• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于网络的糖尿病医生干预:一项群组随机有效性试验。

A web-based diabetes intervention for physician: a cluster-randomized effectiveness trial.

机构信息

Veterans Affairs National Quality Scholars Program, Birmingham, AL, USA.

出版信息

Int J Qual Health Care. 2011 Dec;23(6):682-9. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzr053. Epub 2011 Aug 10.

DOI:10.1093/intqhc/mzr053
PMID:21831967
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3247785/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effectiveness of a provider-based education and implementation intervention for improving diabetes control.

DESIGN

Cluster-randomized trial with baseline and follow-up cross sections of diabetes patients in each participating physician's practice.

SETTING

Eleven US Southeastern states, 2006-08.

PARTICIPANTS

Two hundred and five rural primary care physicians.

INTERVENTION

Multi-component interactive intervention including Web-based continuing medical education, performance feedback and quality improvement tools. Primary Outcome Measures 'Acceptable control' [hemoglobin A1c ≤9%, blood pressure (BP) <140/90 mmHg, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL) <130 mg/dl] and 'optimal control' (A1c <7%, BP <130/80 mmHg, LDL <100 mg/dl).

RESULTS

Of 364 physicians attempting to register, 205 were randomized to the intervention (n= 102) or control arms (n= 103). Baseline and follow-up data were provided by 95 physicians (2127 patients). The proportion of patients with A1c ≤9% was similar at baseline and follow-up in both the control [adjusted odds ratio (AOR): 0.94; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.61, 1.47] and intervention arms [AOR: 1.16 (95% CI: 0.80, 1.69)]; BP <140/90 mmHg and LDL <130 mg/dl were also similar at both measurement points (P= 0.66, P= 0.46; respectively). We observed no significant effect on diabetes control attributable to the intervention for any of the primary outcome measures. Intervention physicians engaged with the Website over a median of 64.7 weeks [interquartile range (IQR): 45.4-81.8) for a median total of 37 min (IQR: 16-66).

CONCLUSIONS

A wide-reach, low-intensity, Web-based interactive multi-component intervention did not improve control of glucose, BP or lipids for patients with diabetes of physicians practicing in the rural Southeastern US.

摘要

目的

确定基于提供者的教育和实施干预措施对改善糖尿病控制的效果。

设计

在每个参与医生实践中的糖尿病患者的基线和随访横截面中进行的聚类随机试验。

地点

美国东南部的 11 个州,2006-08 年。

参与者

205 名农村初级保健医生。

干预措施

包括基于网络的继续医学教育、绩效反馈和质量改进工具在内的多组分互动干预。主要结局指标“可接受的控制”[血红蛋白 A1c≤9%,血压(BP)<140/90mmHg,低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL)<130mg/dl]和“最佳控制”(A1c<7%,BP<130/80mmHg,LDL<100mg/dl)。

结果

在试图注册的 364 名医生中,有 205 名被随机分配到干预组(n=102)或对照组(n=103)。基线和随访数据由 95 名医生(2127 名患者)提供。在对照组[调整后优势比(AOR):0.94;95%置信区间(CI):0.61,1.47]和干预组[AOR:1.16(95%CI:0.80,1.69)]中,患者的 A1c≤9%的比例在基线和随访时相似;BP<140/90mmHg 和 LDL<130mg/dl 在两个测量点也相似(P=0.66,P=0.46)。我们没有观察到干预措施对任何主要结局指标的糖尿病控制有显著影响。干预医生使用网站的中位数为 64.7 周[四分位距(IQR):45.4-81.8],中位数总用时为 37 分钟(IQR:16-66)。

