Suppr超能文献

切除范围和常规腔镜下边缘切除技术的美容效果。

Volume of excision and cosmesis with routine cavity shave margins technique.

机构信息

Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.

出版信息

Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Mar;19(3):886-91. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-1982-y. Epub 2011 Aug 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cavity shave margin (CSM) removal is a surgical technique that reduces re-excision rates. One criticism of this technique has been that negative margins are obtained primarily as a result of higher volumes of tissue removed. This study evaluates the volume of tissue removed in a group that underwent CSM versus one that underwent standard partial mastectomy (SPM) and explores cosmetic outcomes.

METHODS

Single-institution retrospective review identified 533 patients with a diagnosis of breast cancer who underwent PM. Matched pair analysis of 72 patients who had undergone PM with CSM versus 72 who had undergone SPM was performed. Volumes were calculated from dimensions in the pathology report. A subgroup was analyzed by a multidisciplinary panel for cosmetic outcome using the Harvard Breast Cosmesis Grading Scale.

RESULTS

Mean tumor size in the CSM group was 1.52 versus 1.51 cm(3) in the SPM (P = 0.8073). Mean total volume of tissue excised with CSM was lower than that in the SPM group. Mean volume of excision with CSM was 80.66 and 165.1 cm(3) in the SPM group (P = 0.0005). Patients undergoing CSM required fewer re-excisions than the SPM group: 13 (18.1%) versus 25 (34.6%) (P = 0.03). Mean score for cosmesis was 2.3 in the CSM group and 3.0 for SPM (P = 0.0004).

CONCLUSIONS

CSM decreases the need for re-excision. Total tissue volume excised is lower in patients who undergo CSM, and cosmetic results appear to be improved. This approach should be considered for all patients undergoing PM.

摘要

背景

腔镜下切缘(CSM)切除是一种降低再次切除率的手术技术。该技术的一个批评是,阴性切缘主要是由于切除的组织体积较大而获得的。本研究评估了一组接受 CSM 与一组接受标准部分乳房切除术(SPM)的患者的组织切除量,并探讨了美容结果。

方法

单机构回顾性研究确定了 533 例接受乳房切除术的乳腺癌患者。对 72 例接受 CSM 的患者与 72 例接受 SPM 的患者进行了匹配对分析。体积从病理报告中的尺寸计算得出。一个亚组由多学科小组使用哈佛乳房美容分级量表对美容结果进行分析。

结果

CSM 组的平均肿瘤大小为 1.52cm³,而 SPM 组为 1.51cm³(P=0.8073)。CSM 组切除的组织总体积低于 SPM 组。CSM 组的平均切除体积为 80.66cm³和 165.1cm³(P=0.0005)。接受 CSM 的患者比 SPM 组需要更少的再次切除:13 例(18.1%)与 25 例(34.6%)(P=0.03)。CSM 组的美容平均评分为 2.3,SPM 组为 3.0(P=0.0004)。

结论

CSM 减少了再次切除的需要。接受 CSM 的患者切除的组织总体积较低,且美容效果似乎有所改善。这种方法应考虑用于所有接受 PM 的患者。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验