Veterans Affairs National Quality Scholars Program, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Int J Qual Health Care. 2011 Dec;23(6):682-9. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzr053. Epub 2011 Aug 10.
To determine the effectiveness of a provider-based education and implementation intervention for improving diabetes control.
Cluster-randomized trial with baseline and follow-up cross sections of diabetes patients in each participating physician's practice.
Eleven US Southeastern states, 2006-08.
Two hundred and five rural primary care physicians.
Multi-component interactive intervention including Web-based continuing medical education, performance feedback and quality improvement tools. Primary Outcome Measures 'Acceptable control' [hemoglobin A1c ≤9%, blood pressure (BP) <140/90 mmHg, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL) <130 mg/dl] and 'optimal control' (A1c <7%, BP <130/80 mmHg, LDL <100 mg/dl).
Of 364 physicians attempting to register, 205 were randomized to the intervention (n= 102) or control arms (n= 103). Baseline and follow-up data were provided by 95 physicians (2127 patients). The proportion of patients with A1c ≤9% was similar at baseline and follow-up in both the control [adjusted odds ratio (AOR): 0.94; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.61, 1.47] and intervention arms [AOR: 1.16 (95% CI: 0.80, 1.69)]; BP <140/90 mmHg and LDL <130 mg/dl were also similar at both measurement points (P= 0.66, P= 0.46; respectively). We observed no significant effect on diabetes control attributable to the intervention for any of the primary outcome measures. Intervention physicians engaged with the Website over a median of 64.7 weeks [interquartile range (IQR): 45.4-81.8) for a median total of 37 min (IQR: 16-66).
A wide-reach, low-intensity, Web-based interactive multi-component intervention did not improve control of glucose, BP or lipids for patients with diabetes of physicians practicing in the rural Southeastern US.
确定基于提供者的教育和实施干预措施对改善糖尿病控制的效果。
在每个参与医生实践中的糖尿病患者的基线和随访横截面中进行的聚类随机试验。
美国东南部的 11 个州,2006-08 年。
205 名农村初级保健医生。
包括基于网络的继续医学教育、绩效反馈和质量改进工具在内的多组分互动干预。主要结局指标“可接受的控制”[血红蛋白 A1c≤9%,血压(BP)<140/90mmHg,低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL)<130mg/dl]和“最佳控制”(A1c<7%,BP<130/80mmHg,LDL<100mg/dl)。
在试图注册的 364 名医生中,有 205 名被随机分配到干预组(n=102)或对照组(n=103)。基线和随访数据由 95 名医生(2127 名患者)提供。在对照组[调整后优势比(AOR):0.94;95%置信区间(CI):0.61,1.47]和干预组[AOR:1.16(95%CI:0.80,1.69)]中,患者的 A1c≤9%的比例在基线和随访时相似;BP<140/90mmHg 和 LDL<130mg/dl 在两个测量点也相似(P=0.66,P=0.46)。我们没有观察到干预措施对任何主要结局指标的糖尿病控制有显著影响。干预医生使用网站的中位数为 64.7 周[四分位距(IQR):45.4-81.8],中位数总用时为 37 分钟(IQR:16-66)。
广泛、低强度、基于网络的互动式多组分干预措施并未改善美国东南部农村地区医生治疗的糖尿病患者的血糖、血压或血脂控制。