结论

广泛、低强度、基于网络的互动式多组分干预措施并未改善美国东南部农村地区医生治疗的糖尿病患者的血糖、血压或血脂控制。

相似文献

1
A web-based diabetes intervention for physician: a cluster-randomized effectiveness trial.基于网络的糖尿病医生干预:一项群组随机有效性试验。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2011 Dec;23(6):682-9. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzr053. Epub 2011 Aug 10.
2
Medication intensification in diabetes in rural primary care: a cluster-randomised effectiveness trial.农村基层医疗中糖尿病药物强化治疗:一项整群随机有效性试验。
BMJ Open. 2012 Sep 17;2(5). doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-000959. Print 2012.
3
Quality of diabetes mellitus care by rural primary care physicians.农村基层医生对糖尿病的护理质量。
J Rural Health. 2012 Fall;28(4):364-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2012.00410.x. Epub 2012 May 31.
4
Is physician engagement with Web-based CME associated with patients' baseline hemoglobin A1c levels? The Rural Diabetes Online Care study.医生参与基于网络的继续医学教育是否与患者的基线糖化血红蛋白水平相关?农村糖尿病在线护理研究。
Acad Med. 2010 Sep;85(9):1511-7. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181eac036.
5
Comparative effectiveness of outpatient cardiovascular disease and diabetes care delivery between advanced practice providers and physician providers in primary care: Implications for care under the Affordable Care Act.初级保健中高级执业提供者与医师提供者在门诊心血管疾病和糖尿病护理提供方面的比较效果:对《平价医疗法案》下护理的影响。
Am Heart J. 2016 Nov;181:74-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2016.07.020. Epub 2016 Aug 28.
6
Encounter frequency and serum glucose level, blood pressure, and cholesterol level control in patients with diabetes mellitus.糖尿病患者的就诊频率以及血糖水平、血压和胆固醇水平的控制情况。
Arch Intern Med. 2011 Sep 26;171(17):1542-50. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.400.
7
The effect of a web-based training for improving primary health care providers' knowledge about diabetes mellitus management in rural China: A pre-post intervention study.基于网络的培训对改善中国农村基层卫生保健提供者糖尿病管理知识的效果:一项干预前后研究。
PLoS One. 2019 Sep 24;14(9):e0222930. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222930. eCollection 2019.
8
Improving quality improvement using achievable benchmarks for physician feedback: a randomized controlled trial.利用可实现的基准进行医生反馈以改善质量改进:一项随机对照试验。
JAMA. 2001 Jun 13;285(22):2871-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.285.22.2871.
9
Randomized trial of a health IT tool to support between-visit-based laboratory monitoring for chronic disease medication prescriptions.一项关于健康信息技术工具的随机试验,以支持基于就诊间隔的慢性病药物处方实验室监测。
J Gen Intern Med. 2015 May;30(5):619-25. doi: 10.1007/s11606-014-3152-y. Epub 2015 Jan 6.
10
Poor uptake of an online intervention in a cluster randomised controlled trial of online diabetes education for rural general practitioners.在一项针对农村全科医生的在线糖尿病教育整群随机对照试验中,在线干预措施的接受程度较低。
Trials. 2017 Mar 23;18(1):137. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-1869-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice.审核与反馈:对专业实践的影响
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 25;3(3):CD000259. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000259.pub4.
2
Sustainability, spread, and scale in trials using audit and feedback: a theory-informed, secondary analysis of a systematic review.使用审核和反馈进行试验的可持续性、传播和规模:对系统评价的理论启发式二次分析。
Implement Sci. 2023 Oct 26;18(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s13012-023-01312-0.
3
Quality improvement strategies for diabetes care: Effects on outcomes for adults living with diabetes.糖尿病护理质量改进策略:对成年糖尿病患者结局的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 May 31;5(5):CD014513. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014513.
4
The design and rationale of a multicenter real-world trial: The Southeastern Collaboration to Improve Blood Pressure Control in the US Black Belt - Addressing the Triple Threat.一项多中心真实世界试验的设计和原理:美国黑人地带改善血压控制的东南合作——应对三重威胁。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2023 Jun;129:107183. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2023.107183. Epub 2023 Apr 13.
5
Recruitment and retention of primary care practices in the Southeastern Collaboration to Improve Blood Pressure Control.东南部改善血压控制协作项目中初级保健机构的招募与留存
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2023 Jan 16;32:101059. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2023.101059. eCollection 2023 Apr.
6
Systematic review and narrative synthesis of computerized audit and feedback systems in healthcare.医疗保健领域计算机化审核与反馈系统的系统评价及叙述性综合分析
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 May 11;29(6):1106-1119. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocac031.
7
Patterns for Patient Engagement with the Hypertension Management and Effects of Electronic Health Care Provider Follow-up on These Patterns: Cluster Analysis.患者参与高血压管理模式以及电子医疗保健提供者对这些模式的随访效果:聚类分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Sep 28;23(9):e25630. doi: 10.2196/25630.
8
Leveraging Providers' Preferences to Customize Instructional Content in Information and Communications Technology-Based Training Interventions: Retrospective Analysis of a Mobile Phone-Based Intervention in India.利用提供者的偏好定制基于信息和通信技术的培训干预措施中的教学内容:印度基于手机的干预措施的回顾性分析。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Mar 3;8(3):e15998. doi: 10.2196/15998.
9
Health professions digital education on clinical practice guidelines: a systematic review by Digital Health Education collaboration.卫生专业人员临床实践指南数字教育:数字健康教育合作的系统评价。
BMC Med. 2019 Jul 18;17(1):139. doi: 10.1186/s12916-019-1370-1.
10
Online Digital Education for Postregistration Training of Medical Doctors: Systematic Review by the Digital Health Education Collaboration.医生注册后培训的在线数字教育:数字健康教育合作组织的系统评价
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Feb 25;21(2):e13269. doi: 10.2196/13269.

