Suppr超能文献

类风湿关节炎患者在使用传统 DMARDs 或托珠单抗治疗后发生下胃肠道穿孔:系统文献回顾。

Lower gastrointestinal perforation in rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with conventional DMARDs or tocilizumab: a systematic literature review.

机构信息

School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

出版信息

Clin Rheumatol. 2011 Nov;30(11):1471-4. doi: 10.1007/s10067-011-1827-x. Epub 2011 Aug 11.

Abstract

Tocilizumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting the IL-6 receptor, has recently been added to the therapeutic armamentarium against rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Despite its overall safety, concerns have been raised regarding diverticular perforation in patients receiving the drug. The aim of our research was to document the incidence of diverticular disease in RA patients treated in the pre-disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) era, following treatment with conventional DMARDs, and subsequent to tocilizumab therapy. We performed a systematic literature review in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Conference Proceedings Citation Index-Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Current Controlled Trials up to Nov. 2010. The publication titles and abstracts were independently assessed by two reviewers for relevance and quality, and the review was conducted following guidelines from the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. In the pre-DMARD period of RA management, where patients were largely treated with NSAIDs and corticosteroids, gastrointestinal (GI) complications were a substantial cause of mortality with diverticulitis and colonic ulcers accounting for almost a third of GI-related deaths. In contrast, our search did not reveal any evidence of diverticular perforation in patients treated with conventional DMARDs. Eighteen cases of lower GI perforation (16 of whom had diverticulitis) have been documented in recent conference proceedings following tocilizumab treatment in clinical trials, with a lower GI perforation rate of 1.9 per 1,000 patient years (PY). This lies between the reported rate of GI perforations for corticosteroids and anti-TNF-α agents in the United Health Care database, with rates of 3.9 per 1,000 PY (95% CI 3.1-4.8) and 1.3 per 1,000 PY (95% CI 0.8-1.9), respectively. The majority of these patients were concurrently prescribed NSAIDs and/or long-term corticosteroids. Traditional DMARD therapy for RA appears not only to have modified the risk of lower GI perforation but prevented it. The risk of diverticular perforation may be slightly higher in patients treated with tocilizumab compared with conventional DMARDs or anti-TNF agents, but lower than that for corticosteroids. The mechanism of action of IL-6 antagonism in the pathophysiology of diverticular perforation has yet to be elucidated.

摘要

托珠单抗是一种针对白细胞介素 6 受体的单克隆抗体,最近已被添加到治疗类风湿关节炎(RA)的武器库中。尽管它总体上是安全的,但人们对接受该药治疗的患者出现憩室穿孔表示担忧。我们的研究目的是记录在疾病修饰抗风湿药物(DMARD)治疗前、接受传统 DMARD 治疗后和托珠单抗治疗后 RA 患者中憩室疾病的发病率。我们在 MEDLINE、EMBASE、会议论文集引文索引-科学、Cochrane 对照试验中心注册和当前对照试验中进行了系统的文献复习,截至 2010 年 11 月。两名评审员对出版物标题和摘要进行了独立评估,以确定其相关性和质量,该综述遵循了评论和传播中心的指南。在 RA 管理的 DMARD 治疗前阶段,患者主要接受 NSAIDs 和皮质类固醇治疗,胃肠道(GI)并发症是导致死亡率很高的主要原因,憩室炎和结直肠溃疡占 GI 相关死亡的近三分之一。相比之下,我们的检索没有发现任何接受传统 DMARD 治疗的患者发生憩室穿孔的证据。在临床试验中,托珠单抗治疗后最近的会议记录中记录了 18 例下 GI 穿孔(其中 16 例为憩室炎),下 GI 穿孔率为每 1000 患者年 1.9 例(95%CI1.0-2.9)。这介于美国健康保险数据库中皮质类固醇和抗 TNF-α 药物报道的 GI 穿孔率之间,分别为每 1000 患者年 3.9 例(95%CI3.1-4.8)和 1.3 例(95%CI0.8-1.9)。这些患者大多同时服用 NSAIDs 和/或长期皮质类固醇。RA 的传统 DMARD 治疗不仅改变了下 GI 穿孔的风险,而且还预防了下 GI 穿孔的发生。与传统 DMARD 或抗 TNF-α 药物相比,托珠单抗治疗的患者发生憩室穿孔的风险可能略高,但低于皮质类固醇。白细胞介素 6 拮抗作用在憩室穿孔发病机制中的作用机制尚待阐明。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验