• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

糖尿病患者的就诊频率以及血糖水平、血压和胆固醇水平的控制情况。

Encounter frequency and serum glucose level, blood pressure, and cholesterol level control in patients with diabetes mellitus.

作者信息

Morrison Fritha, Shubina Maria, Turchin Alexander

机构信息

Division of Endocrinology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 221 Longwood Ave, Boston, MA 02115, USA.

出版信息

Arch Intern Med. 2011 Sep 26;171(17):1542-50. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.400.

DOI:10.1001/archinternmed.2011.400
PMID:21949161
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3692291/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

More frequent patient-provider encounters may lead to faster control of hemoglobin A1c level, blood pressure (BP), and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol (LDL-C) level (hereafter referred to as hemoglobin A1c, BP, and LDL-C) and improve outcomes, but no guidelines exist for how frequently patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) should be seen.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study analyzed 26,496 patients with diabetes and elevated hemoglobin A1c, BP, and/or LDL-C treated by primary care physicians at 2 teaching hospitals between January 1, 2000, and January 1, 2009. The relationship between provider encounter (defined as a note in the medical record) frequency and time to hemoglobin A1c, BP, and LDL-C control was assessed.

RESULTS

Comparing patients who had encounters with their physicians between 1 to 2 weeks vs 3 to 6 months, median time to hemoglobin A1c less than 7.0% was 4.4 vs 24.9 months (not receiving insulin) and 10.1 vs 52.8 months (receiving insulin); median time to BP lower than 130/85 mm Hg was 1.3 vs 13.9 months; and median time to LDL-C less than 100 mg/dL was 5.1 vs 32.8 months, respectively (P<.001 for all). In multivariable analysis, doubling the time between physician encounters led to an increase in median time to hemoglobin A1c (not receiving [35%] and receiving [17%] insulin), BP (87%), and LDL-C (27%) targets (P<.001 for all). Time to control decreased progressively as encounter frequency increased up to once every 2 weeks for most targets, consistent with the pharmacodynamics of the respective medication classes.

CONCLUSIONS

Primary care provider encounters every 2 weeks are associated with fastest achievement of hemoglobin A1c, BP, and LDL-C targets for patients with diabetes mellitus.

摘要

背景

患者与医疗服务提供者更频繁的接触可能会使糖化血红蛋白水平、血压(BP)和低密度脂蛋白(LDL)胆固醇水平(以下简称糖化血红蛋白、血压和LDL-C)得到更快控制,并改善治疗结果,但目前尚无关于糖尿病(DM)患者应多久就诊一次的指南。

方法

这项回顾性队列研究分析了2000年1月1日至2009年1月1日期间在两家教学医院由初级保健医生治疗的26496例糖化血红蛋白、血压和/或LDL-C升高的糖尿病患者。评估了医疗服务提供者接触(定义为病历中的记录)频率与糖化血红蛋白、血压和LDL-C控制时间之间的关系。

结果

将每1至2周与医生接触一次的患者与每3至6个月与医生接触一次的患者进行比较,糖化血红蛋白低于7.0%的中位时间在未接受胰岛素治疗的患者中分别为4.4个月和24.9个月,在接受胰岛素治疗的患者中分别为10.1个月和52.8个月;血压低于130/85 mmHg的中位时间分别为1.3个月和13.9个月;LDL-C低于100 mg/dL的中位时间分别为5.1个月和32.8个月(所有P值均<0.001)。在多变量分析中,医生接触时间加倍会导致糖化血红蛋白(未接受[35%]和接受[17%]胰岛素)、血压(87%)和LDL-C(27%)达到目标的中位时间增加(所有P值均<0.001)。对于大多数目标,随着接触频率增加至每2周一次,控制时间逐渐缩短,这与各药物类别的药效动力学一致。

