• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2 型糖尿病患者接受不同磺脲类药物和二甲双胍联合治疗的总体死亡率风险:一项回顾性分析。

The risk of overall mortality in patients with Type 2 diabetes receiving different combinations of sulfonylureas and metformin: a retrospective analysis.

机构信息

Endocrinology, Summa Western Reserve Hospital Physicians, Inc., Hudson, OH 44236, USA.

出版信息

Diabet Med. 2012 Aug;29(8):1029-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2012.03577.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1464-5491.2012.03577.x
PMID:22248043
Abstract

AIMS

Sulfonylureas have been shown to increase mortality when used in combination with metformin. This may not be a class effect of sulfonylureas, but rather secondary to differences in properties inherent to the individual sulfonylureas (hypoglycaemic risk, sulfonylurea receptor selectivity and effects on myocardial ischemic preconditioning). The purpose of this study was to assess the risk of overall mortality in patients with Type 2 diabetes treated with different combinations of sulfonylureas and metformin.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted using an academic health center enterprise-wide electronic health record system to identify 7320 patients with Type 2 diabetes (3768 initiators of glyburide (glibenclamide) and metformin, 2277 initiators of glipizide and metformin and 1275 initiators of glimepiride and metformin), ≥ 18 years of age and not on insulin or a non-insulin injectable at baseline. The patients were followed for mortality by documentation in the electronic health record and Social Security Death Index. Multivariable Cox models with propensity analysis were used to compare cohorts.

RESULTS

No statistically significant difference in overall mortality risk was observed among the different combinations of sulfonylureas and metformin: glimepiride and metformin vs. glipizide and metformin (HR 1.03; 95% CI 0.89-1.20), glimepiride and metformin vs. glyburide (glibenclamide) and metformin (HR 1.08; 95% CI 0.90-1.30), or with glipizide and metformin vs. glyburide (glibenclamide) and metformin (HR 1.05; 95% CI 0.95-1.15).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results did not identify an increased mortality risk among the different combinations of sulfonylureas and metformin, suggesting that overall mortality is not substantially influenced by the choice of sulfonylurea.

摘要

目的

磺酰脲类药物与二甲双胍联合使用时已被证明会增加死亡率。这可能不是磺酰脲类药物的类效应,而是由于个体磺酰脲类药物固有的特性差异所致(低血糖风险、磺酰脲受体选择性和对心肌缺血预适应的影响)。本研究旨在评估不同磺酰脲类药物与二甲双胍联合治疗 2 型糖尿病患者的总体死亡率风险。

方法

本研究使用学术医疗中心的企业级电子健康记录系统进行回顾性队列研究,以确定 7320 名 2 型糖尿病患者(3768 名格列吡嗪(格列本脲)和二甲双胍的起始使用者,2277 名格列美脲和二甲双胍的起始使用者,1275 名格列齐特和二甲双胍的起始使用者),年龄≥18 岁,基线时未使用胰岛素或非胰岛素注射剂。通过电子健康记录和社会保障死亡指数记录患者的死亡率,并进行随访。采用倾向评分分析的多变量 Cox 模型比较队列。

结果

不同磺酰脲类药物与二甲双胍联合使用的总体死亡率风险无统计学差异:格列美脲和二甲双胍与格列吡嗪和二甲双胍(HR 1.03;95%CI 0.89-1.20)、格列美脲和二甲双胍与格列本脲(格列吡嗪)和二甲双胍(HR 1.08;95%CI 0.90-1.30),或格列吡嗪和二甲双胍与格列本脲(格列吡嗪)和二甲双胍(HR 1.05;95%CI 0.95-1.15)。

