Department of Psychology, Catholic University of Milan Milan, Italy.
Front Psychol. 2010 Jul 2;1:27. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00027. eCollection 2010.
the empirically supported treatments (ESTs) movement, linked with the evidence-based medicine (EBM) perspective and the "Common Factors" approach, typically connected with the "Dodo Bird Verdict". About the first perspective, since 1998 a list of ESTs has been established in mental health field. Criterions for "well-established" and "probably efficacious" treatments have arisen. The development of these kinds of paradigms was motivated by the emergence of a "managerial" approach and related systems for remuneration also for mental health providers and for insurance companies. In this article ESTs will be presented underlining also some possible criticisms. Finally complementary approaches, that could add different evidence in the psychotherapy research in comparison with traditional EBM approach, are presented.
一是经验支持的治疗（ESTs）运动，与循证医学（EBM）观点相关联；二是“共同因素”方法，通常与“渡渡鸟裁决”有关。关于第一个观点，自 1998 年以来，心理健康领域已经确立了一系列 ESTs。“成熟”和“可能有效”治疗的标准已经出现。这些范式的发展是由“管理”方法的出现以及相关的薪酬系统推动的，这些系统也适用于心理健康提供者和保险公司。本文将介绍 ESTs，并强调一些可能的批评。最后，还介绍了一些补充方法，与传统的 EBM 方法相比，这些方法可以为心理治疗研究增加不同的证据。
