Baitz Heather A, Jones Paul W, Campbell David A, Jones Andrea A, Gicas Kristina M, Giesbrecht Chantelle J, Loken Thornton Wendy, Barone Carmelina C, Wang Nena Y, Panenka William J, Lang Donna J, Vila-Rodriguez Fidel, Leonova Olga, Barr Alasdair M, Procyshyn Ric M, Buchanan Tari, Rauscher Alexander, MacEwan G William, Honer William G, Thornton Allen E
Department of Psychology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada.
Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Front Psychol. 2021 Jul 2;12:571423. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.571423. eCollection 2021.
The Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) is a widely used measure of decision making, but its value in signifying behaviors associated with adverse, "real-world" consequences has not been consistently demonstrated in persons who are precariously housed or homeless. Studies evaluating the ecological validity of the IGT have primarily relied on traditional IGT scores. However, computational modeling derives underlying component processes of the IGT, which capture specific facets of decision making that may be more closely related to engagement in behaviors associated with negative consequences. This study employed the Prospect Valence Learning (PVL) model to decompose IGT performance into component processes in 294 precariously housed community residents with substance use disorders. Results revealed a predominant focus on gains and a lack of sensitivity to losses in these vulnerable community residents. Hypothesized associations were not detected between component processes and self-reported health-risk behaviors. These findings provide insight into the processes underlying decision making in a vulnerable substance-using population and highlight the challenge of linking specific decision making processes to "real-world" behaviors.
爱荷华赌博任务(IGT)是一种广泛使用的决策衡量方法,但在住房不稳定或无家可归的人群中,其在表明与不良“现实世界”后果相关行为方面的价值尚未得到一致证明。评估IGT生态效度的研究主要依赖于传统的IGT分数。然而,计算建模得出了IGT的潜在组成过程,这些过程捕捉了决策的特定方面,可能与参与与负面后果相关的行为更密切相关。本研究采用前景效价学习(PVL)模型,将294名患有物质使用障碍的住房不稳定社区居民的IGT表现分解为组成过程。结果显示,这些弱势社区居民主要关注收益,对损失缺乏敏感性。在组成过程与自我报告的健康风险行为之间未检测到假设的关联。这些发现为弱势物质使用人群决策背后的过程提供了见解,并突出了将特定决策过程与“现实世界”行为联系起来的挑战。