Suppr超能文献

马尼托巴炎症性肠病队列研究:对补充和替代医学服务及产品使用情况的前瞻性纵向评估。

The Manitoba Inflammatory Bowel Disease Cohort Study: a prospective longitudinal evaluation of the use of complementary and alternative medicine services and products.

机构信息

University of Manitoba IBD Clinical and Research Centre, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.

出版信息

Gut. 2012 Apr;61(4):521-7. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2011-300219. Epub 2011 Aug 11.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the prevalence of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use over time in a population-based cohort of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).

METHODS

The Manitoba IBD Cohort Study is a longitudinal, population-based study of multiple determinants of health outcomes in an IBD cohort. Participants completed semi-annual surveys, and annual in-person interviews. Enquiries about the use of 12 types of CAM service providers and 13 CAM products, based on items from a national survey, were included at months 0, 12, 30 and 54.

RESULTS

Overall, 74% of respondents used a CAM service or product in the 4.5-year period, with approximately 40% using some type of CAM at each time point, and 14% using CAM consistently at every time point. There was a trend for women to use CAM more than men; there was no difference in CAM use between patients with Crohn's disease and those with ulcerative colitis. The most often used CAM services (on average) were massage therapy (30%) and chiropractic (14%), physiotherapy (4%), acupuncture (3.5%) and naturopathy/homeopathy (3.5%). A wide range of CAM products were used, with Lactobacillus acidophilus (8%), fish and other oils (5.5%), glucosamine (4%) and chamomile (3.5%) as the most common. On average, only 18% of consumers used CAM for their IBD, so the majority chose it for other problems. There were no differences in psychological variables between CAM users and non-users.

CONCLUSIONS

Those with IBD commonly try CAM, although very few use these approaches regularly over the years. CAM is not usually used by patients with IBD for disease management, but clinicians should be aware that many will test the services and products.

摘要

目的

在一个基于人群的炎症性肠病(IBD)患者队列中,随时间推移确定补充和替代医学(CAM)的使用流行率。

方法

曼尼托巴 IBD 队列研究是一项对 IBD 队列中健康结果的多种决定因素进行的纵向、基于人群的研究。参与者完成了半年一次的调查和年度面对面访谈。根据全国性调查的项目,在第 0、12、30 和 54 个月时询问了 12 种 CAM 服务提供者和 13 种 CAM 产品的使用情况。

结果

总体而言,74%的受访者在 4.5 年内使用了 CAM 服务或产品,大约 40%的受访者在每个时间点使用某种类型的 CAM,14%的受访者在每个时间点持续使用 CAM。女性使用 CAM 的比例高于男性;克罗恩病和溃疡性结肠炎患者之间的 CAM 使用无差异。使用最频繁的 CAM 服务(平均)为按摩疗法(30%)和脊椎按摩疗法(14%)、物理疗法(4%)、针灸(3.5%)和顺势疗法/顺势疗法(3.5%)。使用的 CAM 产品种类繁多,其中嗜酸乳杆菌(8%)、鱼和其他油(5.5%)、葡萄糖胺(4%)和甘菊(3.5%)最为常见。平均而言,只有 18%的消费者将 CAM 用于治疗 IBD,因此大多数人选择它来治疗其他问题。CAM 用户和非用户之间的心理变量没有差异。

结论

IBD 患者通常会尝试 CAM,尽管多年来只有很少一部分人会定期使用这些方法。CAM 通常不是 IBD 患者用于疾病管理的方法,但临床医生应该意识到许多患者会尝试这些服务和产品。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验