结论

对于糖尿病患者,每2周与初级保健提供者接触一次与最快达到糖化血红蛋白、血压和LDL-C目标相关。

相似文献

1
Encounter frequency and serum glucose level, blood pressure, and cholesterol level control in patients with diabetes mellitus.糖尿病患者的就诊频率以及血糖水平、血压和胆固醇水平的控制情况。
Arch Intern Med. 2011 Sep 26;171(17):1542-50. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.400.
2
HEMOGLOBIN A1C, BLOOD PRESSURE, AND LDL-CHOLESTEROL CONTROL AMONG HISPANIC/LATINO ADULTS WITH DIABETES: RESULTS FROM THE HISPANIC COMMUNITY HEALTH STUDY/STUDY OF LATINOS (HCHS/SOL).西班牙裔/拉丁裔糖尿病成年患者的糖化血红蛋白、血压及低密度脂蛋白胆固醇控制情况:来自西班牙裔社区健康研究/拉丁裔研究(HCHS/SOL)的结果
Endocr Pract. 2017 Oct;23(10):1232-1253. doi: 10.4158/EP171765.OR. Epub 2017 Aug 17.
3
Maintenance of Clinical Endpoints After Discharge from a Pharmacist-Managed Risk Reduction Clinic at a Veterans Affairs Medical Center.退伍军人事务医疗中心药剂师管理的风险降低诊所出院后临床终点的维持情况。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2016 Jan;22(1):14-20. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2016.22.1.14.
4
When it comes to primary care, more may be more: comment on "Encounter frequency and serum glucose level, blood pressure, and cholesterol level control in patients with diabetes mellitus".说到初级保健,多或许更好:对《糖尿病患者的就诊频率与血糖水平、血压及胆固醇水平控制》的评论
Arch Intern Med. 2011 Sep 26;171(17):1550-1. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.403.
5
Comparative effectiveness of outpatient cardiovascular disease and diabetes care delivery between advanced practice providers and physician providers in primary care: Implications for care under the Affordable Care Act.初级保健中高级执业提供者与医师提供者在门诊心血管疾病和糖尿病护理提供方面的比较效果:对《平价医疗法案》下护理的影响。
Am Heart J. 2016 Nov;181:74-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2016.07.020. Epub 2016 Aug 28.
6
Lifestyle counseling in routine care and long-term glucose, blood pressure, and cholesterol control in patients with diabetes.在常规护理中进行生活方式咨询以及长期控制糖尿病患者的血糖、血压和胆固醇
Diabetes Care. 2012 Feb;35(2):334-41. doi: 10.2337/dc11-1635.
7
Effect of Multifactorial Treatment Targets and Relative Importance of Hemoglobin A1c, Blood Pressure, and Low-Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol on Cardiovascular Diseases in Chinese Primary Care Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Population-Based Retrospective Cohort Study.中国基层医疗 2 型糖尿病患者多因素治疗靶点及血红蛋白 A1c、血压和低密度脂蛋白胆固醇的相对重要性对心血管疾病的影响:基于人群的回顾性队列研究。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Aug 17;6(8):e006400. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.006400.
8
Prevalence of achievement of A1c, blood pressure, and cholesterol (ABC) goal in veterans with diabetes.糖尿病退伍军人中糖化血红蛋白(A1c)、血压和胆固醇(ABC)目标达成情况的患病率
J Manag Care Pharm. 2011 May;17(4):304-12. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2011.17.4.304.
9
Diabetes outcomes in specialist and general practitioner settings in Singapore: challenges of right-siting.新加坡专科医生和全科医生环境下的糖尿病治疗结果:合理选址的挑战。
Ann Acad Med Singap. 2008 Nov;37(11):929-35.
10
A counterargument to encounter frequency and target achievement: measurement variability.针对遭遇频率和目标达成的一个反驳观点:测量变异性。
Arch Intern Med. 2012 Feb 27;172(4):374; author reply 374-5. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.807.

