Suppr超能文献

在人体葡萄糖周转率测量中,没有证据表明氚标记葡萄糖示踪剂存在同位素歧视现象。

No evidence for isotope discrimination of tritiated glucose tracers in measurements of glucose turnover rates in man.

作者信息

Koivisto V A, Yki-Järvinen H, Puhakainen I, Virkamäki A, Kolaczynski J, DeFronzo R

机构信息

Second Department of Medicine, Helsinki University Hospital, Finland.

出版信息

Diabetologia. 1990 Mar;33(3):168-73. doi: 10.1007/BF00404045.

Abstract

Under non-steady-state conditions, glucose turnover rates determined with tritiated glucose tracers are often underestimated. To examine whether isotope discrimination or a tracer contaminant can contribute to this, we compared the turnover rates of unlabelled and tritiated glucose under isotopic steady-state conditions. The turnover rates were measured in 20 healthy subjects at two insulin concentrations (79 +/- 3 mU.l-1 and 704 +/- 62 mU.l-1). Euglycaemia was maintained by infusing unlabelled glucose mixed with (3(3)H)- or (6(3)H)-glucose. In both studies, the isotopically determined glucose disposal rate was virtually identical to the exogenous glucose infusion rate (low insulin 7.66 +/- 0.48 vs 7.58 +/- 0.44 mg.kg-1.min-1, high insulin 13.36 +/- 0.74 vs 13.55 +/- 0.98 mg.kg-1.min-1). The individual values were correlated in both the low (r = 0.85, p less than 0.001) and high dose insulin (r = 0.81, p less than 0.001) studies. Tritiated glucose specific activities were also compared in arterialized and deep venous blood across forearm tissues during the high-dose insulin infusion. Glucose specific activities were similar in arterialized and deep venous blood when analysed with HPLC and conventional methods. In summary: (1) Under isotopic steady-state conditions the turnover rates of unlabelled and labelled glucoses are similar. (2) Unlabelled and labelled glucose are handled identically across forearm tissues. (3) We found no tracer impurity in our tritiated glucose preparations. We conclude that (3(3)H)- and (6(3)H)-glucose tracers can be used to reliably measure glucose turnover rates in man.

摘要

在非稳态条件下,用氚标记的葡萄糖示踪剂测定的葡萄糖转换率常常被低估。为了研究同位素歧视或示踪剂污染物是否会导致这种情况,我们在同位素稳态条件下比较了未标记和氚标记葡萄糖的转换率。在20名健康受试者中,于两种胰岛素浓度(79±3 mU.l-1和704±62 mU.l-1)下测量转换率。通过输注与(3(3)H)-或(6(3)H)-葡萄糖混合的未标记葡萄糖来维持血糖正常。在两项研究中,同位素测定的葡萄糖处置率实际上与外源性葡萄糖输注率相同(低胰岛素时为7.66±0.48 vs 7.58±0.44 mg.kg-1.min-1,高胰岛素时为13.36±0.74 vs 13.55±0.98 mg.kg-1.min-1)。在低剂量(r = 0.85,p<0.001)和高剂量胰岛素(r = 0.81,p<0.001)研究中,个体值均具有相关性。在高剂量胰岛素输注期间,还比较了经前臂组织的动脉化血和深静脉血中氚标记葡萄糖的比活性。用高效液相色谱法和传统方法分析时,动脉化血和深静脉血中的葡萄糖比活性相似。总之:(1)在同位素稳态条件下,未标记和标记葡萄糖的转换率相似。(2)未标记和标记葡萄糖在前臂组织中的处理方式相同。(3)我们在氚标记葡萄糖制剂中未发现示踪剂杂质。我们得出结论,(3(3)H)-和(6(3)H)-葡萄糖示踪剂可用于可靠地测量人体中的葡萄糖转换率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验