结论

我们的研究结果并未发现不同磺酰脲类药物与二甲双胍联合使用的死亡率风险增加,这表明总体死亡率受磺酰脲类药物选择的影响不大。

相似文献

1
The risk of overall mortality in patients with Type 2 diabetes receiving different combinations of sulfonylureas and metformin: a retrospective analysis.2 型糖尿病患者接受不同磺脲类药物和二甲双胍联合治疗的总体死亡率风险:一项回顾性分析。
Diabet Med. 2012 Aug;29(8):1029-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2012.03577.x.
2
Increase in overall mortality risk in patients with type 2 diabetes receiving glipizide, glyburide or glimepiride monotherapy versus metformin: a retrospective analysis.与二甲双胍相比,接受格列吡嗪、格列本脲或格列美脲单药治疗的 2 型糖尿病患者的总体死亡率风险增加:一项回顾性分析。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2012 Sep;14(9):803-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2012.01604.x. Epub 2012 Apr 29.
3
The risk of overall mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes receiving glipizide, glyburide, or glimepiride monotherapy: a retrospective analysis.接受格列吡嗪、格列本脲或格列美脲单药治疗的 2 型糖尿病患者的总体死亡率风险:一项回顾性分析。
Diabetes Care. 2010 Jun;33(6):1224-9. doi: 10.2337/dc10-0017. Epub 2010 Mar 9.
4
Comparable long-term mortality risk associated with individual sulfonylureas in diabetes patients with heart failure.与心力衰竭的糖尿病患者个体使用磺脲类药物相关的可比长期死亡率风险。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2011 Oct;94(1):119-25. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2011.07.011. Epub 2011 Aug 9.
5
Mortality and cardiovascular risk associated with different insulin secretagogues compared with metformin in type 2 diabetes, with or without a previous myocardial infarction: a nationwide study.与二甲双胍相比,不同胰岛素促分泌剂在有或无既往心肌梗死的 2 型糖尿病患者中的死亡率和心血管风险:一项全国性研究。
Eur Heart J. 2011 Aug;32(15):1900-8. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr077. Epub 2011 Apr 6.
6
Coronary heart disease outcomes in patients receiving antidiabetic agents.接受抗糖尿病药物治疗患者的冠心病转归
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2007 Jul;16(7):711-25. doi: 10.1002/pds.1443.
7
Hypoglycemia in hospitalized patients treated with sulfonylureas.住院患者使用磺酰脲类药物治疗时发生的低血糖。
Pharmacotherapy. 2012 Jul;32(7):613-7. doi: 10.1002/j.1875-9114.2011.01088.x. Epub 2012 May 8.
8
All-cause mortality in diabetic patients treated with combinations of sulfonylureas and biguanides.使用磺脲类药物和双胍类药物联合治疗的糖尿病患者的全因死亡率。
Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2004 Jan-Feb;20(1):44-7. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.411.
9
The risk of developing coronary artery disease or congestive heart failure, and overall mortality, in type 2 diabetic patients receiving rosiglitazone, pioglitazone, metformin, or sulfonylureas: a retrospective analysis.接受罗格列酮、吡格列酮、二甲双胍或磺脲类药物治疗的2型糖尿病患者发生冠状动脉疾病或充血性心力衰竭的风险及总体死亡率:一项回顾性分析。
Acta Diabetol. 2009 Jun;46(2):145-54. doi: 10.1007/s00592-008-0090-3. Epub 2009 Feb 5.
10
Dose-response relation between sulfonylurea drugs and mortality in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a population-based cohort study.磺脲类药物与2型糖尿病患者死亡率之间的剂量反应关系:一项基于人群的队列研究。
CMAJ. 2006 Jan 17;174(2):169-74. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.050748.

引用本文的文献

1
Feature extraction for phenotyping from semantic and knowledge resources.从语义和知识资源中进行表型特征提取。
J Biomed Inform. 2019 Mar;91:103122. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103122. Epub 2019 Feb 7.
2
In-Hospital Implementation of Evidence-Based Medications is Associated with Improved Survival in Diabetic Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome - Data from TSOC ACS-DM Registry.基于证据的药物在医院内的应用与糖尿病急性冠脉综合征患者生存率的提高相关——来自TSOC ACS-DM注册研究的数据。
Acta Cardiol Sin. 2018 May;34(3):211-223. doi: 10.6515/ACS.201805_34(3).20180207B.
3
Surrogate-assisted feature extraction for high-throughput phenotyping.
用于高通量表型分析的代理辅助特征提取
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Apr 1;24(e1):e143-e149. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocw135.
4
Toward high-throughput phenotyping: unbiased automated feature extraction and selection from knowledge sources.迈向高通量表型分析:从知识源中进行无偏自动特征提取与选择。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015 Sep;22(5):993-1000. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocv034. Epub 2015 Apr 29.
5
Strategies for handling missing data in electronic health record derived data.电子健康记录衍生数据中缺失数据的处理策略。
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2013 Dec 17;1(3):1035. doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1035. eCollection 2013.
6
Addressing limitations in observational studies of the association between glucose-lowering medications and all-cause mortality: a review.解决降糖药物与全因死亡率之间关联的观察性研究中的局限性:一项综述
Drug Saf. 2015 Mar;38(3):295-310. doi: 10.1007/s40264-015-0280-1.