SCRI (Scottish Crop Research Institute), Invergowrie, Dundee DD2 5DA, UK.
J Exp Bot. 2011 Nov;62(15):5233-9. doi: 10.1093/jxb/err232. Epub 2011 Aug 12.
In the recent past there was a widespread working assumption in many countries that problems of food production had been solved, and that food security was largely a matter of distribution and access to be achieved principally by open markets. The events of 2008 challenged these assumptions, and made public a much wider debate about the costs of current food production practices to the environment and whether these could be sustained. As in the past 50 years, it is anticipated that future increases in crop production will be achieved largely by increasing yields per unit area rather than by increasing the area of cropped land. However, as yields have increased, so the ratio of photosynthetic energy captured to energy expended in crop production has decreased. This poses a considerable challenge: how to increase yield while simultaneously reducing energy consumption (allied to greenhouse gas emissions) and utilizing resources such as water and phosphate more efficiently. Given the timeframe in which the increased production has to be realized, most of the increase will need to come from crop genotypes that are being bred now, together with known agronomic and management practices that are currently under-developed.
在最近的过去,许多国家普遍存在这样一种工作假设,即粮食生产问题已经得到解决,粮食安全在很大程度上是一个分配和获取的问题,主要通过开放市场来实现。2008 年的事件挑战了这些假设,并公开了一场更广泛的关于当前粮食生产实践对环境的成本的辩论,以及这些成本是否可持续。与过去 50 年一样,预计未来的作物产量增长将主要通过提高单位面积的产量来实现,而不是通过增加耕地面积来实现。然而,随着产量的增加,用于作物生产的光合作用能量与消耗的能量之间的比例已经下降。这带来了相当大的挑战:如何在提高产量的同时降低能源消耗(与温室气体排放相关),并更有效地利用水和磷酸盐等资源。鉴于需要在规定的时间内实现增产,大部分增产将需要来自目前正在培育的作物基因型,以及目前尚未充分发展的已知农业和管理实践。