Suppr超能文献

支气管一氧化氮通量(J'aw)对哮喘吸烟者的口服皮质类固醇敏感。

Bronchial nitric oxide flux (J'aw) is sensitive to oral corticosteroids in smokers with asthma.

机构信息

Respiratory Medicine Section, Institute of Infection, Immunity & Inflammation, University of Glasgow & Gartnavel General Hospital, Asthma Research Unit, Level 6, 1053 Gt Western Rd, Glasgow G12 OYN, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Respir Med. 2011 Dec;105(12):1823-30. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2011.06.014. Epub 2011 Aug 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Exhaled nitric oxide provides a convenient, non-invasive insight into airway inflammation. However it is suppressed by current smoking, reducing its potential as an endpoint in studies of smokers with asthma, a group with increased symptoms and poor clinical responses to corticosteroids. We examined extended nitric oxide analysis as some derived variables are thought to be unaffected. Therefore this approach could reveal hidden inflammation and enable its use as an exploratory endpoint in this group.

METHODS

Smokers (n = 22) and never smokers (n = 21) with asthma performed exhaled nitric oxide measurements and spirometry before and after two weeks of oral dexamethasone (6 mg/1.74 m(2)/day). Linear and non-linear nitric oxide analysis was performed to derive estimates for alveolar nitric oxide (C(alv)) and nitric oxide flux (J'(aw)) for each subject.

RESULTS

FE(NO50) was significantly lower in smokers with asthma and did not change significantly in response to dexamethasone. C(alv) derived by linear modelling was lower in smokers with asthma and did not change significantly in response in either group. J'(aw) was substantially lower in smokers with asthma (smokers (median (IQR)); 573 pl/s (217, 734), non-smoker; 1535 pl/s (785, 3496), p = 0.001) and was reduced in both groups following dexamethasone (non-smokers change (mean (95% CI)); -743.3 pl/s (-1710, -163), p = 0.005, smokers; -293 pl/s (-572, -60), p = 0.016). Correction for axial flow did not substantially change the derived results.

CONCLUSIONS

Bronchial NO flux appears to be sensitive to oral dexamethasone and may provide a useful exploratory endpoint for the analysis of novel anti-inflammatory therapies in smokers with asthma.

摘要

背景

呼气一氧化氮(NO)提供了一种方便、无创的气道炎症检测方法。然而,由于其受到当前吸烟的抑制,使其作为哮喘患者(该群体的症状加重,且对皮质类固醇的临床反应较差)研究的终点的潜力降低。我们研究了扩展的 NO 分析,因为一些衍生变量被认为不受影响。因此,这种方法可以揭示隐藏的炎症,并使其能够作为该群体的探索性终点进行使用。

方法

22 名吸烟的哮喘患者和 21 名从不吸烟的哮喘患者在接受两周的口服地塞米松(6mg/1.74m2/天)治疗前后进行了呼气一氧化氮测量和肺功能检查。对每位受试者进行线性和非线性 NO 分析,以得出肺泡一氧化氮(C(alv))和一氧化氮通量(J'(aw))的估计值。

结果

FE(NO50)在哮喘吸烟者中明显较低,且对地塞米松治疗无明显变化。线性模型得出的 C(alv)在哮喘吸烟者中较低,且在两组中均无明显变化。哮喘吸烟者的 J'(aw)明显较低(吸烟者(中位数(IQR)):573 pl/s(217,734),非吸烟者:1535 pl/s(785,3496),p = 0.001),且两组在接受地塞米松治疗后均减少(非吸烟者的变化(平均值(95%CI)):-743.3 pl/s(-1710,-163),p = 0.005,吸烟者:-293 pl/s(-572,-60),p = 0.016)。对轴向流的校正并没有实质性地改变这些衍生结果。

结论

支气管 NO 通量似乎对地塞米松口服治疗敏感,并且可能为分析哮喘吸烟者的新型抗炎治疗提供有用的探索性终点。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验