Department of Measurement, Statistics & Evaluation, University of Maryland College Park, MD, USA.
Front Psychol. 2010 Oct 29;1:165. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00165. eCollection 2010.
The current study assessed the viability of mixture confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) for measurement invariance testing by evaluating the ability of mixture CFA models to identify differences in factor loadings across populations with identical mean structures. Using simulated data from a model with known parameters, convergence rates, parameter recovery, and the power of the likelihood-ratio test were investigated as impacted by sample size, latent class proportions, magnitude of factor loading differences, percentage of non-invariant factor loadings, and pattern of non-invariant factor loadings. Results suggest that mixture CFA models may be a viable option for testing the invariance of factor loadings; however, without differences in latent means and measurement intercepts, results suggest that larger sample sizes, more non-invariant factor loadings, and larger amounts of heterogeneity are needed to successfully estimate parameters and detect differences across latent classes.
本研究通过评估混合 CFA 模型在具有相同均值结构的人群中识别因子载荷差异的能力,评估了混合确认性因子分析 (CFA) 在测量不变性检验中的可行性。使用具有已知参数、收敛率、参数恢复的模拟数据,以及似然比检验的功效,研究了样本量、潜在类别比例、因子载荷差异的大小、非不变因子载荷的百分比以及非不变因子载荷的模式对其的影响。结果表明,混合 CFA 模型可能是测试因子载荷不变性的一种可行选择;然而,在潜在均值和测量截距没有差异的情况下,结果表明需要更大的样本量、更多的非不变因子载荷和更大的异质性,才能成功估计参数并检测潜在类别之间的差异。