Uppsala University, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Family Medicine Section, Uppsala, Sweden.
Clin Rehabil. 2011 Nov;25(11):999-1010. doi: 10.1177/0269215511403512. Epub 2011 Aug 10.
To evaluate the health-related quality of life effects of muscle stretching, manual therapy and steroid injections in addition to 'stay active' care in acute or subacute low back pain patients.
A randomized, controlled trial during 10 weeks with four treatment groups.
Nine primary health care and one outpatient orthopaedic hospital department.
One hundred and sixty patients with acute or subacute low back pain.
Ten weeks of 'stay active' care only (group 1), or 'stay active' and muscle stretching (group 2), or 'stay active', muscle stretching and manual therapy (group 3), or 'stay active', muscle stretching, manual therapy and steroid injections (group 4).
The Gothenburg Quality of Life instrument subscales Well-being score and Complaint score.
In a multivariate analysis adjusted for possible outcome affecting variables other than the treatment given Well-being score was 68.4 (12.5), 72.1 (12.4), 72,3 (12.4) and 72.7 (12.5) in groups 1-4, respectively (P for trend <0.05). There were significant trends for the well-being components patience (P < 0.005), energy (P < 0.05), mood (P < 0.05) and family situation (P < 0.05). The remaining two components and Complaint score showed a non-significant trend towards improvement.
The effects on health-related quality of life were greater the larger the number of treatment modalities available. The 'stay active' treatment group, with the most restricted number of modalities, had the most modest health-related quality of life improvement, while group 4 with the most generous choice of treatment modalities, had the greatest improvement.
评估肌肉拉伸、手法治疗和类固醇注射在“保持活跃”治疗急性或亚急性腰痛患者之外的健康相关生活质量影响。
一项 10 周的随机对照试验,有 4 个治疗组。
9 个初级保健和 1 个门诊骨科医院科室。
160 例急性或亚急性腰痛患者。
仅接受 10 周的“保持活跃”治疗(第 1 组),或“保持活跃”加肌肉拉伸(第 2 组),或“保持活跃”、肌肉拉伸和手法治疗(第 3 组),或“保持活跃”、肌肉拉伸、手法治疗和类固醇注射(第 4 组)。
哥德堡生活质量量表子量表幸福感评分和抱怨评分。
在调整了除治疗以外的可能影响结果的变量的多变量分析中,幸福感评分分别为第 1-4 组的 68.4(12.5)、72.1(12.4)、72.3(12.4)和 72.7(12.5)(P 趋势<0.05)。在耐心(P<0.005)、精力(P<0.05)、情绪(P<0.05)和家庭状况(P<0.05)方面,存在显著的改善趋势。其余两个组成部分和抱怨评分也有改善的趋势,但不显著。
治疗方法越多,对健康相关生活质量的影响越大。治疗方法最少的“保持活跃”治疗组,健康相关生活质量改善程度最小,而治疗方法最多的第 4 组,改善程度最大。