Bishara Anthony J, Pleskac Timothy J, Fridberg Daniel J, Yechiam Eldad, Lucas Jesolyn, Busemeyer Jerome R, Finn Peter R, Stout Julie C
Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Indiana, USA.
J Behav Decis Mak. 2009 Oct;22(4):435-454. doi: 10.1002/bdm.641.
Performance on complex decision-making tasks may depend on a multitude of processes. Two such tasks, the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) and Balloon Analog Risk Task (BART), are of particular interest because they are associated with real world risky behavior, including illegal drug use. We used cognitive models to disentangle underlying processes in both tasks. Whereas behavioral measures from the IGT and BART were uncorrelated, cognitive models revealed two reliable cross-task associations. Results suggest that the tasks similarly measure loss aversion and decision-consistency processes, but not necessarily the same learning process. Additionally, substance-using individuals (and especially stimulant users) performed worse on the IGT than healthy controls did, and this pattern could be explained by reduced decision consistency.
复杂决策任务的表现可能取决于众多过程。两项这样的任务,即爱荷华赌博任务(IGT)和气球模拟风险任务(BART),特别受关注,因为它们与现实世界中的风险行为相关,包括非法药物使用。我们使用认知模型来剖析这两项任务中的潜在过程。虽然IGT和BART的行为测量结果不相关,但认知模型揭示了两个可靠的跨任务关联。结果表明,这两项任务同样测量损失厌恶和决策一致性过程,但不一定是相同的学习过程。此外,使用物质的个体(尤其是兴奋剂使用者)在IGT上的表现比健康对照组差,这种模式可以通过决策一致性降低来解释。