• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

切除范围和常规腔镜下边缘切除技术的美容效果。

Volume of excision and cosmesis with routine cavity shave margins technique.

机构信息

Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.

出版信息

Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Mar;19(3):886-91. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-1982-y. Epub 2011 Aug 12.

DOI:10.1245/s10434-011-1982-y
PMID:21837529
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cavity shave margin (CSM) removal is a surgical technique that reduces re-excision rates. One criticism of this technique has been that negative margins are obtained primarily as a result of higher volumes of tissue removed. This study evaluates the volume of tissue removed in a group that underwent CSM versus one that underwent standard partial mastectomy (SPM) and explores cosmetic outcomes.

METHODS

Single-institution retrospective review identified 533 patients with a diagnosis of breast cancer who underwent PM. Matched pair analysis of 72 patients who had undergone PM with CSM versus 72 who had undergone SPM was performed. Volumes were calculated from dimensions in the pathology report. A subgroup was analyzed by a multidisciplinary panel for cosmetic outcome using the Harvard Breast Cosmesis Grading Scale.

RESULTS

Mean tumor size in the CSM group was 1.52 versus 1.51 cm(3) in the SPM (P = 0.8073). Mean total volume of tissue excised with CSM was lower than that in the SPM group. Mean volume of excision with CSM was 80.66 and 165.1 cm(3) in the SPM group (P = 0.0005). Patients undergoing CSM required fewer re-excisions than the SPM group: 13 (18.1%) versus 25 (34.6%) (P = 0.03). Mean score for cosmesis was 2.3 in the CSM group and 3.0 for SPM (P = 0.0004).

CONCLUSIONS

CSM decreases the need for re-excision. Total tissue volume excised is lower in patients who undergo CSM, and cosmetic results appear to be improved. This approach should be considered for all patients undergoing PM.

摘要

背景

腔镜下切缘(CSM)切除是一种降低再次切除率的手术技术。该技术的一个批评是,阴性切缘主要是由于切除的组织体积较大而获得的。本研究评估了一组接受 CSM 与一组接受标准部分乳房切除术(SPM)的患者的组织切除量,并探讨了美容结果。

方法

单机构回顾性研究确定了 533 例接受乳房切除术的乳腺癌患者。对 72 例接受 CSM 的患者与 72 例接受 SPM 的患者进行了匹配对分析。体积从病理报告中的尺寸计算得出。一个亚组由多学科小组使用哈佛乳房美容分级量表对美容结果进行分析。

结果

CSM 组的平均肿瘤大小为 1.52cm³,而 SPM 组为 1.51cm³(P=0.8073)。CSM 组切除的组织总体积低于 SPM 组。CSM 组的平均切除体积为 80.66cm³和 165.1cm³(P=0.0005)。接受 CSM 的患者比 SPM 组需要更少的再次切除:13 例(18.1%)与 25 例(34.6%)(P=0.03)。CSM 组的美容平均评分为 2.3,SPM 组为 3.0(P=0.0004)。