本文引用的文献

1
Is physician engagement with Web-based CME associated with patients' baseline hemoglobin A1c levels? The Rural Diabetes Online Care study.医生参与基于网络的继续医学教育是否与患者的基线糖化血红蛋白水平相关?农村糖尿病在线护理研究。
Acad Med. 2010 Sep;85(9):1511-7. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181eac036.
2
The growth, characteristics, and future of online CME.在线继续医学教育的发展、特点及未来
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2010 Winter;30(1):3-10. doi: 10.1002/chp.20050.
3
Recruitment of rural physicians in a diabetes internet intervention study: overcoming challenges and barriers.农村医生招募在糖尿病网络干预研究中:克服挑战和障碍。
J Natl Med Assoc. 2010 Feb;102(2):101-7. doi: 10.1016/s0027-9684(15)30497-1.
4
Diabetes burden and access to preventive care in the rural United States.美国农村的糖尿病负担和获得预防保健的情况。
J Rural Health. 2010 Winter;26(1):3-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2009.00259.x.
5
Trends in medication use among US adults with diabetes mellitus: glycemic control at the expense of controlling cardiovascular risk factors.美国成年糖尿病患者的用药趋势:以控制心血管危险因素为代价实现血糖控制。
Arch Intern Med. 2009 Oct 12;169(18):1718-20. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.296.
6
Community-based primary care: improving and assessing diabetes management.
Am J Med Qual. 2010 Jan-Feb;25(1):6-12. doi: 10.1177/1062860609345665. Epub 2009 Sep 28.
7
The delivery of public health interventions via the Internet: actualizing their potential.通过互联网提供公共卫生干预措施:发挥其潜力。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2009;30:273-92. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.031308.100235.
8
Achieving desired results and improved outcomes: integrating planning and assessment throughout learning activities.取得预期成果并改善结果:在整个学习活动中整合规划与评估。
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2009 Winter;29(1):1-15. doi: 10.1002/chp.20001.
9
Continuing medical education: AMEE Education Guide No 35.继续医学教育:AMEE教育指南第35号。
Med Teach. 2008;30(7):652-66. doi: 10.1080/01421590802108323.
10
Self-assessment of practice performance: development of the ABIM Practice Improvement Module (PIM).实践表现的自我评估:美国内科医学委员会实践改进模块(PIM)的开发。
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2008 Winter;28(1):38-46. doi: 10.1002/chp.154.