Singh Shakuntala A, Singh Ajai R
Reader and Head, Dept. of Philosophy, Joshi-Bedekar College, Thane. Deputy Editor, Mens Sana Monographs .
Mens Sana Monogr. 2009 Jan;7(1):110-27. doi: 10.4103/0973-1229.38517.
In the light of Sri Aurobindo's philosophy, this paper looks into some of the problems of contemporary man as an individual, a member of society, a citizen of his country, a component of this world, and of nature itself. Concepts like Science; Nature,;Matter; Mental Being; Mana-purusa; Prana-purusa; Citta-purusa; Nation-ego and Nation-soul; True and False Subjectivism; World-state and World-union; Religion of Humanism are the focus of this paper. NATURE: Beneath the diversity and uniqueness of the different elements in Nature there is an essential unity that not only allows for this diversity but even supports it. Nature is both a benefactor and a force: a benefactor, because it acts to carry out the evolution of mankind; a force, because it also supplies the necessary energy and momentum to achieve it. NATURAL CALAMITIES: If mankind can quieten the tsunamis and cyclones and droughts and earthquakes that rage within, and behave with care and compassion towards Nature, not exploiting, denuding, or denigrating it, there is a strong possibility that Nature too will behave with equal care and compassion towards man and spare him the natural calamities than rend him asunder. SCIENCE: The limitation of science become obvious, according to Sri Aurobindo, when we realize that it has mastered knowledge of processes and helped in the creation of machinery but is ignorant of the foundations of being and, therefore, cannot perfect our nature or our life. SCIENCE AND PHILOSOPHY: The insights of philosophy could become heuristic and algorithmic models for scientific experimentation. MATTER: An interesting aspect of Sri Aurobindo's philosophy is his acceptance of the reality of matter even while highlighting its inadequacies; the ultimate goal, according to him, is the divination of matter itself. PURUSA: If the mana-purusa (mental being) were to log on to the genuine citta-purusa (psychic formation), without necessarily logging off from the prana-purusa (frontal formation), it may help quieten the turbulences within, which may be a prelude to the quietening of the disturbances without, whether it be physical maladies, cravings (for food, fame, fortune, etc.), destructive competitiveness; or wars, terrorism, ethnic conflicts, communal riots, and the other such social maladies that afflict mankind today. NATION-EGO (FALSE SUBJECTIVISM) AND NATION-SOUL (TRUE SUBJECTIVISM): Sri Aurobindo considers Nation-ego an example of false subjectivism, in which national identity and pride are stressed to prove one's superiority and suppress or exploit the rest. The Nation-soul, as an example of true subjectivism, attempts to capture one's traditional heritage and values in its pristine form, not as a reaction to hurts and angers or as compensation for real or imagined injuries or indignities of the past. WORLD-STATE (FALSE SUBJECTIVISM) AND WORLD-UNION (TRUE SUBJECTIVISM): Similarly, a World-state founded upon the principle of centralization and uniformity, a mechanical and formal unity, is an example of false subjectivism, while a World-union founded upon the principle of liberty and variation in a free and intelligent unity is an example of true subjectivism HUMAN ACTUALIZATION: Even if two human beings are similar, in so far as they are human beings, there is so much diversity between them. Part of the movement towards human self-actualization lies in the fact that this diversity should not be forcibly curbed, as also the realization that beneath all that appears disparate there is an essential unity. Also, man is not the end product of evolution but an intermediate stage between the animal and the divine. Moreover, he is endowed with consciousness that enables him to cooperate with the forces of evolution and speed up and telescope the next stage of evolution.
根据室利·阿罗频多的哲学思想,本文探讨了当代人作为个体、社会成员、国家公民、世界组成部分以及自然本身的一些问题。诸如科学、自然、物质、精神存在、意生身、气生身、心识身、国家自我与国家灵魂、真主观主义与假主观主义、世界国家与世界联盟、人文主义宗教等概念是本文的重点。
在自然中不同元素的多样性和独特性之下,存在着一种本质的统一性,这种统一性不仅允许这种多样性,甚至支持它。自然既是施惠者也是一种力量:作为施惠者,因为它推动人类的进化;作为一种力量,因为它也提供实现进化所需的能量和动力。
如果人类能够平息内心肆虐的海啸、飓风、干旱和地震,并以关爱和同情对待自然,不剥削、不掠夺、不诋毁自然,那么自然很有可能也会以同样的关爱和同情对待人类,使他免受那些将他撕裂的自然灾害。
按照室利·阿罗频多的观点,当我们意识到科学掌握了过程知识并帮助创造了机器,但却对存在的基础一无所知,因此无法完善我们的本性或生活时,科学的局限性就变得明显了。
哲学的见解可以成为科学实验的启发式和算法模型。
室利·阿罗频多哲学的一个有趣方面是,他在强调物质的不足之处的同时,也承认物质的现实性;据他所说,最终目标是对物质本身的神视。
如果意生身(精神存在)登录到真正的心识身(心理构成),而不一定从气生身(正面构成)注销,这可能有助于平息内心的动荡,这可能是平息外部干扰的前奏,无论是身体疾病、欲望(对食物、名声、财富等)、破坏性竞争,还是战争、恐怖主义、种族冲突、社区骚乱以及当今困扰人类的其他此类社会弊病。
国家自我(假主观主义)与国家灵魂(真主观主义):室利·阿罗频多认为国家自我是假主观主义的一个例子,在其中强调国家身份和自豪感以证明自己的优越性,并压制或剥削他人。国家灵魂作为真主观主义的一个例子,试图以其原始形式捕捉一个人的传统遗产和价值观,而不是作为对伤害和愤怒的反应,或作为对过去真实或想象的伤害或侮辱的补偿。
世界国家(假主观主义)与世界联盟(真主观主义):同样,建立在集中化和统一原则基础上的世界国家,一种机械和形式上的统一,是假主观主义的一个例子,而建立在自由和智能统一中的自由和多样性原则基础上的世界联盟是真主观主义的一个例子。
即使两个人作为人类是相似的,但他们之间也存在着如此多的差异。人类自我实现的部分进程在于不应强行抑制这种差异,同时也要认识到在所有看似不同的事物之下存在着本质的统一性。此外,人不是进化的最终产物,而是动物与神性之间的中间阶段。而且,他被赋予了意识,使他能够与进化的力量合作,加速并浓缩进化的下一阶段。