Suppr超能文献

基于网络的糖尿病医生干预:一项群组随机有效性试验。

A web-based diabetes intervention for physician: a cluster-randomized effectiveness trial.

机构信息

Veterans Affairs National Quality Scholars Program, Birmingham, AL, USA.

出版信息

Int J Qual Health Care. 2011 Dec;23(6):682-9. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzr053. Epub 2011 Aug 10.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effectiveness of a provider-based education and implementation intervention for improving diabetes control.

DESIGN

Cluster-randomized trial with baseline and follow-up cross sections of diabetes patients in each participating physician's practice.

SETTING

Eleven US Southeastern states, 2006-08.

PARTICIPANTS

Two hundred and five rural primary care physicians.

INTERVENTION

Multi-component interactive intervention including Web-based continuing medical education, performance feedback and quality improvement tools. Primary Outcome Measures 'Acceptable control' [hemoglobin A1c ≤9%, blood pressure (BP) <140/90 mmHg, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL) <130 mg/dl] and 'optimal control' (A1c <7%, BP <130/80 mmHg, LDL <100 mg/dl).

RESULTS

Of 364 physicians attempting to register, 205 were randomized to the intervention (n= 102) or control arms (n= 103). Baseline and follow-up data were provided by 95 physicians (2127 patients). The proportion of patients with A1c ≤9% was similar at baseline and follow-up in both the control [adjusted odds ratio (AOR): 0.94; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.61, 1.47] and intervention arms [AOR: 1.16 (95% CI: 0.80, 1.69)]; BP <140/90 mmHg and LDL <130 mg/dl were also similar at both measurement points (P= 0.66, P= 0.46; respectively). We observed no significant effect on diabetes control attributable to the intervention for any of the primary outcome measures. Intervention physicians engaged with the Website over a median of 64.7 weeks [interquartile range (IQR): 45.4-81.8) for a median total of 37 min (IQR: 16-66).

CONCLUSIONS

A wide-reach, low-intensity, Web-based interactive multi-component intervention did not improve control of glucose, BP or lipids for patients with diabetes of physicians practicing in the rural Southeastern US.

摘要

目的

确定基于提供者的教育和实施干预措施对改善糖尿病控制的效果。

设计

在每个参与医生实践中的糖尿病患者的基线和随访横截面中进行的聚类随机试验。

地点

美国东南部的 11 个州,2006-08 年。

参与者

205 名农村初级保健医生。

干预措施

包括基于网络的继续医学教育、绩效反馈和质量改进工具在内的多组分互动干预。主要结局指标“可接受的控制”[血红蛋白 A1c≤9%,血压(BP)<140/90mmHg,低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL)<130mg/dl]和“最佳控制”(A1c<7%,BP<130/80mmHg,LDL<100mg/dl)。

结果

在试图注册的 364 名医生中,有 205 名被随机分配到干预组(n=102)或对照组(n=103)。基线和随访数据由 95 名医生(2127 名患者)提供。在对照组[调整后优势比(AOR):0.94;95%置信区间(CI):0.61,1.47]和干预组[AOR:1.16(95%CI:0.80,1.69)]中,患者的 A1c≤9%的比例在基线和随访时相似;BP<140/90mmHg 和 LDL<130mg/dl 在两个测量点也相似(P=0.66,P=0.46)。我们没有观察到干预措施对任何主要结局指标的糖尿病控制有显著影响。干预医生使用网站的中位数为 64.7 周[四分位距(IQR):45.4-81.8],中位数总用时为 37 分钟(IQR:16-66)。

结论

广泛、低强度、基于网络的互动式多组分干预措施并未改善美国东南部农村地区医生治疗的糖尿病患者的血糖、血压或血脂控制。

相似文献

3
Quality of diabetes mellitus care by rural primary care physicians.农村基层医生对糖尿病的护理质量。
J Rural Health. 2012 Fall;28(4):364-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2012.00410.x. Epub 2012 May 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice.审核与反馈:对专业实践的影响
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 25;3(3):CD000259. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000259.pub4.

本文引用的文献

2
The growth, characteristics, and future of online CME.在线继续医学教育的发展、特点及未来
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2010 Winter;30(1):3-10. doi: 10.1002/chp.20050.
6
Community-based primary care: improving and assessing diabetes management.
Am J Med Qual. 2010 Jan-Feb;25(1):6-12. doi: 10.1177/1062860609345665. Epub 2009 Sep 28.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验