School of Psychology, Deakin University, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, Victoria 3125, Australia.
Body Image. 2011 Sep;8(4):315-21. doi: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2011.07.001. Epub 2011 Aug 16.
The present study evaluated whether the strength of relationship between contextual cues (presence of company and mood) and state body dissatisfaction varied as a function of individual differences in key trait measures (body shame, body surveillance tendencies, internalization of appearance standards, and trait affect) which have been linked to trait body dissatisfaction. Fifty-five undergraduate women completed a questionnaire containing the trait-based measures and then carried a Personal Digital Assistant (PDA) for a 7-day period. The PDA prompted participants six times daily to self-report their current mood and state body dissatisfaction. Multi-level modeling revealed that individual differences in body shame predicted inter-individual variability in the strength of the relationships between presence of company and state body dissatisfaction, and positive mood and state body dissatisfaction. Trait positive affect also explained variance in the positive mood state-body dissatisfaction relationship. The implications of the findings for prevention of body image disturbances are discussed.
本研究评估了情境线索(陪伴和情绪)与状态身体不满之间的关系强度是否因与特质身体不满相关的关键特质测量(身体羞耻感、身体监控倾向、外表标准内化和特质情感)的个体差异而有所不同。55 名本科女性完成了一份包含基于特质的测量问卷,然后携带个人数字助理(PDA)进行了 7 天的时间。PDA 每天提示参与者六次,自行报告他们当前的情绪和状态身体不满。多层次模型显示,身体羞耻感的个体差异预测了陪伴和状态身体不满之间的关系强度以及积极情绪和状态身体不满之间的个体间可变性。特质积极情感也解释了积极情绪状态-身体不满关系中的方差。讨论了这些发现对预防身体形象障碍的意义。