Department of Cardiology B, section 2141, Rigshospitalet, The Heart Center, Copenhagen University Hospital, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Eur Heart J. 2011 Aug;32(15):1900-8. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr077. Epub 2011 Apr 6.
The impact of insulin secretagogues (ISs) on long-term major clinical outcomes in type 2 diabetes remains unclear. We examined mortality and cardiovascular risk associated with all available ISs compared with metformin in a nationwide study.
All Danish residents >20 years, initiating single-agent ISs or metformin between 1997 and 2006 were followed for up to 9 years (median 3.3 years) by individual-level linkage of nationwide registers. All-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and the composite of myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and cardiovascular mortality associated with individual ISs were investigated in patients with or without previous MI by multivariable Cox proportional-hazard analyses including propensity analyses. A total of 107 806 subjects were included, of whom 9607 had previous MI. Compared with metformin, glimepiride (hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals): 1.32 (1.24-1.40), glibenclamide: 1.19 (1.11-1.28), glipizide: 1.27 (1.17-1.38), and tolbutamide: 1.28 (1.17-1.39) were associated with increased all-cause mortality in patients without previous MI. The corresponding results for patients with previous MI were as follows: glimepiride: 1.30 (1.11-1.44), glibenclamide: 1.47 (1.22-1.76), glipizide: 1.53 (1.23-1.89), and tolbutamide: 1.47 (1.17-1.84). Results for gliclazide [1.05 (0.94-1.16) and 0.90 (0.68-1.20)] and repaglinide and [0.97 (0.81-1.15) and 1.29 (0.86-1.94)] were not statistically different from metformin in both patients without and with previous MI, respectively. Results were similar for cardiovascular mortality and for the composite endpoint.
Monotherapy with the most used ISs, including glimepiride, glibenclamide, glipizide, and tolbutamide, seems to be associated with increased mortality and cardiovascular risk compared with metformin. Gliclazide and repaglinide appear to be associated with a lower risk than other ISs.
胰岛素促分泌剂(ISs)对 2 型糖尿病患者长期主要临床结局的影响仍不清楚。我们在一项全国性研究中,比较了所有可用的 ISs 与二甲双胍相比,与死亡率和心血管风险的关系。
所有丹麦 20 岁以上的居民,在 1997 年至 2006 年间开始单独使用 ISs 或二甲双胍,通过全国性登记册的个体水平链接,最长随访 9 年(中位随访时间 3.3 年)。通过多变量 Cox 比例风险分析(包括倾向评分分析),在有或无既往心肌梗死(MI)的患者中,研究了与个体 ISs 相关的全因死亡率、心血管死亡率以及心肌梗死(MI)、卒中和心血管死亡率的复合终点。共纳入 107806 例患者,其中 9607 例有既往 MI。与二甲双胍相比,格列美脲(危险比和 95%置信区间):1.32(1.24-1.40),格列本脲:1.19(1.11-1.28),格列吡嗪:1.27(1.17-1.38)和甲苯磺丁脲:1.28(1.17-1.39)与无既往 MI 的患者全因死亡率增加相关。对于有既往 MI 的患者,相应的结果如下:格列美脲:1.30(1.11-1.44),格列本脲:1.47(1.22-1.76),格列吡嗪:1.53(1.23-1.89)和甲苯磺丁脲:1.47(1.17-1.84)。格列齐特[1.05(0.94-1.16)和 0.90(0.68-1.20)]和瑞格列奈的结果[0.97(0.81-1.15)和 1.29(0.86-1.94)]与无既往 MI 和有既往 MI 的患者的二甲双胍相比均无统计学差异。心血管死亡率和复合终点的结果相似。
与二甲双胍相比,包括格列美脲、格列本脲、格列吡嗪和甲苯磺丁脲在内的最常用 ISs 的单药治疗似乎与死亡率和心血管风险增加相关。格列齐特和瑞格列奈的风险似乎低于其他 ISs。