结论

CSM 减少了再次切除的需要。接受 CSM 的患者切除的组织总体积较低,且美容效果似乎有所改善。这种方法应考虑用于所有接受 PM 的患者。

相似文献

1
Volume of excision and cosmesis with routine cavity shave margins technique.切除范围和常规腔镜下边缘切除技术的美容效果。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Mar;19(3):886-91. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-1982-y. Epub 2011 Aug 12.
2
Breast-Conserving Surgeries With and Without Cavity Shave Margins Have Different Re-excision Rates and Associated Overall Cost: Institutional and Patient-Driven Decisions for Its Utilization.保乳手术有腔镜下切缘与无腔镜下切缘的再次切除率和相关总成本不同:其使用的机构和患者驱动决策。
Clin Breast Cancer. 2021 Oct;21(5):e594-e601. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2021.03.003. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
3
Intra-operative touch preparation cytology; does it have a role in re-excision lumpectomy?术中触摸准备细胞学检查;它在再切除乳房肿块切除术中起作用吗?
Ann Surg Oncol. 2007 Mar;14(3):1045-50. doi: 10.1245/s10434-006-9263-x. Epub 2007 Jan 6.
4
Impact of systematic cavity shave margins in breast-conserving surgery at a large community hospital with a low baseline re-excision rate.在一个低基线再次切除率的大型社区医院中,保乳手术中系统性切缘空腔刮除的影响。
Breast J. 2020 Oct;26(10):1960-1965. doi: 10.1111/tbj.14057. Epub 2020 Oct 19.
5
Sampling of secondary margins decreases the need for re-excision after partial mastectomy.局部乳房切除术后再次切除的需求因次级边缘取样而减少。
Surgery. 2011 Oct;150(4):802-9. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2011.07.064.
6
Shaves off the Cavity or Specimen in Lumpectomy for Breast Cancer.在乳腺癌保乳术中切除腔或标本。
J Surg Res. 2022 Sep;277:296-302. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.04.027. Epub 2022 May 5.
7
Economic Impact of Routine Cavity Margins Versus Standard Partial Mastectomy in Breast Cancer Patients: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial.乳腺癌患者常规切缘与标准保乳手术的经济影响:一项随机对照试验的结果
Ann Surg. 2017 Jan;265(1):39-44. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001799.
8
Systematic cavity shaves reduces close margins and re-excision rates in breast conserving surgery.系统性的腔隙切除可降低保乳手术中的切缘阳性率和再次切除率。
Breast. 2006 Jun;15(3):326-30. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2005.10.006. Epub 2005 Dec 5.
9
Do additional shaved margins at the time of lumpectomy eliminate the need for re-excision?在乳房肿瘤切除术时增加切除边缘是否可以避免再次切除的需要?
Am J Surg. 2008 Oct;196(4):556-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.06.007.
10
Discordance between pathologic and radiologic tumor size on breast MRI may contribute to increased re-excision rates.乳腺MRI上病理与放射学肿瘤大小之间的不一致可能导致再次切除率增加。
Am Surg. 2011 Oct;77(10):1361-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Ex vivo fluorescence-guided resection margin assessment in breast cancer surgery using a topically applied, cathepsin-activatable imaging agent.在乳腺癌手术中使用局部应用的组织蛋白酶激活型成像剂进行离体荧光引导的切缘评估。
Pharmacol Res. 2024 Nov;209:107464. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2024.107464. Epub 2024 Oct 12.
2
Routine four-quadrant cavity shaving at the time of wide local excision for breast cancer reduces re-excision rate.在进行乳腺癌广泛局部切除时,常规进行四象限腔镜下切除可降低再次切除率。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2023 Jan;105(1):56-61. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2021.0285. Epub 2022 Feb 17.
3
Effect of Surgeon Factors on Long-Term Patient-Reported Outcomes After Breast-Conserving Therapy in Older Breast Cancer Survivors.
外科医生因素对老年乳腺癌幸存者保乳治疗后长期患者报告结局的影响。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2020 Apr;27(4):1013-1022. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-08165-2. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
4
Novel techniques for intraoperative assessment of margin involvement.术中评估切缘受累情况的新技术。
Ecancermedicalscience. 2018 Jan 10;12:795. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2018.795. eCollection 2018.
5
Cavity Shaving plus Lumpectomy versus Lumpectomy Alone for Patients with Breast Cancer Undergoing Breast-Conserving Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.乳腺癌保乳手术患者行腔隙剃除加乳房肿块切除术与单纯乳房肿块切除术的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 3;12(1):e0168705. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168705. eCollection 2017.
6
The Evolution of Axillary Staging in Breast Cancer.乳腺癌腋窝分期的演变
Mo Med. 2015 Sep-Oct;112(5):385-8.
7
Toolbox to Reduce Lumpectomy Reoperations and Improve Cosmetic Outcome in Breast Cancer Patients: The American Society of Breast Surgeons Consensus Conference.降低乳腺癌患者乳房肿瘤切除术再手术率并改善美容效果的工具箱:美国乳腺外科医师协会共识会议
Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Oct;22(10):3174-83. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-4759-x. Epub 2015 Jul 28.
8
A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Cavity Shave Margins in Breast Cancer.一项关于乳腺癌切缘环切的随机对照试验。
N Engl J Med. 2015 Aug 6;373(6):503-10. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1504473. Epub 2015 May 30.
9
[Conservative treatment of breast cancer: experience of a Tunisian team].[乳腺癌的保守治疗:突尼斯团队的经验]
Pan Afr Med J. 2014 Oct 15;19:148. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2014.19.148.4195. eCollection 2014.
10
A randomized prospective study of lumpectomy margin assessment with use of MarginProbe in patients with nonpalpable breast malignancies.一项使用MarginProbe对不可触及乳腺恶性肿瘤患者进行肿块切除术切缘评估的随机前瞻性研究。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 May;21(5):1589-95. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-3602-0. Epub 2014 Mar 5.