引用本文的文献

1
Association between follow-up visit frequency, medication types prescribed, and glycaemic outcomes among diabetic patients in China's Basic Public Health Services programme: a retrospective cohort study.中国基本公共卫生服务项目中糖尿病患者的随访就诊频率、所开药物类型与血糖结果之间的关联:一项回顾性队列研究
BMJ Public Health. 2025 Jul 22;3(2):e001245. doi: 10.1136/bmjph-2024-001245. eCollection 2025.
2
Integrated Blood Multiparameter Precise Sensing System for Economical, Rapid, and Accurate Detection of Blood Biochemical Indicators: From Centrifugation to Sensing.用于经济、快速、准确检测血液生化指标的集成式血液多参数精确传感系统:从离心到传感
ACS Omega. 2025 Jun 5;10(23):25084-25090. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.5c03352. eCollection 2025 Jun 17.
3
Adherence to physician visits for diabetes care and cardiovascular disease risk: A retrospective cohort study using an administrative claims database.糖尿病护理和心血管疾病风险的就诊依从性:一项使用行政索赔数据库的回顾性队列研究。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2025 Aug;27(8):4590-4593. doi: 10.1111/dom.16479. Epub 2025 May 19.
4
The association of life's essential 8 scores trajectory patterns with the risk of all cancer types.生命必需8项评分轨迹模式与所有癌症类型风险的关联。
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 20;15(1):9600. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-94009-x.
5
Estimating optimal thresholds for adherence to RASA medications among older adults with hypertension.估算老年高血压患者服用RASA药物依从性的最佳阈值。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2025 Jan;31(1):25-32. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.1.25.
6
EXpanding Technology-Enabled, Nurse-Delivered Chronic Disease Care (EXTEND): Protocol and Baseline Data for a Randomized Trial.EXpanding Technology-Enabled, Nurse-Delivered Chronic Disease Care (EXTEND): 一项随机试验的方案和基线数据。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2024 Nov;146:107673. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2024.107673. Epub 2024 Aug 30.
7
A retrospective cohort study of a community-based primary care program's effects on pharmacotherapy quality in low-income Peruvians with type 2 diabetes and hypertension.一项关于社区初级保健项目对秘鲁低收入2型糖尿病和高血压患者药物治疗质量影响的回顾性队列研究。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Aug 22;4(8):e0003512. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003512. eCollection 2024.
8
Medicaid insured persons with diabetes have increased proportion of missed appointments and high HbA1c.参加医疗补助计划的糖尿病患者错过预约的比例增加,糖化血红蛋白水平也较高。
Am J Med Open. 2022 Aug 31;8:100022. doi: 10.1016/j.ajmo.2022.100022. eCollection 2022 Dec.
9
Beyond the EHR: How Digital Health Tools Foster Participatory Health and Self-Care for Patients with Diabetes.超越电子健康记录:数字健康工具如何促进糖尿病患者的参与式健康和自我护理。
Am J Med Open. 2023 May 6;10:100043. doi: 10.1016/j.ajmo.2023.100043. eCollection 2023 Dec.
10
Effectiveness of Nutritional Guidance Focusing on Leucine Intake During Cardiac Rehabilitation Maintenance.心脏康复维持期以亮氨酸摄入为重点的营养指导的有效性。
Juntendo Iji Zasshi. 2023 Dec 22;70(1):29-43. doi: 10.14789/jmj.JMJ23-0008-OA. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Relationship between patient panel characteristics and primary care physician clinical performance rankings.患者群体特征与初级保健医生临床绩效排名之间的关系。
JAMA. 2010 Sep 8;304(10):1107-13. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.1287.
2
Encounter frequency and blood pressure in hypertensive patients with diabetes mellitus.高血压合并糖尿病患者的就诊频率与血压。
Hypertension. 2010 Jul;56(1):68-74. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.109.148791. Epub 2010 May 24.
3
Prevalence of diabetes and high risk for diabetes using A1C criteria in the U.S. population in 1988-2006.1988-2006 年美国人群中应用 A1C 标准评估的糖尿病及糖尿病高危的流行率。
Diabetes Care. 2010 Mar;33(3):562-8. doi: 10.2337/dc09-1524. Epub 2010 Jan 12.
4
Standards of medical care in diabetes--2010.《糖尿病医疗护理标准——2010》
Diabetes Care. 2010 Jan;33 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S11-61. doi: 10.2337/dc10-S011.
5
Statement by an American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists/American College of Endocrinology consensus panel on type 2 diabetes mellitus: an algorithm for glycemic control.美国临床内分泌医师协会/美国内分泌学会关于 2 型糖尿病的共识声明:血糖控制的算法。
Endocr Pract. 2009 Sep-Oct;15(6):540-59. doi: 10.4158/EP.15.6.540.
6
Liraglutide vs insulin glargine and placebo in combination with metformin and sulfonylurea therapy in type 2 diabetes mellitus (LEAD-5 met+SU): a randomised controlled trial.利拉鲁肽与甘精胰岛素及安慰剂联合二甲双胍和磺脲类药物治疗2型糖尿病(LEAD-5 met+SU):一项随机对照试验
Diabetologia. 2009 Oct;52(10):2046-55. doi: 10.1007/s00125-009-1472-y. Epub 2009 Aug 14.
7
Saxagliptin added to a submaximal dose of sulphonylurea improves glycaemic control compared with uptitration of sulphonylurea in patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomised controlled trial.西格列汀联合亚最大剂量磺酰脲类药物治疗与磺酰脲类药物滴定治疗 2 型糖尿病患者的疗效比较:一项随机对照试验。
Int J Clin Pract. 2009 Sep;63(9):1395-406. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2009.02143.x. Epub 2009 Jul 15.
8
Liraglutide, a once-daily human GLP-1 analogue, added to a sulphonylurea over 26 weeks produces greater improvements in glycaemic and weight control compared with adding rosiglitazone or placebo in subjects with Type 2 diabetes (LEAD-1 SU).利拉鲁肽,一种每日一次的人胰高血糖素样肽-1类似物,在26周内添加到磺脲类药物中,与在2型糖尿病患者中添加罗格列酮或安慰剂相比,在血糖和体重控制方面产生了更大的改善(LEAD-1 SU)。
Diabet Med. 2009 Mar;26(3):268-78. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2009.02666.x.
9
Comparison of information content of structured and narrative text data sources on the example of medication intensification.以药物强化为例比较结构化和叙述性文本数据源的信息内容
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009 May-Jun;16(3):362-70. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2777. Epub 2009 Mar 4.
10
Perspective roundtable: redesigning primary care.观点圆桌会议:重新设计初级医疗保健
N Engl J Med. 2008 Nov 13;359(20):e24. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp0809050.