项回顾性分析。
Diabet Med. 2012 Aug;29(8):1029-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2012.03577.x.
5
Pharmacologic Differences of Sulfonylureas and the Risk of Adverse Cardiovascular and Hypoglycemic Events.磺酰脲类药物的药理差异与不良心血管和低血糖事件风险。
Diabetes Care. 2017 Nov;40(11):1506-1513. doi: 10.2337/dc17-0595. Epub 2017 Sep 1.
6
Glyburide and glipizide, second-generation oral sulfonylurea hypoglycemic agents.格列本脲和格列吡嗪,第二代口服磺酰脲类降糖药。
Clin Pharm. 1984 Sep-Oct;3(5):473-85.
7
Hypoglycemia in hospitalized patients treated with sulfonylureas.住院患者使用磺酰脲类药物治疗时发生的低血糖。
Pharmacotherapy. 2012 Jul;32(7):613-7. doi: 10.1002/j.1875-9114.2011.01088.x. Epub 2012 May 8.
8
Mortality risk among sulfonylureas: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.磺酰脲类药物的死亡率风险:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2015 Jan;3(1):43-51. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(14)70213-X. Epub 2014 Oct 22.
9
Glibenclamide-related excess in total and cardiovascular mortality risks: data from large Ukrainian observational cohort study.格列本脲相关的全因和心血管死亡风险增加:来自大型乌克兰观察性队列研究的数据。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2009 Dec;86(3):247-53. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2009.09.008. Epub 2009 Sep 30.
10
Mortality and cardiovascular risk associated with different insulin secretagogues compared with metformin in type 2 diabetes, with or without a previous myocardial infarction: a nationwide study.与二甲双胍相比,不同胰岛素促分泌剂在有或无既往心肌梗死的 2 型糖尿病患者中的死亡率和心血管风险:一项全国性研究。
Eur Heart J. 2011 Aug;32(15):1900-8. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr077. Epub 2011 Apr 6.

引用本文的文献

1
2023 UPDATE: Luso-Brazilian evidence-based guideline for the management of antidiabetic therapy in type 2 diabetes.2023年更新:葡萄牙-巴西2型糖尿病抗糖尿病治疗管理循证指南
Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2023 Jul 19;15(1):160. doi: 10.1186/s13098-023-01121-x.
2
Portuguese-Brazilian evidence-based guideline on the management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes mellitus.葡萄牙-巴西2型糖尿病高血糖管理循证指南
Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2020 May 24;12:45. doi: 10.1186/s13098-020-00551-1. eCollection 2020.
3
Dose Modification of Antidiabetic Agents in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Heart Failure.
2型糖尿病合并心力衰竭患者抗糖尿病药物的剂量调整
Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2017 Jul-Aug;21(4):618-629. doi: 10.4103/ijem.IJEM_442_16.
4
Addressing limitations in observational studies of the association between glucose-lowering medications and all-cause mortality: a review.解决降糖药物与全因死亡率之间关联的观察性研究中的局限性:一项综述
Drug Saf. 2015 Mar;38(3):295-310. doi: 10.1007/s40264-015-0280-1.
5
Observational studies of the association between glucose-lowering medications and cardiovascular outcomes: addressing methodological limitations.降糖药物与心血管结局关联的观察性研究:应对方法学局限性
Diabetologia. 2014 Nov;57(11):2237-50. doi: 10.1007/s00125-014-3364-z. Epub 2014 Sep 12.
6
Sulfonylurea in combination with insulin is associated with increased mortality compared with a combination of insulin and metformin in a retrospective Danish nationwide study.在丹麦一项全国性回顾性研究中,与胰岛素和二甲双胍联合使用相比,磺脲类药物与胰岛素联合使用会增加死亡率。
Diabetologia. 2015 Jan;58(1):50-8. doi: 10.1007/s00125-014-3372-z. Epub 2014 Sep 10.
7
Cardiovascular effects of anti-diabetic medications in type 2 diabetes mellitus.抗糖尿病药物对 2 型糖尿病患者心血管的影响。
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2013 Jan;15(1):327. doi: 10.1007/s11886-012-0327-1.
8
Association between diabetes mellitus and post-discharge outcomes in patients hospitalized with heart failure: findings from the EVEREST trial.糖尿病与心力衰竭住院患者出院后结局的相关性:EVEREST 试验的结果。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2013 Feb;15(2):194-202. doi: 10.1093/eurjhf/hfs153. Epub 2012 Oct 11.